The Other Meta: Reflections on Grixis
Features
The_Gentleman
7 July 2009
1272 views
7 July 2009
1272 views
So, you're scanning the spoiler for M10 with a skeptical look on your face. That white board sweeper...it doesn't look like Wrath of God, does it? You have never seriously considered black due to the unfortunate fact that there are maybe three standard playable mono black cards. Might the meta-game be turned on its ear?
Although this article isn't really about M10, considerations on what cards to buy (and more so what decks to build for the upcoming months) are causing many players a great deal of grief. When players that mean business go to purchase cards, they consider it an investment. And at $22 dollars a pop for any given card in the top 20 standard, it had better be an investment that sticks. Check out this sick (mostly) post-tenth edition list by German innovator and Regional top-eighter, Benjamin Luft:
Mainboard:
- 4 Demigod of Revenge
- 3 Plumeveil
- 4 Broken Ambitions
- 2 Banefire
- 4 Double Negative
- 3 Terminate
- 2 Pyroclasm
- 4 Cryptic Command *list*
- 3 Jace Beleren
- 2 Cruel Ultimatum
- 3 Volcanic Fallout
- 4 Crumbling Necropolis
- 4 Reflecting Pool
- 4 Cascade Bluffs
- 3 Sunken Ruins
- 3 Vivid Creek
- 2 Vivid Marsh
- 5 Island
- 1 Mountain
- 1 Swamp
Sideboard:
- 4 Anathemancer
- 2 Deathmark
- 2 Flashfreeze
- 2 Pithing Needle
- 1 Volcanic Fallout
- 2 Swerve
- 2 Thought Hemorrhage
Wow! Yes! It's a beast! Grixis finally reared it's demonic head in the metagame, and the results were favorable.
I. Love. This. List.
It's hard to go wrong with the slick landbase, and although slow on the upstart, this deck has intense wrecking power. Pyroclasms (easily replaceable with Fallout) stand in for great crowd control early, backed by a strong handful of Terminates and Broken Ambitions. Between Cryptic and Double Negative, what's not to to love? I could talk about this all day; I recommend you sleeve it up and give it a go. Really, it's just absurd. I mean...come on.
For all you visual learners out there:
W I N
OK, seriously, I think it's really equipped to handle the meta, especially if you run Fallouts over Pyroclasm. I like to run three Banefires myself, but it can get clunky. A friend suggested Ponder to smooth out the draws and mulligan situations, but, as usual, it's all personal preference.
If you're looking to run something different and powerful this FNM, if you (like I) love the flavor of Grixis, or if you're just getting tired of Faeries, I ask that you give it a go and tell me what you think.
With this article (and every article I will write henceforth), I hope to bring you an interesting look at the meta from a teir 1.5-2 perspective. This doesn't mean that I am exploring inferior decks: I seek to beat my opponent consistently, and by a means of my own choosing. If you feel the same, have any feedback on this article, or wish to mention any emerging awesome decklists (maybe your own!), just shoot me a message!
Tune in to next week to catch my (significantly lengthier) rant on decks devoid of creatures in standard. Peace out!
I agree with Engineer's Double Negative comment, if your that concerned over cascade, maybe mainboard 2 or even 1 because against any other deck i dont see any way for it NOT to be a dead card.
Card draw = good, and Mulldrifter is a solid card, maybe switch it for Plumeveil ...
Engineer you forgot Banefire and Cruel Ultimatum as win conditions. Although You cant just banefire for X=20, (itd be pretty amizing though) so either way you need Demigod to smooth out. Also, you usually win when you cast Cruel Ultimatum . I mean games just turn upside down the second its cast
July 7, 2009 10:51 p.m.
The_Gentleman says... #3
Thanks for the comments guys. Concerning win conditions, banefire cannot be counted out (as adrul mentions).
The demigods are really, really intense. To say that there are only four instances of them would be to lessen their function greatly.
And concerning your opinions on double negative: I think you guys are on crack! You could go negate or remove soul, but why bother. It's not like r/u is going to be a stretch with this manna base. There are decks in which I would play cancel before I would play remove soul or negate. So why not play "cancel +" ? Sure, it's no cryptic, but that's why it's three mana (and that's also why we have cryptic!). I have never found a double negative to be a worthless card in hand: it has such utility. It either counters one or two, regardless of the "creature vs. non-creature" clause.
