Not wanting to be "that guy" but I feel the new fetches would be great to feed the grave for delve.

You have conflicting game plans in this deck.

Basically, Nemesis of Mortals and Nighthowler don't play well with Delve. You also have (probably) too many Delve cards in the list. If most of your spells have Delve, then your graveyard engines won't be able to keep up and you'll end up with a hand full of 10-drops.

tinkhan and NobodyPicksBulbasaur, thank you for your comments. I don't plan on making Delve the primary mechanic of this deck. In fact, that's why there are only three cards in it with Delve (outside of the sideboard, which still needs work. Delve is used to clear lands and/or noncreatures from your graveyard, which don't boost Nemesis or Nighthowler. Because there are only three, I don't feel it conflicts or detracts much from the deck. As for the Fetchlands, I think those are a good idea. But, I don't know what lands I should cut in order to make room for them (I like the scry that Temple of Malady provides, obviously want to keep Opulent Palace , need Mana Confluence for an alternate source of blue mana, and that just doesn't leave much room.) If you have suggestions as to how I can do that, or how to alter the sideboard, or any further thoughts on the deck, I would appreciate it. Thanks again for your comments!-PhoenixStar

For fetches you can cut basics. I totally agree with using delve to clear out any of the extra non-creature spell/lands your getting off of dredging. I totally love where the deck is going though and will continue to follow it

Thanks, tinkhan, for sticking with it! I replaced some of the Forest s and Swamp s with Polluted Delta s (and one Island ); and I think they really help.

On another note, do you have any suggestions for the sideboard? Bile Blight is there to deal with token decks, but I don't know what else to include.

Anyway, thanks again for your advice!

-PhoenixStar