Treasure Hunt should be banned!!! (now w/ discord)
Modern
SCORE: 540 | 280 COMMENTS | 67251 VIEWS | IN 369 FOLDERS
Lowenstein says... #2
sonnet666 yes, I know, look at the latest deck update please, or at the link above the big picture
June 3, 2015 3:13 p.m.
Try inputting the lands as snow-covered lands or Seat of the Synods and Great Furnaces. They're the same for play-testing purposes. Just put a note at the start of the description explaining why that's a thing.
June 3, 2015 3:28 p.m.
Your play tester is acting weird. You only have 35 cards in total. Can you give a link to one that works? Or is that for TO to figure out?
June 3, 2015 3:36 p.m.
Lowenstein says... #5
Look, my deck is being really weirds, I have changed the basics before, and it still didn't work, and I don't want to mess with it anymore.
Please read the last update or go the link above the picture.
June 3, 2015 3:41 p.m.
change it so that there are no foils. Because the play tester will only put in the foil versions of cards if there is even just one foil.
June 3, 2015 4:23 p.m.
Will you consider Sphinx's Tutelage as an alternate win con when origins goes live ? Because I will :)
June 23, 2015 4:29 p.m.
@Marenkai: The problem with that is that it still doesn't get around Leyline of Sanctity, and it dilutes the amount of cards you draw off of Treasure Hunt. Plus you need to have it down before you start drawing lots of cards, otherwise it might not actually mill your opponent out.
June 23, 2015 4:38 p.m.
Dragonman39 says... #16
I love decks like this that have a ridiculous build structure that most folks would laugh at but it still busts heads! +1!
June 27, 2015 5:48 p.m.
hoggyhay222 says... #17
I just got my butt kicked in a 4 way Modern Game with this deck. Of all the jank that we each were playing, this was the best xD
June 27, 2015 5:51 p.m.
Dragonman39 says... #18
Oh, if you are worried about Leyline of Sanctity you could sideboard some Kiora's Dismissal. It's a quick 1-drop that would allow you to pull off your land discard combo.
June 27, 2015 5:51 p.m.
Lowenstein says... #19
Haha yeah this would suck 4-way, and thank you for that suggestion
June 27, 2015 6:27 p.m.
Now this might be overkill, but what would you say to removing 2-4 of something, replacing those with Skred and then changing all of your basics to snow-covered basics?
July 1, 2015 1:12 p.m.
The deck's suppose to win on turn 4. At that point Skred would only deal 2 or 3 damage, tops. What's the point?
July 1, 2015 1:53 p.m.
For a Leyline of Sanctity sideboard:
Allows you to still combo off the same turn you play Swans of Bryn Argoll if there's a Leyline out (Leave 1 or 2 cards on top of your library for Manamorphose.), and they all have some utility anyway if there isn't.
Maybe throw in a Pact of Negation to protect it from counterspells.
July 1, 2015 4:26 p.m.
Have you tried the deck on mtgo? I've tried it there with a cheaper mana base, 1 sulfur falls, 1 steam vents, no temples (I am trying Halimar Depths in there to see if the rearrange top 3 is any good in the deck) and had a few people quit because of it haha, is the deck hated in your meta?
I am tempted to try it on the daily events to see how it does.
July 10, 2015 10:49 a.m.
Lowenstein says... #25
No, I have not tried it, but I would like to sometime, I just don't currently have the money to get cards on that. You should try it though if you can!
sonnet666 says... #1
There's something off about the playtest on this deck. It only loads 35 cards...
June 3, 2015 3:40 a.m.