Walking Fridges And Stuff

Commander / EDH PepsiAddicted

SCORE: 374 | 379 COMMENTS | 89802 VIEWS | IN 217 FOLDERS


PepsiAddicted says... #1

yeah trading post (it was in an early version btw) is sick but there is only so much room in a deck, right ;) and to please the goat-god i put in springjack pasture. always ready to make that required sacrifice. I OFFER YOU THIS GOAT, OH GREAT ONE!

nono the sideboard and the maybeboard are different (its explained somewhere in the wall of text above; ignore this). i have two fake sideboards for this deck. not really SB ofc, more like different versions for different playgroups. or it used to be like this. recently i mainboarded some of the cards from the "evil stuff"-sideboard (like winter orb) because even the noobs reached that certain lvl of "we-all-play-Jokulhaups-now".

May 21, 2016 7:25 p.m. Edited.

lagotripha says... #2

Im my playgroup Prototype Portal found a home as a source of more stuff when hands were empty. Not sure if it'd be excellent here, but it should be good.

July 9, 2016 6:01 a.m.

PepsiAddicted says... #3

its a great card, it was in an older version of this list (i just realized its still listed in he combo section... gotta fix that some day). you can run it in a list like this imo, but it is a bit narrow for my taste. with karn around you can do the same and more with mimic vat.

July 9, 2016 6:23 a.m.

Lhurgyof says... #4

True enough, and the higher CMC can make it annoying. Unless you manage to pop an artifact land or sol ring on it.

July 9, 2016 3:45 p.m.

lagotripha says... #5

I was running a lot of stuff like a Coretapper, Banshee's Blade, Energy Chamber, Ratchet Bomb, and the ever fun Jinxed Choker. Jinxed choker alone made games politically hilarious, but when you have 3-4 of them?

July 9, 2016 4:16 p.m.

PepsiAddicted says... #6

thats pretty cool

July 9, 2016 4:21 p.m.

aekrusty says... #7

Nice deck +1. Could you review and upvote my St Traft Azorius Duel? Thanks

August 16, 2016 7:09 a.m.

Vinman says... #8

@PepsiAddicted

Thoughts on vehicles and any of the artifacts in Kaladesh? I don't think vehicles work at all in this deck (maybe Smuggler's Copter but not really).

October 1, 2016 4:01 p.m.

PepsiAddicted says... #9

hey vinman... yeah i dont think so, too

October 2, 2016 2:23 a.m. Edited.

could you share your html for making the background image show up like you have on all your decks with the translucent description/comments boxes? thanks in advance for any help.

December 18, 2016 10:46 p.m.

PepsiAddicted says... #11

hey i didnt do the html stuff myself and its stored on a google drive i dont even know how it looks. but there are plenty of threads here in the forums

December 19, 2016 2:12 a.m.

i've looked through the forums for hours and can't seem to find what you're referring to :( what do you mean you don't know how it looks? could you share the google drive with me or the thread where this formatting is discussed?

December 19, 2016 2:19 a.m.

PepsiAddicted says... #13

thats not how this works.and i really dont know where uve been looking if u cant find anything on the topic. there is even a whole subforum on coding.anyway.. it was made by the_dragonmaster like a year ago. no idea if he still does it. but hes super nice, asking cant hurt

December 21, 2016 10:26 a.m.

I have found where it was discussed last summer and the code that supposedly worked then is essentially the same code I had already tried. this is the link to the specific discussion: http://tappedout.net/mtg-forum/coding/how-do-i-put-in-art-in-the-background-of-my-deck/

However, that code doesn't work for me no matter what I do and a number of other people have stated in various places that their full page deck descriptions have ceased functioning too.

December 21, 2016 2:06 p.m.

PepsiAddicted says... #15

first of all i dont know if the owner of that dropbox in your forum link really wants you to use his code. and 2nd.. it works. where is the problem. just tested it.

December 21, 2016 3:05 p.m. Edited.

idk, you and ender both seem to have no problem but no matter how many times i recheck my copying of the code it won't work for me. i also don't seem to be able to properly get an html link to work like this

ender's page

so maybe i just am not understanding some fundamental part of html. well nvmactually that worked. huh.

December 21, 2016 4:24 p.m. Edited.

NarejED says... #17

Poke poke. Great looking deck. The formatting is spectacular. It looks like you put a lot of time and dedication into it.

Do you by any chance have, or know of, a Karn list tuned for competitive play? I've been browsing around for one and there doesn't seem to be much in the way of such resources. Since you have so much time dedicated to Karn, I thought you might know of a few good resources.

January 31, 2017 4:08 p.m.

PepsiAddicted says... #18

i can tell you no matter how strong you build your karn deck it will never be a viable option for a real competitive meta. protecting your artefacts from an oponent (or even multiple oponents) who knows what hes up against is nearly impossible. you can have those really fast and explosive starts but if you cant combo to win every1 will focus you (obviously). you have very limited options to interact with your oponents. and most importantly you wont be able to keep your enemies from casting one mass artifact removal after the other... (if you wreck them on day 1 theyll be running 15 more of those the next day)

it is still sooo much fun to play. it can be super strong. its different. i can only recommend Karn. best in slot

February 2, 2017 3:19 a.m.

Daedalus19876 says... #19

Amazing deck. Horrible page layout, no offense - the transparent comments make the text really hard to read against the background.

It's a shame you can't play the Legacy Weapon here :(

March 20, 2017 7:06 p.m.

PepsiAddicted says... #20

daedalus yes its kinda true. i didnt make the design, i have no clue about coding and im happy to have it ;)

yeah legacy weapon would be great for lore reasons

March 27, 2017 5:02 a.m.

Savaaage says... #21

Pepsi, do you still run Steel Overseer in your 99? If you do, what would you replace it with in this current list?

April 3, 2017 5:41 a.m.

skeletonkey8 says... #22

What do you think of -Planar Portal +Planar Bridge

September 10, 2017 12:23 a.m.

Sterling0528 says... #23

Can someone explain to me why portcullis is in th deck? Seems pretty bad to me and more detrimental to the game plan.

March 31, 2018 5:03 p.m.

Lord_Europa says... #24

Weatherlight wouldn’t have to be crewed thanks to karns ability and can be effective at digging for stuff... could fit in nicely

January 29, 2019 5:18 p.m.

PepsiAddicted says... #25

Sterling0528: strong card in here. this deck mostly plays noncreature artifacts so it doesnt affect me alot while it stops every creature based strategy. and if theres not enough creatures on the battlefield to trigger portcullis karn can animate a few things on instant speed

Lord_Europa: i didnt have time to look at any new cards since early 2018. didnt really had time to play since then. but it sounds right and lorewise the weatherlight should be in here anyway

February 2, 2019 3:53 p.m.

Please login to comment