KrazyCaley's Deckbuilders' Challenge- Best of the Worst (And Results from Two-Headed Antagonist!)
Deck Challenges
KrazyCaley
28 September 2010
1278 views
28 September 2010
1278 views
Look, everyone, I am indeed alive despite having my own newly-founded law practiceOHGODITBURNS.
First, results from that last one I did that I vaguely remember writing the challenge for:
Lots of honorable mentions to pass out here:
Honorable Mention - Zazi - Burn Baby Burn and Great wall of Magic
This entry couldn't quite crack the top 10 because it often couldn't finish off its opponents, but I liked it. There's just something so appealing about hiding behind tons and tons of defenders and flinging FIRE out at your enemies while doing so.
Honorable Mention - zerotimestatechamp - Support the Army
Support is nothing but counterspells, basically. Army is nothing but Relentless Rats, basically. By god, I like the way you think, 0-time.
And now, the top 10.
10 - Orbrack - Ancient and Tiding
Score- 19
One of the curious things about this challenge that really surprised me was that the limitation I placed on "no sharing spell types" didn't really hurt most of the decks. In fact, it made them BETTER for many builders. Witness Orbrack, who originally turned in two decks that shared spell types. When zerotimestatechamp pointed out the error, Orbrack fixed it, and made his deck pretty scary. Ancient has a bunch of modular creatures. Tiding supports Ancient in a number of ways, including cloning its modular creatures, counterspelling, and throwing umbras down. It was a simple and effective fomula- those damned modular creatures are pesky. Orbrack is on the board with his first top 10 appearance.
9 - quiller - Two Headed Screw You and Two Headed Screw You 2
Score- 19.5
A familiar formula during this challenge was Control, control, control for one deck, plus some win condition on the other deck. quiller not only has the most evil of this kind of control deck (it can win by itself thanks to Isochron Scepter ), he also put together a very solid beatdown deck for the purpose of winning. quiller has a second top 10 appearance; we last saw the Q in the Sadism challenge.
8 - squire1 - kill em all and let me sort em out
Score- 21
Oh look, Squire has yet another top-10 deck. The Deckbuilder Lord (he gives all other deckbuilders +1/+1 and Intertubeswalk) comes at us with one deck that wraths, and another that is VERY interested in what's in the ol' graveyard. One of the more drastically effective decks entered in the competition; it was very difficult for anyone to beat. This is Squire's 14th top-10 appearance, and the fourth consecutive challenge in which he's appeared in the top 10.
7 - NoWai - Im just here to Storm
Score- 21.5
The "Storm" deck is as you might expect it to be- full of storm spells. The hilarious way of making those spells do severe damage is by having more or less every zero or X cost spell allowable. You'll basically always get a storm with 7 extra copies as soon as you can cast it (or more, given the presence of Reliquary Tower and Spellbook ), and that will usually go most of the way, if not all the way, towards killing your unfortunate opponents. A great second top-10 by NoWai, who we also last saw in the Sadism challenge trying to kill people with Razor Boomerang, which is not difficult to do because it is the best card Wizards has ever printed.
6 - lotusreport - Empty Mind and Empty Body
Score- 22
Empty Body has 4 lands, and that's it. Oh, and also Barren Glory. And then a bunch of artifacts and such that you can immediately sacrifice or cast for X = 0, thus killing them. But how to get that Barren Glory onto the battlefield? Why, with Empty Mind, which will probably Show and Tell it for you if you ask nicely. And it might even back you up with a suite of protective spells while you're at it! A pretty creative and effective combo deck from Lotus, who nets a second top-10, the first coming from the Menagerie challenge.
5 - $ªmHεiπ - VigilantStasis
Score- 24.5
You know what, I'm not going to even say anything about these decks. That's what's awesome about them. You just see the names and you know you're in trouble. This is Samhein's 6th top-10 appearance, another winner from this crafty veteran.
4 - SocialistElite - Some Quick facts
Score- 25
Some Quick is one badass deck. Leyline of EVERYTHING. And then you drop Sterling Grove. And Opalescence. Good luck with that. It doesn't even really need 'Facts to screen it with its mad, mad, mad collection of artifacts, but it certainly helps. This team produced severe glee in those playing it just because they got to start by dropping so many leylines. Good times indeed. Socialist has his 3rd top-10.
3 - landot - twins and sniwt
Score- 26
twins makes you draw cards. It makes you hurt when you draw cards. Then, you have more cards, but less life. Then sniwt makes you discard cards. It makes you hurt when you discard cards. Then, you have no cards, and even less life. Then, twins makes you draw cards. landot has created a truly poetic way to kill opponents, a vicious circle ringed in rusty barbed wire. A classy way to get on the board with your first top-10, there, landot.
