Pattern Recognition #31 - NWO
Features Opinion Pattern Recognition
berryjon
1 June 2017
2623 views
1 June 2017
2623 views
Hello, and welcome back to Pattern Recognition! My name is berryjon, TappedOut's resident Old Fogey and Smart Ass. I have been playing this game since Beta edition, give or take, and this series is my bringing my viewpoint to the modern era, as well as explaining why.
I also check out cards on occasion. But today is not that day.
Now, some of you may be wondering what my promise last week was. What does a Wrestling Stable have to do with Magic the Gathering?
Not much apparently.
Oh.
You don't want to hear me talk about that NWO, do you? No, you want to hear me talk about Research and Development's "New World Order". Introduced in 2008, the NWO had several primary goals, which I will address in turn. But first, I want to describe the general state of the game before the NWO hit the game.
The last three blocks before the NWO came into being were, in reverse order, Lorwyn/Shadowmoor, Time Spiral, and Ravnica: City of Guilds.
These are rightly remembered as a high-point in Magic design. The mechanics were unique and powerful, the flavor was amazing, and everything just jelled into that perfect storm of design.
So, what was the problem that required implementing the NWO?
Complexity.
Magic suffers from a problem all constantly expanding games do. Power Creep. Complexity addiction. New Card Types. As the game advances, there becomes more and more things for players to learn and understand, more cards to figure out how to interact with and the like.
And for old players like me, this isn't a problem. Half the things we see are "Oh, this is like old thing X, but with Y" and we could move on. New Players don't have this experience. You know how I talked last time about Regeneration and how it was too complex, and because of that, it has been replaced by Indestructible?
Well, that's part of the New World Order.
The first tenant of the New World Order that I will address is complexity. You see, the game can't grow too complex over time, lest it become impossible for new players to gain an interest in the game. Time Spiral, for example, was a "Greatest Hits" of Magic mechanics, it also alienated new players with all these weird one-or-two of mechanics and abilities that had no context and no comparison. It didn't help.
One of the purposes of the NWO is to keep complexity down. The first way it does this is through Rarity.
WAIT! HOLD ON! LET ME EXPLAIN WHY THIS IS A GOOD THING!
One of the ways new players are introduced to the game is through the Limited Format. That being a small and limited card pool that may be the first cards they ever see. And you know what they will see the most of? Commons. And Commons, being the cards they will see first and most of, should be understandable and easy to comprehend.
Take, for example, the card False Orders. This is a common that was printed in Alpha/Beta/Unlimited. Now, to most players, this card is easy enough to understand, though very narrow. But to a new player, how do you explain it? Would they know how to use it? I've seen people try to cast Terashi's Verdict on a defending creature, and trying to escalate what is going on through False Orders?
The New World Order intends to prevent that. Cards with a lower rarity have to be simpler in nature. Creatures don't have fancy abilities, or many of them. Cards have easy to understand effects. But as you go up in rarity, you can add more. You can make cards larger in effect as new players won't see them as often and risk being confused or alienated by these many cards they don't understand.
So, the second point, tied to the first, is that the higher the rarity, the more powerful the effect can be.
Example?
Compare the common Samite Healer and Master Healer. The first is Common, the second is a Rare. Both of these cards have the exact same effect, but because the latter is larger, it is placed at a higher rarity. Note that it's not the casting cost, or the Power/Toughness that matters - I mean, Craw Wurm is Common - but rather the scale of the effect.
And when you deal with cards like Akroma, Angel of Wrath, it gets to be Rare if only by dint of having so many abilities!
This has the secondary effect of encouraging players to buy more packs for the chance to get the more powerful rare cards for their deck, as well as helping the secondary market. But a full examination of that is well outside how this article series works.
Now, my utter disdain for Mythic Rares is known enough by people who read my previous article on the subject, but it does tie in here. You see, aside from the first five Planeswalkers in the Lorwyn block, which were printed before Mythic Rares existed, all Planeswalkers are Mythic. This isn't because they are chase cards, driving people to buy them. That wasn't the intent. No, they are at that rarity because they are the most complex cards in the game.
Imagine, for a second, you printed a 'Walker at Uncommon. What would it be like? It would be like Kamigawa again, with Legendary Creatures at Uncommon! But worse, because there is nothing else like them.
So, as much as I may dislike it, I have to admit that there is a purpose to the whole thing, and it works. It keeps the complicated and 'big' stuff as something that is a nice bonus for new players, and not something they have to deal with from the get-go. It's something they can ease into knowing they exist, but don't have slammed in their face.
Now this also extends into the block format. While working to keep individual cards away from driving off new players, the existence of Standard as a format owes a lot to the New World Order. I mentioned power creep right? Well, that's a problem in games where later cards are stronger than older cards in order to encourage older players to buy into newer sets.
