I like it so far. +1

Maybe use Hellspark Elemental for early game aggro, then recur him when World at War rebounds.

Now there's a solid idea! Thanks man!

Got the deck breakdown all set up and it's in the feature queue. Thanks for the help guys!

You forgot about Spark Elemental. He's all lonely now.

He's not lonely, he got roided up and is going by the name Hellspark Elemental now, because Hellspark is a 1 drop in this deck.

Right.

I thought they banned roids in Magic when they passed the "No Having Real Fun" Law. lol

He found a supplier on the DL.

There are a couple of things you might want to change in the description. Nova Chaser exiles the Elemental, not sacrifice. And the card returns when it leaves play, not when it dies. It would be different if it said "sacrifice" and "dies".

Freakin' awesome picture btw. It makes me want to play this deck more and more.

Roger that, changing it now.

Hell yeah, Kil'Jaeden was always one of my favorite characters from the Warcraft lore. Even before WoW was ever a thing.

And he fits the role of this deck perfectly. Fire and badassitude, all in one. What's better than that?

I would posit, nothing. Nothing is better than that.

How do you add an image on the site like on a profile? I'm having a hard time figuring it out.

You need to upload it somewhere so you can refer to its link in code. Photobucket will actually generate the HTML code for anything you upload automatically. Then you just copy and paste it in.

Thank you, I figured it out.

Oh crap. Another sky-high rocketing deck by sagarys...

Just kidding man :) Like it, though am sort of confused by Kazuul, Tyrant of the Cliffs...

I'm open to suggestions to replace him! Though I like him for the reduced price and his ability to bring creature decks to a halt.

Suggestions... WARNING, this suggestion is going to sound really weird. Instead of the two ogres, put in two more Incandescent Soulstoke. Then take out two lands and put in two Liege of the Tangle. If you cheat him out with the Soulstoke, you'll have an army of 8/8s because the lands stay that way even when he leaves the battlefield. It's obviously a calculate risk though, so if you don't want to do it, I won't be surprised.

Hmmmmmmmmmmmm...

That is...

Interesting....

I like it.

It does raise the price of the deck a fair bit though and I'm not sure I like 22 lands when I'm shooting for World at War on turn 5. I'm gonna have to playtest it a little bit. But I like it. I like it a lot. It's just silly enough to be awesome. Especially when a wall of lands attacks during World at War.

True, it is a bit more expensive. If that's above your ideal budget, then don't take it in.

If anything, you could only put one of them in and still have 23 lands.

(Sorry for the double post, just thought of it)

No worries.

I do it all the time.