I Don't Even Have to Concede [Turn 0.5 Loss]

Modern DarksteelBadger

SCORE: 244 | 78 COMMENTS | 11319 VIEWS | IN 37 FOLDERS


DarthSpader says... #1

What, no Bone Saw?

April 7, 2016 5:33 p.m.

Bone Saw is not good enough for this caliber of deck.

April 7, 2016 5:51 p.m.

OOBS says... #3

Lol, this deck is awesome. I'm going to have to try this against friends sometime XD

June 21, 2016 10:56 a.m.

Mulligans make this deck ABSURDLY consistent

June 22, 2016 12:58 p.m.

Haha... even more consistent than The Most Consistent Deck Ever Made. Sorry Mortem, I may have bested you.

June 22, 2016 6:17 p.m.

Mortem says... #6

DarksteelBadger Well... The Most Consistent Deck ever is more consistent in doing one thing only! I mean... maybe... aww...

June 22, 2016 11:04 p.m.

Wombatz says... #7

have you thought about spoils of the vault

August 20, 2016 11 a.m.

Including that would raise the Average CMC to about .06667. That is not going to happen. We have our "Kill Spells" in our opening hand consistently enough. We can mulligan to 1 after all. Besides... how would we cast it?

August 20, 2016 11:26 a.m.

Shane.Allen says... #9

I love your video, it's hilarious! Just one question, why do you want to make a deck that loses instantly?

August 20, 2016 11:41 a.m.

aekrusty says... #10

Hilarious. Lol. Nice deck +1. Would you mind upvoting my St Traft Azorius Control?

August 20, 2016 1:28 p.m.

Mario21 says... #11

Im "religiously" an edh player but i do enjoy watching other formats and looking at the decks. This deck reminds me of times i decided to say hell with it if i die im gonna give the biggest threat a helping hand. I'll give them an aura or something XD i +1 this.

August 20, 2016 1:43 p.m.

jimlandiaman says... #12

I'm pretty sure that only Intervention Pact, Pact of the Titan, and Summoner's Pact actually guarantee a first turn loss. Pact of Negation and Slaughter Pact require targets, which you might not necessarily get on turn 1 (although if you were to take this to FNM, a turn 1 creature from your opponent certainly wouldn't be uncommon).

With that aside, +1 for what is possibly the most consistent deck I have ever seen on this site.

August 20, 2016 7 p.m.

Dorotheus says... #13

Doesn't life gain make it harder to lose? Fountain of Youth and Claws of Gix still seem too powerful.

August 20, 2016 11:50 p.m.

This list has some cards you may want

August 21, 2016 12:17 a.m.

Busse says... #15

Bad list if it is missing some Bone Saws and Sigil of Distinctions hahahah

Awesomely bad deck, +1 fromme

August 21, 2016 9:23 a.m.

Daedalus19876 says... #16

This needs some Ornithopters to allow for the broken T1 "Ornithopter - Slaughter Pact" opening. Plus, you could beat your opponent to death with your consistent zero power per turn!

August 21, 2016 2:24 p.m.

Daedalus19876 says... #17

Also, you will always have a target for Pact of Negation: counter one of your own spells. It just won't lose on Turn Zero.

August 21, 2016 7:59 p.m.

hamiam says... #18

Awesome +1

August 21, 2016 11:49 p.m.

Clockwurk says... #19

Orochi Hatchery makes 1/1s. 1/1s can win. take it out.. .. ..

August 24, 2016 7:32 p.m.

@Clockwurk: I have a lot of mana to do things like that....

August 25, 2016 5:15 p.m.

Daedalus19876 says... #21

How would you recommend making a budget version of this deck, so that even a poor, broke soul like I can experience the joy of losing on T0?

August 25, 2016 5:31 p.m.

@Daedalus19876: Run Pact of the Titan, Intervention Pact, and cheap cantrips.

August 25, 2016 7:08 p.m.

Shane.Allen says... #23

Can I ask why you would ever want to make a deck that can lose ?

August 25, 2016 7:12 p.m.

Shane.Allen, I assume you also enjoy making decks that can lose. However, making a deck that purposely loses is a different story. For me, losing is such a fulfilling experience that I want to ensure that I can fail whenever I choose.

August 25, 2016 7:56 p.m.

Daedalus19876 says... #25

Shane.Allen: Because winning gets boring?

August 25, 2016 7:59 p.m.

Please login to comment