2 - zerotimestatechamp - DoubleR and DoubleD
Score- 28
Boil and trouble. DoubleR has every card that copies a spell (except Wild Ricochet, I think), plus some counterspells, some defensive pieces, and the occasional Jace, the Mind Sculptor just for kick. DoubleD has x spells. Profane Command for 6? Have another one on the house. Gelatinous Genesis for 7? How about I copy that once, or twice, or maybe actually three or four times? Good game, and an awesomely creative idea as well. zerotimestatechamp has his second top 10.
1 - Zylo - Cops and Robbers
Mortal. Combat.
MORRRTAAALLL KOMBAAAAAAAT!
Cops mills the hell out of Robbers. Robbers gets 20 creature cards in the graveyard almost immediately. On turn 4, Robbers drops Mortal Combat and wins. You could try to counter it, but Cops also comes standard with an arsenal of counterspells of its own. So good luck with that. Nothing beat this deck during playtesting. NOTHING. It was merciless and awesome and incredibly creative, everything that a #1 deck should be. Zylo snags a very well-earned Master Deckbuilder title in his very first top-10 appearance. Well done to you, sir.
Leaderboard
Minimum 3 top-10 appearances.
1st Place & Deckbuilder Lord (Gives other deckbuilders +1/+1 and Intertubeswalk): squire1 - 14 top-10 finishes, 2 Master Deckbuilder titles, average finish of 6.29
2nd Place - TAMA - 9 top-10 finishes, 1 Master Deckbuilder title, average finish of 3.89
3rd Place - blueclay - 7 top-10 finishes, 1 Master Deckbuilder title, average finish of 5.43
4th Place - Zanven - 6 top-10 finishes, 1 Master Deckbuilder title, average finish of 6.00
5th Place - $ªmHεiπ - 6 top-10 finishes, 0 Master Deckbuilder titles, average finish of 5.60
6th Place - Illiad - 5 top-10 finishes, 0 Master Deckbuilder titles, average finish of 5.60
7th Place - Dr. McMeen - 5 top-10 finishes, 0 Master Deckbuilder titles, average inish of 6.00
8th Place - I_Call_BS - 4 top-10 finishes, 0 Master Deckbuilder titles, average finish of 6.75
9th Place - luckyfirefox16 - 3 top-10 finishes, 1 Master Deckbuilder title, average finish of 2.67
10th Place - SocialistElite - 3 top-10 finishes, 1 Master Deckbuilder title, average finish of 4.33
11th Place - Siegfried - 3 top-10 finishes, 0 Master Deckbuilder titles, average finish of 4.67
12th Place - Darkness1835 - 3 top-10 finishes, 0 Master Deckbuilder titles, average finish of 7.67
Next challenge.
Welcome. The rules are these.
1- Your deck must be legacy legal. Go here if you don't know what that means:
http://www.wizards.com/Magic/Magazine/Article.aspx?x=judge/resources/sfrlegacy
2- Your deck must be based around one or more very, very, very bad and/or silly cards. I mean really bad. I mean Razor Boomerang for STARTERS. And it has to be LEGITIMATELY based on that card or those cards. No just throwing in a Razor Boomerang into some random other deck. And remember that the more your deck is based on the bad card, and the more it crazily turns it somehow into a GOOD card, the more I'll like your deck.
3- You will be judged on the usual three criteria of creativity (original idea?), effectiveness (does it win?), and theme adhesion (did you stick to the main theme or idea of the challenge well?).
4- Deadline is the end of Wednesday, October 13, though if you get it in right after that, no big deal, though you risk me actually being proactive for once and grading the decks at the stroke of midnight, which I HAVE done once or twice before.
5 - Limit three entries per user.
Good luck, and remember, Zephyr Spirit ftw.
And squire1 , the guy who has what 4 articles about making a horrendous card great, is the first to submit anything..... Big surprise there lol.
At any rate, thank you KC for the comments on my cops and Robbers!
September 29, 2010 11:02 a.m.
yeah I had to do it. If KC needs to discount these I will submit new ones
September 29, 2010 11:33 a.m.
My question is what constitutes a bad card? some people may look at certain cards as terrible, hile others are in love with them.
I looked up on google the top ten worst cards and one of them was Game of Chaos . Is this a bad enough card to use?
September 29, 2010 1:08 p.m.