But, as I said, that's just me. I love double negative, especially in the current meta.
July 8, 2009 4:42 a.m.
The_Gentleman says... #4
Oh, I'm not a fan of the plumeveils either. I'd just go hard removal there.
July 8, 2009 4:43 a.m.
Engineer_of_Eos says... #5
Well, I'm inclined to take your word on the Double Negative issue. I really like the card, too, I just wasn't sure if it ever was difficult to play. Or (seeing as there are so many high costed card in the deck) if you ever had to choose between playing a threat and saving three mana for Double Negative (whereas a 2 cmc counter would have let you do both). Seeing as you've actually played the deck, it sounds like Double Negative was a good card choice.
And yes, I overlooked Banefire, which is definitely a win condition. And with 9 cards that can draw you at least one card, you're right to say that "Just" four Demigod of Revenge is enough.
July 8, 2009 5:11 p.m.
hmmm i guess double negative could work, i just see it, as most of the time being a color intensive cancel... soft counters such as remove soul (im sorry essence scatter) just dont require you to make that mana commitment both in cost and color. in any case i guess its up 2 personal choice.
About Demigod. He doesnt play well with Path to exile, and if im not mistaken, PtE is good removal. You probably wont get there with just demigod beatdown unless you've got some of them in the graveyard, and PtE prevents that. Thats why Demigod was the bomb to go to bfore Conflux, or maybe a little bfore that. Now Broodmate Dragon has taken the role precisly because its naturaly resitent to spot removal, which is at such high quality in this meta. Celestial Purge is also seeing some SB play so...
Either way, this deck's role is to control until you can send your win conditions in a favorable manner (wait, this is a control deck, scratch that last sentence). in any case, we know the deck can win, if not we probably wouldnt be talking about it.
July 10, 2009 1:56 a.m.
DevouringFlame says... #7
From personal experience running a list fairly close to the one detailed here, Grixis control is too much fun (and it wins you lots of boosters!)- and it's only going to get better after M10 (die kithkin, die.)
@Adrul, Demigod did lose some of its potency with the release of conflux, but he's still one of the most resilient creatures in it's colors. I've found myself vs Blightning beatdown at 6 hp, chucking demigods, then swinging for 15. With the release of megrimish discard all over again, I can see him sticking around.
That said, I also like having a copy of Oona, Queen of the Fae around. Especially since mono colored decks are going to be abundant with the release of M10.
July 11, 2009 6:02 p.m.
I'm wondering why Twincast didn't make the list... Twincast a banefire,a cruel ultimatum, or their cryptic command. Take your pick...bane fire for 7 or 10? You have no counter for my cruel ultimatur...why don't you do it twice? You have a counter for cruel ultimatum, counter your counter.
Engineer_of_Eos says... #1
Grixis! Oh, it does my heart good to see a Grixis deck out there. I've been contemplating a Grixis Control deck for a while now. Funnily enough, though, I was planning on making room for Nicol Bolas, Planeswalker. One slot, possibly two.
I must say, I love Swerve in the sideboard. Swerve your Banefire? WIN. And other things, but that's my dream scenario.
I want to talk about a few things: First of all, it looks like several Mainboard cards should be sideboard cards. For example: Double-Negative. That's tech against 5 Color Blood, or other decks with Cascade. Why, then, is it mainboarded? Wouldn't Remove Soul or Negate be a more cost-effective, less color-intense option?
Second of all, and this is just me spouting my personal preference, I would love to see more card advantage. Ponder sounds great. Mulldrifter is a well known card. I love the Jace in there. (I love card advantage; the deck is solid as is, I just want to add more card draw/selection. I can't help it.)
I'd also prefer some other creature over Plumeveil, because it can't attack. The Win conditions in this deck are 1) Demigod. 2) Mill with Jace. I'd just like to see something else that can do damage. But again, that could very well just be me.
July 7, 2009 10:16 p.m.