24 lands and 16 creatures is way too many for infect. Ideally you would have 12 infecters, 20 lands, and the rest pump. The Llanowar Augur could be replaced with Giant Growth and take out 4 Forest for Rancor.

I'd say it's still too many lands if you have max CMC

Yeah probably, say if you know any good buffs I'm missing

Apostle's Blessing in the main deck. Not only protects you from interactive spells but if you run across a bad combat trade.

what should i take out then?

I don't know how much removal is played in pauper, but I think that Vines of Vastwood is much better than Seal of Strength for the main board.

Is Gitaxian Probe banned in pauper? If not play it as well. Information is so important with infect. Probably cut 2 Forest and 2 giant growth.

ok, but if i put Vines of Vastwood in I am not taking out Seal of Strength because apart from Glistener Elf it is my best turn 1 play as you can use its ability whenever. Also Gitaxian Probe is not banned so i might put it in. Thanks

May consider Briar Shield.

I used to have it in the deck and it is good, but there are better things. also it cant be a turn 1 play like Seal of Strength because you need the creature.

Immediately take out Naturalize for Nature's Claim

Invigorate is banned in pauper.

I don't even know what to say.

A: I don't play pauper

B: Infect and I have a love-hate relationship (and I'm not really familiar with infect anymore).

Seems solid for a pauper infect deck though.

too bad Invigorate is banned in pauper format

As majorappliance and darkmatter32x said, Invigorate is banned in Pauper.

Predator's Strike is a great card for infect based strategies. It is multi-purpose too. It can evade burn spells, adding defense to your creature, because it is an instant. It can also allow your creature to get through blockers with Trample.

I also like Blossoming Defense a bit more than Vines of Vastwood because it doesnt cost extra for the buff. Its really preference though.

PickleNutz, I would love to put Blossoming Defense into my deck but unfortunately it isn't legal in pauper because it is uncommon.

Oh yeah, stupid pauper rules. Haha, well... you could always grab a black marker and pretend... claim it was reprinted. Right?

Invigorate is banned.

Just so you know, Invigorate is banned in pauper, contrary to what tappedout seems to think.

Just letting you know before you comment that I know that Invigorate is banned but the people that I play with allow it.

"Since Pauper is a Magic Online specific format, it does not extend to physical cards. Therefore the term Paper Pauper is used to distinguish it from its MTGO counterpart.Paper Pauper has also no official banlist"
-mtg.gamepedia

thought about using Necropede?

gdm1989, no I haven't since it is banned.

invigorate is banned - yea only online, but every tournament and player respect this bannlist, so this is not pauper deck. Please change it to casual.

Predator's Strike could be a good addition and/or replacement for the "banned" Invigorate. The trample it gives could be the how you infect your opponent though their creatures. Nice deck! Upvoted.