@Zylo: I'm using Gatherer to look up cards with a community rating less than 1 star. It's not necessarily perfect, but it's been okay so far. Game of Chaos came up with about a 3.3 rating, which seems about right to me, and cards like Goblin Rock Sled are down around where they should be.
September 29, 2010 1:38 p.m.
Alright, thanks! Where do I find Gatherer? I always just used magiccards.info
September 29, 2010 2:39 p.m.
exarkun809 says... #11
Boom!
flashy-enchantress
When I started playing MTG, I saw Mesa Enchantress and said, "Worst. Card. Ever."
September 29, 2010 3:25 p.m.
Can we get a definition on 'bad card'? Is using a Gatherer Community rating of less than one acceptable?
Personally, I LIKE Mesa Enchantress , and it goes great in Rabid Wombat /Uril, the Miststalker decks.
September 29, 2010 7:29 p.m.
Caley Krazy ideas are gunna be my death 1 st submission...tho i not sure if the card qaulifies Monstrous Hound
September 29, 2010 8:12 p.m.
KrazyCaley says... #14
How bad the card is: something I will be judging on my own subjective perspective. Feel free to argue in your deck description why you think the card is so bad.
September 29, 2010 9:38 p.m.
Lies do not become us Lyre lyre pants on fire. Also eyes.
September 30, 2010 1:34 a.m.
I know where the poison is! And you thought Leeches was meant to be used defensively...
September 30, 2010 2:03 a.m.
No one withstands the machine. Sometimes the wall must become the cannonball?
September 30, 2010 2:53 a.m.
zerotimestatechamp says... #19
Cut that Swamp Path!. Now Elvish Pathcutter is a winner!
September 30, 2010 2:57 p.m.
razor-boomerang-ftw??? 2nd the win condition is more or less pinging but i use the boomerang as a killing object
September 30, 2010 8:02 p.m.
daemonheart777 says... #23
Mold Demon Swarm well it doesn't look like a bad card until you get into the details :D
October 1, 2010 12:54 a.m.
leon_raymond says... #24
deck:challenge-deck:-razor-boomerang
Makes Razor Boomerang slightly useful
October 2, 2010 2:22 a.m.
burnin-down-the-houses
I don't care if you have no walls. Dwarven Demolition Team is STILL going to own you!
October 2, 2010 12:45 p.m.
zerotimestatechamp says... #26
Lapis Lazuli Talisman in my deck Lapis Lazuli
October 2, 2010 1:50 p.m.
killroy726 says... #27
would Goblin Charbelcher work? if so heres my deck The charbelcher rises again
October 2, 2010 2:50 p.m.
xeratheenigma says... #28
i thought i'd give this a shot heres my entry Suicidal Tendencies
October 2, 2010 3:39 p.m.
My guess would be things that can easily be abused in some form of engine (Mesa Enchantress and friends) or playable combos (Goblin Charbelcher rears its potential-first-turn-kill head in the eternal formats every so often) probably wouldn't pass that test very well. Same deal with niche stuff like Renegade Doppelganger . But that's just me.
here's something to chew on:
first submission -
October 2, 2010 11:39 p.m.
Mind Bomb is my card in Nuke to the Face, my first entry.
October 3, 2010 6:58 a.m.
Uses a Donate and Illusions of Grandeur combo.
October 3, 2010 4:50 p.m.
http://tappedout.net/mtg-decks/were-not-in-kansas-anymore/
Essentially I'm bringing back the deck I first started playing with, using elves to combo Obelisk of Undoing and Tornado .
October 5, 2010 1:34 p.m.
zerotimestatechamp says... #34
break-it-open using Break Open as a key component of victory.
October 5, 2010 3:51 p.m.
zerotimestatechamp says... #35
http://tappedout.net/mtg-decks/break-it-open/
October 5, 2010 3:52 p.m.
Tularius638 says... #36
Always use Force Give your opponent Unstable Hulk , break it open during their second main phase to make them lose a turn, then use any number of cards to turn it back face down. Repeat with more Break Open .
October 5, 2010 9:22 p.m.
Second Submission, an aggro deck based off of One with Nothing :
October 6, 2010 8:50 a.m.
My final submission based off of Grizzly Bears and its various reprints.
October 6, 2010 11:38 a.m.
zerotimestatechamp says... #43
scratch break-it-open and replace it with Light my way.
squire1 says... #2
entry 1 - Nameless deck
entry 2 - I've got wood elemental
entry 3 - sorrow, so sorrow
September 29, 2010 8:52 a.m.