I think that's way too OP. Maybe have some sort of clause to balance it out. Casting anything for free has some sort of balance.
July 5, 2015 1:41 p.m.
What if it said, if you do, you can cast any other spells this turn.
July 5, 2015 1:46 p.m.
Sure, but that's really wordy. How about, no search, but cast a tricolored spell for free.
July 5, 2015 1:47 p.m.
NoviceMagician says... #5
I always thought the words "shits," and "giggles" should never be used in the same sentence.
That said, she is too overpowered. What about, for shits and giggles, it is:
"At the beginning of your upkeep, search your library for a Magic the Gathering card. You must play the first Magic the Gathering card you find. If hat card doesn't win you the game, tough shit."
EDIT- I'm so freaking tired right now. I'm gonna go sleep.
July 5, 2015 1:56 p.m. Edited.
Daedalus19876 says... #9
Way, way, way, way overpowered. Conflux breaks that card in half, along with a bunch of tutors.
Maybe something like a slightly modified Dream Halls?
"Discard a card: Add X mana in any combination of colors from the discarded card's color identity to your mana pool, where X is the discarded card's mana cost."
Or something like Elemental Resonance: "At the beginning of your upkeep, you may reveal a card in your hand. If you do, add mana to your mana pool equal to the total colored mana in the revealed card's mana cost."
SirFowler feel free to correct my wording of course :)
July 5, 2015 3:09 p.m.
Trust me, I play Dream Halls and it is completely broken. I'm surprised it isn't banned. If you don't think so, check out my mono-blue edh deck and you'll understand why. Just discard one blue play to cast Omniscience, Enter the Infinite, or even a draw spell that lets me draw more than one card. If that wasn't ridiculous enough, I have a Laboratory Maniac in there.
Anyway, I think you should definitely mix it up a bit. Maybe something like:
~
, tap: Discard a card with converted mana cost 3 or more. Each player may search his or her library for a card with converted mana cost 3 or more that shares a color with the spell discarded this way and puts it into their owner's hand. Then each player who searched this way shuffles his or her library.
4/4
Idk, that may be underpowered, but at the same time I'm not sure about it. I really don't know on this one.
July 5, 2015 4:01 p.m.
Daedalus19876 says... #11
Oh, Dream Halls is extremely broken. That's why the version I gave does something similar but less broken, only allowing you to cast something of lesser mana cost easily, and not abusing color overlap.
July 5, 2015 5:25 p.m.
The_Dragonmaster says... #12
Okay NoviceMagician I think this is da final reaper.
Da Reaper Show
July 5, 2015 7:13 p.m.
NoviceMagician says... #13
Yeah, that's fine The_Dragonmaster, I'll add it to the commander spoiler. Thank you. :)
I think the 5-color commander is just too overpowered an idea to even nerf or fix.
July 5, 2015 8:04 p.m.
The_Dragonmaster says... #14
The five-color commander seemed extremely OP to me until I saw the noncreature spell part. But still that is a 3 mana Conflux or any of the Ultimatomatoes
July 5, 2015 8:31 p.m.
Mine is here:
:
3/3, other creatures get -1/-1. Whenever another nontoken creature another player controls dies, you may choose one: That guys controller loses 2 life, or you lose 1/draw 1, or you gain 2 life.
Commander Tourney Deck by Maringam Playtest
Commander / EDH
SCORE: 0 | 0 COMMENTS | 26 VIEWS
July 5, 2015 9:17 p.m.
NoviceMagician says... #17
Hello Maringam and welcome. Good to have ya here. :)
Well, that commander looks fine to me, so I'll go ahead and add it to the list of commanders in the commander spoiler. And thanks for the deck, I'll add it to the list I've been keeping.
Well everyone, we are now at 11 participants, 5 spots left.
July 5, 2015 9:25 p.m. Edited.
My only problem with Muramasa is that he fucks over my commander. And seems a little bit strong otherwise, but eh, Night of Souls' Betrayal exists so I'm not going to complain. That much.
July 5, 2015 10:09 p.m.
Daedalus19876 says... #22
I don't care with my current list, but a cheaper, better legendary Massacre Wurm seems...pretty damn good.
But it's still not as broken as several of these commanders are turning out. So I'm okay with it.
July 5, 2015 10:16 p.m.
@Maringam Your link appears to be broken. I see your commander on your deck list page, but you might want to fix the link for Novice.
July 5, 2015 10:27 p.m.
NoviceMagician says... #24
Already done SirFowler.
I'm 1/2 steps ahead of the game. ;)
Raze999 says... #1
For shiz and giggles, what do you guys think of her?
July 5, 2015 1:21 p.m.