Treasure Hunt should be banned!!! (now w/ discord)
Modern
SCORE: 540 | 280 COMMENTS | 67251 VIEWS | IN 369 FOLDERS
Lowenstein says... #2
Actually, UnknownDemon, you are losing to 51 lands. The Seismic Assault wouldnt be there if it wasnt for the 51 lands, because first off I would have no mana to play it, and second none of the combo pieces would even be there, for if there were less that 51 lands, the deck would not be legal, seeing it would have less than 60 cards. Also, how do I do damage? With a whole bunch of lands. Using 4 lands, I can play the Swans and the Assault, and using that draw my whole deck, consisting of 51 lands, using each land to do damage. I am sorry, it must be humiliating, but yes, you are losing to 51 lands. So take cover, but I recommend you not ride golden dragons in the mountains, because that erupting fire fist of doom is coming for you next :)
January 6, 2015 12:22 p.m.
UnknownDemon says... #5
Dr_Moosh Seismic Assault deals damage not the lands so im not losing to 51 lands besides you only need 10 lands to inflict 20 damage so why discard 51?
January 8, 2015 9:02 a.m.
Lowenstein says... #6
I know Seismic Assault deals the damage.... It's a joke, got that? And because overkill. Much fun is overkill.
January 8, 2015 10:37 a.m.
Lowenstein says... #7
However, you may say that you lose to the Assault, but you also lose to the deck, and me, and the deck is partly 51 lands, so you are partly losing to them
January 8, 2015 10:44 a.m.
For some reason when playtesting this deck I only end up wit 21 cards in the library before the draw...
January 9, 2015 9:49 a.m.
Lowenstein says... #9
Maltanis I am having the same problem, and so are others, I think that it isn't counting the full-art lands as cards. I think I will try showing them all as basic
January 9, 2015 9:51 a.m.
where are your four gemstone caverns ? I have built a different version of this deck and the caverns let you play your treasure hunt turn 1, and if your cards are right (no pun intended) assault turn 2, and the win on 3
January 24, 2015 1:09 p.m.
HolyFalcon says... #13
Cool deck, +1. I think this would be really fun to annoy some friends.
January 24, 2015 1:23 p.m.
blackice1399 says... #14
Hey, the foil basics are showing up in the playtester. Switch all of them!!!
February 2, 2015 10:57 a.m.
marioman77 says... #15
What about a couple counter spells on sideboard ? for if you play a blue deck
February 5, 2015 11:26 a.m.
What do you think of adding a few Dispel's to the sideboard for going against against heavy control decks?
February 5, 2015 6:35 p.m.
Lowenstein says... #17
I have tried everything with the lands, but they won't show up in playtester. Sorry everyone :(
As for things like Dispel in the sideboard, that is good. I just don't want to right now :/. Don't have any.
March 9, 2015 9:24 p.m.
sorry I skipped through most of the comments when I checked back in on this deck (I looked at it a while back) so I was wondering why you have Swans of Bryn Argoll
March 10, 2015 3:08 p.m.
couldn't you Treasure Hunt into Swans of Bryn Argoll and ruin your combo
March 10, 2015 5:42 p.m.
How would you play this turn by turn I would like it if you put that in the description
March 12, 2015 6:15 p.m.
Programmer_112 says... #24
On behalf of Dr_Moosh:Treasure Hunt into Swans isn't ideal, but considering the sorts of hands you should be keeping, that shouldn't be too bad even if it happens, which is unlikely. Also, soon, a play guide will be added.
March 12, 2015 9:30 p.m.
I'm mostly confused on which you play first and what type of hand you should keep
UnknownDemon says... #1
No i never thought i would lose to 51 lands and i propably never will. If you win me with this deck, im losing to Seismic Assault not to those lands.
January 6, 2015 11:07 a.m.