Esper Transcendent

Modern* Neo7hinker

SCORE: 159 | 138 COMMENTS | 45096 VIEWS | IN 72 FOLDERS


Neo7hinker says... #1

Yes, you can definitely still control in a midrange.

November 10, 2016 5:09 p.m.

Apakakuta says... #2

I use some midrange threats but my deck doesn't have goyf or such and most of my creatures are utility.

November 10, 2016 5:14 p.m.

Neo7hinker says... #3

I've seen it and it looks sweet. I agree that you don't 'need' Goyf just because it's one of the best cards, especially if your list isn't designed to maximize its effectiveness.

November 10, 2016 5:24 p.m.

Apakakuta says... #4

If you actually look at my game winning "threats" I have 2 Tas 1 Tombstalker 2 kalitas 2 and 3 Liliana the Last Hope. I would consider 7 creature threats and 3 walkers a control amount of threats.

November 10, 2016 5:29 p.m.

Tethys says... #5

My brother and I just put your Esper Narset deck up against his Esper Dragons deck. We were going to do a best out of three, but the first game went to turn 34. Ugin, the Spirit Dragon was able to wreck your formidable board state, but multiple Timely Reinforcements kept you in play long enough to finally kill the Dragons deck with the Colonnades.

+1 for the great matchup and nice build! I'm sure my brother would appreciate a +1 if you are a fan of his apparently quite effective budget Dragons deck.

Happy brewing!

November 10, 2016 6:04 p.m.

Neo7hinker says... #6

I upvoted his very interesting deck! Thanks for testing it! What did you like most? Least? Did you notice how many options and interactions you have?

I'm also considering 2 Oath of Gideon. The card certainly has good application here. Narset would start out at 7 loyalty and be bumped to 8 upon resolution. 2 turn clock.

November 10, 2016 11:18 p.m.

Apakakuta says... #7

would oath be better or worse in this deck than lingering souls?

be an interesting card to test for your walker heavy deck that is for sure bud :)

November 10, 2016 11:33 p.m.

Tethys says... #8

Neo7hinker -- The deck's early game disruption you are running is definitely effective. I wasn't sure that Esp. Dragons was going to be able to recover, but all of those Temples were actually able to scry me into ideal responses. Elspeth, Sun's Champion and Gideon Jura are able to do some serious work together against a control deck. I needed sweepers and sacrifice and lifegain effects from Crux of Fate and Foul-Tongue Invocation just to stay alive. Once Narset hit the board on top of Elspeth and Gideon, it became clear how effective the superfriends combo really is. Lucky for me, I topdecked and Ugin after dropping my eighth land.

Path to Exile worked really well against the Dragons, but Lingering Souls was surprisingly underwhelming without Intangible Virtue or any other oaths. I failed to hit Sorin, obviously, which probably would have been a different story. I think it would be interesting to run your Esper deck against my B/W Tokens deck for a fun, grindy game. Maybe something to consider if you have time.

November 11, 2016 1:48 a.m.

CrazyPete says... #10

Here's my Esper Spirits list I'm working with right now. Still testing it out and making changes with. Very much in flux. Just added Aether Vials, had serum vision in before. http://tappedout.net/mtg-decks/26-10-16-esper-spirits/

November 11, 2016 12:11 p.m.

luke1 says... #11

I wonder how you classify your own deck as "competitive".

November 14, 2016 3:28 p.m.

Neo7hinker says... #12

Competitive as in it performs well vs Tiered decks, not that it's a Tier 1 deck. Competitive as in it can simply compete and isn't designed solely for kitchen table and FNM play. It was developed with the meta in mind. I intend to take this to a GP.

November 14, 2016 3:42 p.m. Edited.

luke1 says... #13

You should wait for the results of the GP then to know if it's competitive or not.

November 14, 2016 3:50 p.m.

Neo7hinker says... #14

You're misconstruing it, bud. If someone shared a quality list that had a focused design, consistent gameplan, and was relevant against the top decks, I'd consider it a competitive deck, regardless of how it performs at X event. There are great decks that don't always put up the same performances at events due to variance, match ups, etc. For instance, Ali won a GP with GR Tron last year, then went to GP Charlotte and opened up 0-3 (I believe) vs Burn/aggressive decks. That result didn't make the deck any less competitive. That's all I mean by the reference.

November 14, 2016 3:56 p.m. Edited.

Apakakuta says... #15

luke1 a deck does not need to be known to be competitive. Remember eldrazi winter? That deck was an idea by a few people it was competitive and was new. Just because someone makes a new thing does not make it any less competitive. Last year Zac Elsick came up with Lantern Control was that a deck yet? No but it was competitive. All Neo7hinker is trying to tell you is that someone's rogue deck can be competitive without being a known tier deck.

November 14, 2016 4:34 p.m.

Neo7hinker says... #16

Exactly, Apakakuta. Thank you.

November 14, 2016 8:12 p.m.

luke1 says... #17

Of the decks that write competitive in the title only 1 in a hundred (maybe) is actually competitive.

November 15, 2016 1:33 a.m.

Apakakuta says... #18

A lot of people don't tag their decks properly doesn't mean you need that is always true. If one apple in the Orchard is rotten is the entire orchard bad?

November 15, 2016 1:42 a.m.

hunkers says... #19

What do Apples have to do with the subject at hand?

November 15, 2016 2:22 p.m.

Apakakuta says... #20

hunkers It is an anology a metaphor. Way of explaining by using something most people should know.

November 15, 2016 2:28 p.m.

hunkers says... #21

Justmessing

November 15, 2016 2:36 p.m.

jaccjacc says... #22

Hey Neo, +1

I will try out The Esper Charms as well as the 2 of Blessed Alliance. Your arguments are valid, If you have the luxury of rebounding a charm it gets insane. I took out Cryptic Commands for it. Whats your position on Cryptic? Once I had a Planeswalker out and cryptic up i felt almost invulnerable, 3 cryptics were all the counters i ran.

This is what i'm currently on http://tappedout.net/mtg-decks/08-11-16-Rhq-esper-control/

Absolutely love Negates, having them mainboard is never bad, every deck plays relevant non creature spells worthy of countering. My thinking Cryptic over Negates: Negates usually become relevant T4+ which would allow you to keep up cryptic. However Negate lends itself to playing something up to cmc 2 and keeping up negate (with 4 mana up)I will definitely try them out and report how they're working out.

Even though you said the collective brutality is low impact, i will keep playing them for a bit. They fit so well in the deck. If manage to play relevant lines with the card I'll let you know.

November 15, 2016 3:51 p.m.

Bovine073 says... #23

luke1 tiers do not reflect competitiveness, just the amount of metashare the deck has (although those correlate with each other).

November 16, 2016 9:06 a.m.

Bovine073 says... #24

luke1 tiers do not reflect competitiveness, just the amount of metashare the deck has (although those correlate with each other).

November 16, 2016 9:06 a.m.

RingweMakil says... #25

I might recommend Extirpate over Surgical Extraction, since paying a mana only really stops you from going turn 2 Extraction into Snapcaster Extraction; I imagine split second would be relevant much more often. Deck looks amazing, planeswalkers galore!

November 16, 2016 11:09 a.m.

Please login to comment