Casual Mono Red Dwarf Tribal

Casual Lutachris23

SCORE: 79 | 52 COMMENTS | 10898 VIEWS | IN 39 FOLDERS


DBCooper says... #1

awesome tribal.

February 16, 2015 4:48 p.m.

SirPeriwinkle says... #2

How about Collateral Damage instead of fling? Only costs 1 instead of 2

February 18, 2015 3:41 p.m.

For Ironforge?! +1

March 1, 2015 11:44 a.m.

Tyrannosary says... #4

this isn't even tribal legal.

March 3, 2015 8:15 p.m.

Lutachris23 says... #5

What do you even mean?

March 3, 2015 10:42 p.m.

JohnnyBaggins says... #6

10/10 would play. Seriously considering buying this just for the fun of it!

March 5, 2015 8:26 a.m.

Clones16 says... #7

@tyrannosary tribal means tht AT LEAST 1/3 of the deck has to share the same creature type and in this deck it does soo u no nothing!!! great deck tho looks fun but honestly i would wanna add in Hall of Triumph

March 12, 2015 9:02 a.m.

Lutachris23 says... #8

Thanks I'll consider it!

March 12, 2015 9:26 a.m.

Evan2297 says... #9

I think I'm actually in love with this deck.

March 15, 2015 12:33 p.m.

DBCooper says... #10

Roiling Terrain would be cool with the land-destruction mechanic. I seriously am crazy about this deck. good work.

March 29, 2015 8:59 p.m.

Lutachris23 says... #11

I do like the suggestion, but I don't know what cards I would take out to replace it.

April 1, 2015 6:39 p.m.

Omnomalisk says... #12

Is this deck standard? Might buy the cards if it is.

April 15, 2015 9:10 p.m.

flavor-boner is a thing, right?

April 15, 2015 9:21 p.m.

Omnomalisk says... #14

Ignore my last comment :P

April 15, 2015 10:45 p.m.
April 15, 2015 11:02 p.m.

TreeCat says... #16

May 31, 2015 11:39 a.m.

Lutachris23 says... #17

Adding Lightning Bolt would raise the price by about 50%... I'd like to keep the deck under $30 if possible, and this deck isn't meant to be competitive, though it can be.

May 31, 2015 12:51 p.m.

TreeCat says... #18

Bolts are around one dollar, at least at my lgs. Assuming we are talking about mm2 bolts that is.

May 31, 2015 2:56 p.m.

Lutachris23 says... #19

I'll look around! If they're cheaper than I expected, I'll put them in!

June 1, 2015 11:38 a.m.

brother1 says... #20

Dwarven Bloodboiler seems like it could be good in this deck.

June 2, 2015 12:43 p.m.

Lutachris23 says... #21

Yeah it would!!! Thanks for the suggestion!

June 2, 2015 3:34 p.m.

narthan11 says... #22

I would put the Fling back in because it has some really good synergy with Dwarven Bloodboiler you just tap all your creatures, make a dwarf huge and chuck it at your enemy for 2 mana

June 3, 2015 4:24 p.m.

Lutachris23 says... #23

Yeah I did even more testing on the deck after adding it and you're right!

June 4, 2015 3:34 p.m.

catrule3564 says... #24

I love the deck, but I think that cutting Dwarven Recruiter is incorrect. Ensuring that you draw nothing but spells for the rest of the game is awesome.

June 11, 2015 11:06 a.m.

Lutachris23 says... #25

I've play tested Dwarven Recruiter and it happens far too often that I don't need another creature

June 11, 2015 11:45 a.m.

Please login to comment