Mono-black

Modern hollandboys

SCORE: 160 | 329 COMMENTS | 48027 VIEWS | IN 90 FOLDERS Top 8: 07/12


martin286 says... #1

maybe you can swap Garruk Relentless  Flip for Vraska the Unseen , that would give you a way to deal with Thalia, Guardian of Thraben , all PW and Olivia Voldaren :)

December 13, 2012 3:43 p.m.

Weston Ayarza says... #2

Just kind of random suggestions as they fit with the theme.Phantom General ? and Increasing Devotion ? maybe as a 1 of on devotion.

December 16, 2012 6:59 p.m.

hollandboys says... #3

Both good cards with unfavourable mana costs. The only thing with that is once I'm up to 4 or 5 mana I'd much rather be dropping planeswalkers, Thragtusk , or Sigarda, Host of Herons .

December 16, 2012 7:02 p.m.

Weston Ayarza says... #4

Yeah agreed, Thought I'd make the suggestion anyways. xD

December 16, 2012 7:10 p.m.

theonyc says... #5

wow, new name. not sure i like as much. either way its a good deck, whats your worst match up? and how did you do on friday?

December 16, 2012 7:34 p.m.

theonyc says... #6

sorry i forgot it wasn't every week

December 16, 2012 7:34 p.m.

hollandboys says... #7

Ya I just changed it today, new names generally get more views. I haven't really determined a "bad" match up yet. The only decks it has lost to at all is selesnya aggro and grixis control (only because my buddy plays grixis control and we play so many games against each other it's generally 50-50 I'd say). I will be bringing it to standard this coming Friday and will report on how it does

December 16, 2012 9:17 p.m.

theonyc says... #8

makrs sense, I'm righting on kindle fire and it keeps on architecting me. what do you think of a baby beat down deck? I have the cards and seems fun

December 17, 2012 1:06 a.m.

theonyc says... #9

sorry, supposed to say auto correct and bant instead if architecting a knob baby

December 17, 2012 1:07 a.m.

theonyc says... #10

a knob= and

don't ask how

December 17, 2012 1:08 a.m.

hollandboys says... #11

Make the deck and I'll take a look

December 17, 2012 1:48 a.m.

Wabbbit says... #12

Liked the other name better :/.

December 17, 2012 2:08 p.m.

hollandboys says... #13

Alright alright the people have spoken, the name will be changed back

December 17, 2012 2:11 p.m.

shadowmonkey says... #14

sweat deck, i play tested it and looks crazy

December 17, 2012 2:20 p.m.

Wabbbit says... #15

Cool :P. Is the people juts me? :D.

December 17, 2012 2:20 p.m.

hollandboys says... #16

theonyc also didn't like it as much and honestly I didn't either. Thanks shadowmonkey, it is playing quite well lately.

December 17, 2012 2:23 p.m.

Lustrigia says... #17

You changed the name because you're a little bitch.

December 17, 2012 2:30 p.m.

hollandboys says... #18

I like this name better, it's a good song

December 17, 2012 2:32 p.m.

Willebeer says... #19

AWESOME

I tried to build this with minimal budget and less than the desired amount of hard rares. I will try to fashion mine like yours. Well done!

December 18, 2012 12:09 p.m.

hollandboys says... #20

Thanks. Ya it's kinda hard to make a deck like this on a budget. it's really just an all or nothing situation with the lands and whatnot. Once you finish it let me take a look

December 18, 2012 2:04 p.m.

CallMeCrazy says... #21

I think Arbor Elf would work better then card:Avacyn's Pilgrim with the shock lands and what not.

December 21, 2012 2:44 a.m.

theonyc says... #22

not true. arbor elf kind of sucks in this deck. he only has 8 good targets, and the only reason you would play him is if you need double black or double green. but every card requiring black/green only needs one (except garruck and colective blessing), so he is pointless and makes it a lot lest stable

December 21, 2012 5:40 a.m.

Hope they reprint Birds of Paradise :D

December 21, 2012 6:21 a.m.

Very well built deck. I likes.

December 21, 2012 6:25 a.m.

Stein_ says... #25

This thing looks perfect now dude. Don't go changing anything. Go, I took my zombies to control. Check it out. Liliana's Revenge. Its on my front page

December 21, 2012 7:39 a.m.

Please login to comment