Sorry, no card can be "good" or "bad" in a vacuum. It depends on the cards in which you play it in conjunction with.
But, as a reasonable person, I'm willing to humor you. Tell me whyWanderer is better than Mummy for this deck.
Anyone can say one card is "better" than another when put side by side, but if my wincon doesn't include my opponent losing life every time a creature enters, then no sir, a "ETB tapped" chump blocking Wanderer is not superior to a wincon supporting Mummy for this build.
While you're here, tell me again why I should put more 3 cost spells in here as well? Look at my curve, and tell me, would more 3 cost creatures speed this deck up, especially after you suggest more 1 & 2 drops? No.
If you can't give me reasons why a card will work better, then you don't understand what the deck does.
Magic the Gathering, FNM is TM and copyright Wizards of the Coast, Inc, a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc. All rights reserved. This site is unaffiliated. Articles and comments are user-submitted and do not represent official endorsements of this site.
TheSurgeon says... #5
BobTheStrong- "Dread Wanderer is better than Tattered Mummy."
Sorry, no card can be "good" or "bad" in a vacuum. It depends on the cards in which you play it in conjunction with.
But, as a reasonable person, I'm willing to humor you. Tell me why Wanderer is better than Mummy for this deck.
Anyone can say one card is "better" than another when put side by side, but if my wincon doesn't include my opponent losing life every time a creature enters, then no sir, a "ETB tapped" chump blocking Wanderer is not superior to a wincon supporting Mummy for this build.
While you're here, tell me again why I should put more 3 cost spells in here as well? Look at my curve, and tell me, would more 3 cost creatures speed this deck up, especially after you suggest more 1 & 2 drops? No.
If you can't give me reasons why a card will work better, then you don't understand what the deck does.
May 16, 2017 8:37 a.m. Edited.