Grabbing that Booty

Standard*

AndanteCrescendo

Land (22)

• 3x Canyon Slough
• 4x Dragonskull Summit
• 4x Drowned Catacomb
• 3x Fetid Pools
• 2x Island
• 3x Mountain
• 3x Swamp

Sorcery (2)

• 2x Walk the Plank

Instant (16)

• 3x Abrade
• 4x Costly Plunder
• 2x Fatal Push
• 3x Lightning Strike
• 2x Spell Swindle
• 2x Unlicensed Disintegration

Creature (13)

• 3x Captain Lannery Storm
• 4x Dire Fleet Hoarder
• 3x Marionette Master
• 3x Ruthless Knave

Enchantment (7)

• 4x Mechanized Production
• 3x Revel in Riches

---

Sideboard

Instant (6)

• 3x Negate
• 3x Spell Pierce

Artifact (2)

• 2x Sorcerous Spyglass

Sorcery (4)

• 2x Hour of Devastation
• 2x Sweltering Suns

Creature (3)

• 3x Hostage Taker

---

A standard deck built around the new treasure mechanic. As much as I wished to include Vraska and a few other of the other powerful cards in the new set, the four color divide was something I believed would be a bit too weak in my own personal meta. The landbase would include Spirebluff Canal but this simply pushes the budget I want to keep for standard up a bit too high. For now the deck has a few win-cons in the way of Marionette Master , sacrificing artifacts to consistently ping the opponent, or Revel in Riches and Mechanized Production to enable a win with a large number of treasure tokens. I'd include Annointed Processions, but this was left out for the same reason that Vraska was, as well as the cards I wanted and intended to include aside from that specific card not having any sort of white devotion. Personally I believe Costly Plunder and Ruthless Knave are better forms of card advantage than many blue sources due to my considering my focus on treasures. Negate and Spell Pierce are included in the sideboard rather than the mainboard to allow for more spawning of tokens being switched out should I need to more for control to make certain they're unable to counter my key spells. The inclusion of Spell Swindle rather than a cheaper counterspell is simply for the reason of spawning tokens with them being designated as a sub-out for Spell Pierce should I be facing a spell deck.

The sideboard predominantly includes answers for a diverse amount of threats should the already included removal be too little, Sweltering Suns and Hour of Devastation filling in for large scale removal while Hostage Taker handles removal of powerful single targets in game two, Sorcerous Spyglass being included for a similar reason.Any advice on this deck is appreciated, as it in its current state is simply a prototype.

Date added	7 years
Last updated	7 years
Legality	This deck is not Standard legal.
Rarity (main - side)	4 - 0 Mythic Rares 27 - 9 Rares 13 - 0 Uncommons 8 - 6 Commons
Cards	60
Avg. CMC	3.08
Tokens	Copy Clone, Servo 1/1 C, Treasure