TheWanderer123 says... #2
Oh, sweet, what matchup do you think you will do the best against and what matchup do you think you are scared of the most? If you dont mind me asking.
October 9, 2014 7:06 p.m.
TheRedDude says... #3
my best matchup is slower decks, and i dont like mono green or grull or temur fatties
October 9, 2014 7:09 p.m.
Lol Red Bridge Wins as a catchphrase! Can't wait to see a primer on red bridges in Standard...
More seriously now, your list appears to me as a Boss Sligh post rotation heir rather than a Red Deck Wins, as it is heavily based on heroic triggers and secondary synergies like tokens pumping the Denizen (and you only pack 17 mountains, its most distinctive feature imho). Not sure it will be as effective an archetype now without Madcap Skills , Legion Loyalist , or Firefist Striker and every blocker-neutering spell you pack being in your SB... As for me, I prefer an (efficient critters)+(burn spells) approach, with a less explosive start but more mid resiliency, (you have seen my deck Yet another Rabble Red fall 2014), and I also have built a boros aggro deck entirely focused on triggering heroic, The Expendables 2015.
Against fatties (green devo hydras, gruul dragons or hydras, temur whatever), I'd suggest 2-3x Act of Treason in the SB. With the speed of your deck, a turn 5 Act of Treason on their just-managed-to-cast-a-fatty-threat-via-mana-dorks-and-rampers could probably be lethal...
Let us know how the deck performs! Red Bridge wins!
October 10, 2014 4:58 a.m.
TheRedDude says... #5
right, because Hammerhand dont neuter blockers. I'll try it
October 10, 2014 6:45 a.m.
sorry, my bad, i totally skipped Hammerhand MB.... good luck and please post performance!
October 10, 2014 9:32 a.m.
ToTheMaxTG says... #7
I suggest you add anotherWar-Name Aspirant and another Goblin Rabblemaster .
October 10, 2014 8:11 p.m.
this article examines the deck thinning effect:
http://magic.tcgplayer.com/db/print.asp?ID=3096
Every article written in defense of the thinning effect I've seen was basically "don't trust mathematics simulations; they are too narrow; in my experience the thinning is indeniable"...
October 11, 2014 11:51 a.m.
I played against a similar deck today. Very fast paced! Not much I can say about it, it's good, especially for this format.
October 12, 2014 12:41 p.m.
PreZchoICE1 says... #17
Flamespeaker is so underwhelming in this std. Far too many answers for it to be effective. Its a lot of fun and a great card for casual. Imo it shouldnt have a spot in any deck seeking to be competetive. Chances are you'll push more damage with whatever you take out to put him in.
October 12, 2014 5:31 p.m.
Dragonmasteroftheworlds says... #19
Not bad yourself dont know what to suggest but hey if it works. It works then. + 1 upvote
October 12, 2014 5:46 p.m.
more land. 17 is way too little, you will never get gobin rabblemaster out
October 12, 2014 6:35 p.m.
TheRedDude says... #22
After testing for two weeks, i have found that 17 is the perfect number and can get him out nearly every game. most pros would agree
October 12, 2014 6:39 p.m.
TheRedDude says... #23
also, ive tried both and determined that i dont need Valley Dasher and Impetuous Sunchaser kind of stinks in a deck like this
October 12, 2014 6:41 p.m.
PreZchoICE1 says... #24
17-20 seems right for an aggro deck such as this tbh. Your curve is super low so it should b ok 95% of the time.
TheRedDude says... #1
actually, im bringing this to game day
October 9, 2014 7:02 p.m.