You should run 2 blind obediance cause you cant really get any extra effect outta 2 let alone 3 and skullcrack isnt worth running 2 because if you need it game 2 and only side in 2 there is a real good chance you ll never see it. Run at least 3 if your going to run it and 2 obediance. you can spot good cards but your placement needs balance.

Burning-tree emissary is better mainboard for you cause it imeadiatly pays flinthoof boars cost and you could have 3 bodies with a 3/3 haste on turn 2. much much better than gyre and cheaper.

And yes you can use burning-trees free mana turn 2 on gore clan rampagers bloodrush and cast it on you turn 1 creaure who is now a 5/5 or 6/6 trample till turns end. I'm not sure you know how bloodrush works if you think alchemists refuge is nesessary.

Yea I was doing BTE and ghor clan for awhile in fact. I decided to drop down to 8 two drops, boar and sage, and I originally added 4 Loxodon Smiter but just today changed him to Wolfir Avenger . I fell into the trap of jamming smiter in because that's what everyone else is doing.

And also I actually do know how bloodrush works, you can't play an emissary and then save the 2 mana for your attack phase. Try reading more.

You could use the 2 mana for a Titanic Growth if you want. The only way to bloodrush off emissary mana would be to use card:Alchemist's Refuge to cast the emissary during combat, or flicker it with Restoration Angel .

To the issue of "one Boros Reckoner on each side of the table":

Both Reckoners will be dealt damage at the same time, afterwards their effects get put on the stack in order APNAP. Thus, the not active player will be dealing the Reckoner damage first.

If you are still wondering the reason (too lazy to go get the comp ruling) why you would lose if both you and your opponent have a Boros Reckoner in play and you cast Blasphemous Act while you both had 13 or less life is because when multiple abilities are triggered simultaneously they go onto the stack in AP/NP order. Therefore, you would place your trigger first and then theirs which would make their Boros Reckoner trigger resolve first and kill you before yours got to resolve.

Ok I was wrong about bloodrush its new but my main suggestions are sound in regards to your side and mainboard tweeks. I think your side of 1/1s look like a mirror of RDWs 4x reckless waif in side its supposed to be a toolbox for tricks and cover decks your vounrable to namely R/U/W AM Control and mill and mirror and possibly flying if were talking nighthawks and desecration demons exc. Think 4 spots to 1/1s is wasteful either mainboard em or let em go. I think you dont need trackers realy you got domni raid also there wont be a color change in that swap.

no thoughts at all on Predator Ooze ? Every time you fight with him he gets bigger....great card for a fight club deck.

The ooze is good but the question is what to cut with him, no other three drops besides domri and reckoner, resto and thrag are higher, and cutting a 2 drop would hurt the mana.

for the Blasphemous Act , that is, of course.

I dunno man...i'd find room to fit ooze and pit fight in somewhere....and as much as you like it....I see this whole deck as more of a sideboard than anything...fight is great...for creature removal only. I played a boros deck I called armed robbery which focused on grabbing someone's creatures, attacking with them, and then cloudshifting or resto angeling them to make them permanently mine.....it worked fairly well until I played decks that weren't playing many creatures....or had hexproof creatures....then what? My deck was hardly working when I was stealing a 1/2 or 2/2 creature that wasn't doing shit for me. I love the concept of fight club decks, but if the opponent isn't playing a lot of creatures....you've got to hope that you have enough aggro to rush him to death. This is one of the reasons that ooze belongs in here. If he does damage, he gets bigger. Of course...if they're not playing creatures they're probably playing some kind of control, and you can expect to see an azorius charm or unsummon....:::sigh:::

well that is what the sideboard is for. Experiment One is there to sub out of I just need a dumb beater. I've been playtesting and this deck hoses aggro pretty handily, so now I need to see how it does against control.

personally i would make this an aggro deck without the fight, and add the fight cards to the sideboard. just my 2 cents bro.