That might work. Also, again I'm nitpicking, but you need to add a comma after 'combat'. Other than that, I feel like it works.
July 2, 2015 1:13 a.m.
I hate OCD so much. It has hindered my ability to see the world world as it is rather than just trying to fix everything. sigh
The comma is misplaced. D:
Edit: Disregard this comment. I got ninja'd XD
July 2, 2015 1:17 a.m. Edited.
Daedalus19876 says... #9
Templating still looks odd, seems like it should be written something like this:
Haste
Creatures you control get +1/-1.
At the beginning of each player's combat phase, they choose one of their opponents at random. Creatures they control attack the chosen opponent during that combat if able.
But its costing is better now. And it lost that odd self-recursion ability. It might also be interesting at 1WBR with +2/-2 and as a 4/3 or 5/2, compared to Zurgo Helmsmasher and Ruhan of the Fomori for reference.
July 2, 2015 1:25 a.m.
I have a second commander im working on if anyones interested
July 2, 2015 1:35 a.m.
@Daedalus19876 Your wording sounds even more confusing. On Ruhan, it doesn't actually say combat phase, only combat. Combat phase is only referred to when you add phases or when you skip phases, such as Aggravated Assault or Stonehorn Dignitary.
July 2, 2015 1:35 a.m.
How's this for the wording of Khudul?
~
Haste
Other creatures you control get +1/-1.
Each player has "At the beginning of combat on your turn, choose an opponent at random. Each creature you control attacks that player if able."
5/4
Thoughts? Cause the way it was worded, Khudul would have been a 6/3 for 5 mana and haste. As for the secondary effect, I basically copied Ruhan of the Fomori's text word for word, up until the each creature part.
July 2, 2015 2:16 a.m.
Daedalus19876 says... #13
That's pretty clear, actually. Odd to have the "Each opponent has", but it actually works decently well. I think that either of our wordings would have worked, though.
July 2, 2015 2:24 a.m.
Khudul looks good. Elf person from before looks flippin' busted in half.
July 2, 2015 2:41 a.m.
canterlotguardian says... #15
Don't know how to put images into comments so I'll post the text here. It's not complicated.
Farekh, Manipulator Mage ()
Legendary Creature - Human Wizard
At the beginning of your upkeep, proliferate.
, : Proliferate.
2/4
July 2, 2015 7:49 a.m.
6tennis, you're the first person I've seen who dislikes Tymdall. Care to explain?
Also, Farekh seems quite strong. Profilerate is already strong, and with access to Doubling Season and Ral Zarek, and strongest infect cards, it feels like the deck could be extremely strong and almost OP. Maybe edit the upkeep ability a bit?
July 2, 2015 9:02 a.m.
Daedalus19876 says... #17
The proliferate general is WAY strong, because I've already playe against a proliferate deck in EDH.
I'd be fine with it, honestly, if we knew Magistrate's Scepter wasn't in the deck. Too easy to break in half :P
July 2, 2015 9:29 a.m.
canterlotguardian says... #18
Maybe something like:
At the beginning of your upkeep, choose up to three creatures you control. Proliferate those creatures.
Or something like that? So it can't be used in artifact shenanigans like Magistrate's Scepter?
July 2, 2015 10:50 a.m.
Only problem is that you can't use the profilerate ability word with that ability, due to the way proliferaye works. Try: at the beginning of your upkeep, choose up to three target creatures. For each type of counter on those crestures, you may add an additional counter of that type.
July 2, 2015 10:55 a.m.
canterlotguardian says... #20
Now can you explain how to embed an image in a comment? No one's told me yet D:
July 2, 2015 10:57 a.m.
There's a button. It looks like a mountain with a sun beside it, just add the image URL and you should be fine.
July 2, 2015 11 a.m.
NoviceMagician says... #22
Alright, I got a (bad) night of sleep, but I'm here now.clet's go over what I missed shall we?
@Raze999, should say "other creatures you control get +1/-1." Other than that, seems fine to me. You can change the wording if you want to, but I understand just fine how it is, so changing the wording is up to you.
@canterlotguardian, sorry, but that guy is way too strong. Having the activated profilerate seems less broken, but cost should go up by 1. The automatic upkeep profilerate needs to go though, perhaps something like, "choose up to three creatures you control with a counter on them, then put another counter on them of a kind already there." Other people will probably have to help with the wording on that a bit. Also, for inserting images, you can also do this:
<img src="IMAGE URL GOES HERE">
@6tennis, why?
@SirFowler, I'll link this page on my profile page.
@Daedalus19876, I'm about to make the commander panel.
@JA14732, because I didn't want to leave anyone out of this post.
@Magicrafter, same reason.
Alright everyone, that all being said: Could I have the url to each of your commanders? The picture that is.
EDIT- Totally didn't forget to tag you KalvinHobbez. XD
July 2, 2015 11:45 a.m. Edited.
HolyFalcon says... #23
Creature side: http://i.gyazo.com/75ec1b01567d9cf79739dfdbe03a4bf2.png
PW Side: http://i.gyazo.com/26c2eb47126248717d0892b9b6120135.png
July 2, 2015 12:02 p.m.
I fixed that other creatures thing on khudul thanks, i also have a second commander if anyone would like to see or try it
July 2, 2015 12:05 p.m.
NoviceMagician says... #25
Go ahead and post it Raze999, and thanks Magicrafter
Raze999 says... #1
At 6 mana removal all it takes to shut him down i feel
July 2, 2015 1:06 a.m.