Standard and the NWO exist to help balance sets across time. It does this through a concept call "Cyclical Balance". You see, Wizards knows that it's impossible to create new sets and new cards without something being stronger or weaker than other sets in part or in whole.
Examples of high points include New Phyrexia (shudder), Khans of Tarkir and Ravnica: City of Guilds. Examples of lows would include Kamigawa, Theros and ... I'm sure you guys can fill in the blank there. I don't feel like talking about Mercadian Masques.
But the idea is that while their are ups and downs, the average in any given set of Standard blocks is about the same. This is the final intent of Standard. To create a constructed environment that is neither the complicated mass of options that Modern/Legacy/Commander can become, nor the narrow confines of Draft and Sealed.
Of course, Wizards is having a problem over the past few years marketing this, but that's another subject for another day.
Alright, so I would like to think I've established what the New World Order does, but like Magic's Golden Rule (the specific card overrides the general rule), it does have some exceptions.
Like what, you may be asking.
Well, I sure you are. I mean, I'm writing this in advance and you're just reading it after the fact.
Well, let me point out something relatively recent from my perspective. Just in case you're reading this long after the fact. Do you guys know the Madness mechanic? Well, for those of you who don't, it's an alternate method of casting a card that does so by replacing the fact that you are discarding a card with Madness from your hand by casting it instead. Just read the reminder text on Alchemist's Greeting.
Madness works, despite breaking one of the rules of the game, and raising the complexity of it in the process for a couple reasons. First, it doesn't exist in a vacuum. Madness is in a block that also incorporates a lot of discarding effects and other mechanics that look at the graveyard - like Delirium and Flashback. Thus, to new players, the complexity overall is reduced because they can recognize a pattern in the way the cards work.
I'm not sorry at all.
And not only that, but the rarity-affects-complexity aspect to the NWO is also applied to Madness. Alchemist's Greeting is common. It does flat damage. Compare that to Avacyn's Judgment. While both are spells that do direct damage, the latter changes how much damage is dealt by switching from a fixed Madness cost to a variable one. Increased complexity, increased rarity.
Crew is another mechanic that works out well, both with new and old players. What if I told you that Crew as a mechanic was related to Convoke? You know, the one where you tap creatures instead of lands to help cast a spell? Well, instead of casting a spell through creatures, you're activating an ability on an Artifact - Vehicle, and you're checking power rather than colour.
It's easy enough to understand, but then you also have to deal with the existence of Heart of Kiran, that allows for an alternate Crew cost through the use of a Planeswalker's loyalty counter. And because that particular example is Mythic Rare, in addition to all the Planeswalkers, there is a commonality in the access to the more complex version of the mechanic.
To paraphrase Mark Rosewater: "If your core mechanic is not at common, it is not your core mechanic." That being, in order for a mechanic to be justifiably part of the set, it has to exist at all rarities, and not just the higher ones. Players with limited access to cards have to be able to reliably interact with it, and not just save it for the people who get lucky or buy lots of cards.
In the end, this is what the New World Order boils down to. Keep the card complexity down, and avoid power creep. Avoid making cards that are objectively better than others, and then replace those with other cards that are better still. Lava Dart to Shock to Lightning Bolt. It's alright to step back to help reset the game state overall. Yes, the old players may moan, but they aren't who you make the game for.
Just remember one of the base truisms of Magic - every set is someone's first, and everyone opens a pack for the first time. The game lives on drawing new players in, and bringing old players back after a sabbatical. You don't want to make them think that the game is unlearnable and arcane. I've seen what happens when that happens.
I'm serious. In fact, I can prove it with three words. Three words from a different game that failed to learn the lessons that Magic did.
Event, Objective, Incident.
If you know what I'm talking about, I feel your pain. If you don't, don't go looking. Madness lies that way. But not the Madness of Magic. Madness in the sense of crazyness. Madness in the sense of poor game design.
So whenever you start to complain about how a set is just boring, or the cards in it are weak, just remember that you're remembering the highs. And with the highs, there have to be lows to compensate. Make the best with what you've got, and wait for the next high point!
Oh, and here's another article for you guys to read about the NWO.
I'll see you all next week, when I talk about why some cards are repeated, and some are not.
Until then, I'm selling out! Or is that tapping out? Basic donors get a preview copy of the final article, while advanced donors get that as well as the opportunity to join me in a podcast version of the series where I talk and you respond.
I know I'm not supposed to look, but what is event, objective, incident a reference to?
June 1, 2017 1:11 p.m.
TheRedGoat says... #3
You know this actually explains why Nephalia Moondrakes makes sense at rare. Having been in the game since just before Theros, so I had never considered the fact that the card would seem really complex to someone who has never played before.
