OMG; sorry, I totally forgot this thread was Pauper... sorry for that.

@Abubroki: Lol all good man

Hey BMpatrol, can you check out my deck, and tell me if its good?

Mono-Green Infect Booyah! Turn 2 and 3

I prefer Briar Shield over Llanowar Augur. Both have upsides working for them.

@BMpatrol,

I see you've removed the Llanowar Augur? I though this was a central card in your deck. How does it turns out without it?

Hasn't Invigorate been recently banned in Pauper?

Abubroki : Yes it is.

BMpatrol : I'm going to test the deck this weekend :)

Rancor

Invigorate is banned in pauper

So not to rain on your prade but invigorate is banned in Pauper...

@mrdeathkills and @Stull thanks for the heads up, yeah officially banned on MTGO but I had to double check at the card shops I play FNM at, they have the same feelings about it in Modern/Pauper so it's out for 4x Apostle's Blessing

Take a look in my deck Infect, I studied much about Infect in Pauper (and you helped me with your deck)

http://tappedout.net/mtg-decks/13-01-16-mono-green-infect/

I think my deck very consistent.

I really like this deck. It is. Very good for your version of pauper and $25! +1 upvote. P.S. I do know that top tier pauper is $50-70.

Im reading all of this and laughing my butt off, hate to tell ya dude but Invigorate is 100% legal in pauper.

@RasKitsune: Well, seeing as how the Pauper format was popularized by MTGO, I'm working off of their banlist featured on the Wizards of the Coast site.

Id recommend going of legality on this website.

Even on a mulligan in testing, I managed to go T1: Glistener Elf, T2: Rancor, Rancor, swing for 5, T3: Swing for 5 with Giant Growth in hand to push through more infect if there's a blocker.

RasKitsune No one wants to see a pauper deck that isn't allowed on MTGO. Most pauper players play on MTGO. They want the deck to be legal in both paper and MTGO.

Also, for BMpatrol, you should take out Titanic Growth and replace it with Giant Growth. Don't move Titanic Growth to the sideboard. In place of those 4 slots, I'd recommend adding Tormod's Crypt (Yes, it was printed as a common once in Chronicles.)

@Nasa1225: Thanks for the playtest :D Glad it met your expectations!

@lonker: Thank you!!! I haven't been feeling too good about Titanic Growth but haven't come across a good way to swap it out! Okay, 4x Giant Growth is going in, and Tormod's Crypt seems good but are you sure there's enough need for graveyard hate to run 4? I feel like the biggest threats in Pauper are Delver, Affinity, and maybe Burn. Perhaps 2x Tormod's Crypt, another Nature's Claim and then another Ranger's Guile? What do you think?

BMpatrol Ok, maybe this:

• 2x Tormod's Crypt

• 4x Gitaxian Probe

• 3x Nature's Claim

• 3x Ranger's Guile

• 3x Magnify

Hornet Sting isn't really strong in pauper infect to be honest. But Magnify can stop a lot of cards people put in their sideboard, such as Electrickery and Shrivel

I'm starting to feel kind of sick...

Pauper lonker

1 VIEW

Here's my take on Pauper infect. The sideboard and description aren't complete, but I feel that it might give you some ideas.

this IS a pretty quick deck, if anyone wouldn't mind, i too am learning the ways of infect and wondering anyone would be so kind as to give me a few pointers in how to improve my deck Golgari Infection

would Tel-Jilad Fallen be of use to you?

I built pauper infect too, but I opted for the green blue version. The only two creatures I run are Glistener Elf and Blighted Agent, I also run Aqueous Form.

Due to the prevalence of Chainer's Edict, Vitality Charm seems really strong. You could cut Predator's Strike for the space