Battle of Wins!

Modern megawurmple

SCORE: 1469 | 534 COMMENTS | 85483 VIEWS | IN 90 FOLDERS


megawurmple says... #1

That's fine by me. Although, as you say, you may need to edit the list for casual play.

April 28, 2014 5:20 p.m.

CkajLanoa says... #2

Great, thanks!

April 28, 2014 5:39 p.m.

CkajLanoa says... #3

I made the twin deck under the title of I'm so witty.

May 1, 2014 7:50 p.m.

veritates1 says... #4

I don't want to sound like a know-it-all, but wasn't the competitive tag MADE for Storm Crow ?!

May 2, 2014 8:29 a.m.

dsagent says... #5

Step 1: Play islands.
Step 2: Play Battle of Wits
Step 3: Opponent screams IMPOSSIBRU!!!!! and explodes.

May 2, 2014 5:07 p.m.

Chadowboy says... #6

Have you considered something like enter the infinite then anything to shuffle your graveyard into your library ? And maybe some draw... It could get you more chances to get battle of wits and a deck with over 200 cards if you can shuffle your graveyard in your library.

May 6, 2014 5:51 p.m.

Dude he's right... Enter the Infinite would make this deck even more broken, despite the nombo with Battle of Wits

May 6, 2014 8:23 p.m.

Now it would be pretty crazy if you had 111 Islands and 111 Mountains so that Countryside Crusher could win. Of course, he'd be only a 19/19 so that Storm Crow can win the game. Of course, this doesn't work too well with Battle of Wits though... And it would be 109 of each land...

May 11, 2014 1:32 p.m.

atlantis55555 says... #9

sorry to be this guy but you can also check out my Battle of Wits deck battle of wits is really O.P.

May 17, 2014 8:07 p.m.

spike2016 says... #10

Can you please take this deck of this site? Everyone is showing up to my FNM and casual kitchen table games with 230 card decks that just crush everyone and I'm losing interest in MTG because of it. As it is, I've been ripped off on EBay because of this deck. "4x Storm Crow ...only $.99 plus free shipping!" they said. Yeah right. Nobody sells Storm Crow that cheap. As it is, I recently had a few cards stolen from me. They left the Planeswalkers....they left my playsets of fetch lands alone.....they stole my Storm Crow . My only copy of Storm Crow ....gone. I can't even tell you (because of Tappedout's terms and conditions) what I had to do to get that Storm Crow . You posting this deck is like Tesla trying to give away free energy all over again....another +1 from me.

June 6, 2014 7:12 p.m.

dsagent says... #11

I think of this deck at night when I am all alone and no one is looking.

June 7, 2014 4:39 p.m.

IgorKlown says... #12

SO AWESOME!

June 15, 2014 1:07 a.m.

lanimilbuS says... #13

Too bad Trench Gorger isn't legal in modern :(

June 17, 2014 6:04 p.m.

lanimilbuS says... #15

It's called sarcasm.

June 17, 2014 7:13 p.m.

megawurmple says... #16

What are you talking about Jdvanliew? Battle of Wits is one of the most OP cards in the game. With this card in play, you win by simply having cards in your library. How is that not overpowered?

June 17, 2014 7:39 p.m.

spike2016 says... #17

Someone better give me back my d@mn Storm Crow . Sorry to keep posting, but I can't help it. This deck calls to me in the night.

June 17, 2014 7:46 p.m.

InCtrl says... #18

You should add the tag Eldrazi and Battlecruiser for the mightiness that is Storm Crow.

June 21, 2014 6:13 p.m.

Am i the only one who play tested this???

June 21, 2014 6:39 p.m.

lanimilbuS says... #20

Nope.

June 21, 2014 7:32 p.m.

tgcchallenger says... #21

It is just too darn expensive of a deck, otherwise everyone would be playing it.

June 21, 2014 7:39 p.m.

JakeHarlow says... #22

I think Jdvanliew missed the playset of Storm Crow on the main.

June 22, 2014 9:16 p.m.

daemon_panda says... #23

Too expensive for me to play.

June 22, 2014 10:07 p.m.

freyhackbarth says... #24

SWAG

June 23, 2014 1:51 a.m.

hiddengibbons says... #25

why not Augury Owl or Invisible Stalker instead of Storm Crow ? I mean, is this thing serious? Of course I'd probably just scoop as soon as the crow hits the table anyway. No doubt about it; he's The Truth.

July 14, 2014 4:21 p.m.

Please login to comment