I mean, I still hate that it is a card that, after it is understood to be bad outside of a vacuum, just takes up space. However I at least understand what its true purpose is.
June 1, 2017 2:29 p.m.
jandrobard says... #4
Wee_Dragonaut I'd love for WOTC to make more cards like that at lower rarities, they require more thinking about card power level and make limited more interesting. At least, I do today. When I first started out playing MTG I loathed cards like Inkfathom Witch, cards with morph, and tribal cards because their power level was really hard to figure out. I remember that if a card was too complicated I just wouldn't put it in a deck no matter how good my friends told me it was, because I couldn't figure out why it was good. So NWO is a good idea to help new players.
June 1, 2017 6:30 p.m.
Wee_Dragonaut says... #5
jandrobard, agreed. I refused to trade for sweet cards like Living nightmare because I couldn't understand how good they were. Many MTG players, when confronted by something they don't understand, just avoid it instead of working it out. We're lazy that way.
June 1, 2017 7:28 p.m.
Redace878: Let me explain.
Events were like Enchantments. Objectives came later, and as part of their rules, were "Treated for all intents and purposes as though they were Events - except they aren't Events."
Then Incidents came along, and their rules included "Treated for all intents and purposes like Events or Objectives - except they aren't Events of Objectives."
Imagine if you had Artifacts, then Equipment and Vehicles as totally new card types - without changing any of the relevant rules.
June 1, 2017 9:39 p.m.
Winterblast says... #7
When I started playing with 6th Edition there were these symbols on the boosters, decks and torunament packs that said "starter", "advanced" and "expert". I have no idea when these vanished but before it was a lot easier for new Players to get Cards that were understandable. You just started the game? buy a starter pack. You know how to Play with the starter Cards and feel you Need to include something fancier? buy an advanced product. You think you know it all and can cope with the full set of available mechanics and rules? go for expert Level products.
Now there are no more starter sets like Portal, no main sets, only two preconstructed planeswalker decks per set and every new player is supposed to understand everything that is available. I can remember when I picked up my first tournament pack of urza's saga, which said "expert" on the packaging...it was exciting because I expected something different than in the 6th Edition, something that was more challenging to understand and also more powerful. I was not disappointed back then and I was fascinated with even the commons, because their effects were so different from what was delivered in the main set for "advanced" players. It felt good to "be able" to buy the packs with more difficult Cards and it was cool to figure out how new mechanics worked.
I think seperating the easy to understand Cards from the complex ones by sorting them into different products was a much better concept. The starter sets like Portal (I bought one of These too, but not in the beginning) also had really great Cards included, for example Winds of Change and Armageddon, so there was a reason to buy These packs too, even if you already understood the expert Level products. on the other Hand you were not confronted with too complex Cards at all if you stayed with the non-expert packs. The System with different difficulty Levels made me want to learn more rules and that's a nice Thing for beginners imo.
A side effect of including high complexity Cards as rares or mythics in a "set for noobs AND pros" is that new Players are more likely to throw away their only valueable cards in trades for absolutely nothing.
June 2, 2017 5:20 a.m.
Harashiohorn says... #8
Well that's sort of what the intent behind the masters sets vs normal sets are in terms of complexity variation nowadays.
June 4, 2017 4:21 p.m.
Winterblast says... #9
Harashiohorn the difference is that back then it didn't result in a price three times as much...as far as I remember a tournament pack of 6th edition cost the same as one from urzas
June 4, 2017 4:35 p.m.
The Masters Sets are Reprint sets, pure and simple. Chronicles, but with more cards to draw from, more to keep out and with better branding and marketing.
Chronicles was aimed at new players. Modern/Iconic/Vintage Masters is aimed at the older players.
June 4, 2017 9:11 p.m.
EldraziSliverPhyrexian: NO! Horrors beyond horrors await you there!
June 4, 2017 11:20 p.m.
Darthagnon says... #13
EldraziSliverPhyrexian (and anyone else wondering), after a bit of research, I believe the referenced game from the article is the "Star Trek Customizable Card Game". (Sorry, berryjon)
More info:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Trek_Customizable_Card_Game
http://www.trekcc.org/
June 5, 2017 10:17 a.m.
Darthagnon says... #14
RE: Objectives and Incidents in the Star Trek CCG, see also:
http://www.trekcc.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=16990
June 5, 2017 10:21 a.m.
Darthagnon: Such bad design! A game where the flavor text was given mechanical effects!
I still loved and played the hell out of it when I was younger.
Wee_Dragonaut says... #1
I miss cards like Inkfathom Witch and Curtain of Light Good read.
June 1, 2017 12:53 p.m.