Aww, sorry man. I'm just not qualified to comment on EDH, so you'll have to settle for a +1.
June 6, 2014 3:41 p.m.
@Minelia5 I dont know, I just thought it was a good placeholder and was clear it wasn't supposed to be there. Look! now it's drooling ball.
June 7, 2014 12:05 a.m.
Take out both Ajani Vengeant s as 1) you can't run more than one card of a particular name in you deck, except basics, Relentless Rats , and Shadowborn Apostle , 2) he has red in his cost which clashes with the color of your commander.
June 7, 2014 2:55 a.m.
I'm mean seriously, I know the pictures in the description are shiny and distracting, but could you TRY to take note of the text in between them?
June 7, 2014 3:37 a.m.
Ajani Vengeant is not allowed because your commander is not red, blue, white. Nor are red producing lands legal. I don't know if you know this. Just thought I'd tell you.
June 7, 2014 8:04 p.m.
@Mac97 @Raphiezar
Jesus Christ...
Alright, since everyone seems to not care enough to read the description, Let me spell it out:
The two AJANI VENGEANTs are PLACEHOLDERS for BREGO, KING ETERNAL and RESOLUTE ARCHANGEL, which are not in the TappedOut database yet.
I like to use off color PW's as placeholders because A) There are usually not that many of them in a commander deck, B) they have their own section so I'm not miscalculating my land base because of the two Mountains that shouldn't be there and C) they show up in the deck's color wheel, which makes it clear at glance that something doesn't belong (which I'm pretty sure is all you two did when you felt obligated to look at my deck, Glance).
Please, next time, before you deign to lecture me about the rules of magic, if you could just take 30 seconds to look for a reason for what your seeing, I'd appreciate it. Thank you.
I mean, for Christ's sake, I've practically memorized the comp. rules, and I have four EDH decks on my profile. I know how to play the game.
Now that that's out of the way, does anyone have any constructive criticism?
June 7, 2014 9:01 p.m.
I would remove the following Talisman of Progress because you don't really need the pain for only 2 mana types. Taj-Nar Swordsmith it costs too much. Thats all I have time to suggest for removal now.
June 7, 2014 11:31 p.m.
Chaos Orb by the way is $70 that's why it costs some more.
June 7, 2014 11:38 p.m.
I am willing to help with this, if you want my help. By the way I'm sorry for the hasty comment. I don't think the third degree was needed, but it was my bad.
Minelia5 says... #1
Is it intentional that you have a Swamp as a commander, although your deck has no swamps? Nice deck anyways. +1
June 6, 2014 3:38 p.m.