I Got 99 Lands and a Storm Crow Ain't One

Commander / EDH GoldGhost012

SCORE: 231 | 117 COMMENTS | 34150 VIEWS | IN 12 FOLDERS


Jozen1515 says... #1

now that's pretty solid but can it beat a Pillarfield Ox deck??

December 31, 2013 11:39 p.m.

K1LR0Y says... #2

ya Storm Crow has flying

January 1, 2014 12:02 p.m.

Jozen1515 says... #3

but that beats for 2!

January 2, 2014 2:08 a.m.

K1LR0Y says... #4

true the ox is pretty strong but Storm Crow controls EVERYTHING, including your ox......sorry man but Storm Crow + Snow-Covered Island s = win the game.

January 2, 2014 2:30 p.m.

vishnarg says... #5

http://www.stormcrowtavern.com/ Lets drink!!!

January 2, 2014 4:24 p.m.

GoldGhost012 says... #6

No way. The power of Storm Crow is apparent even in the drinking world!

January 2, 2014 4:30 p.m.

Stevens says... #7

80 comment. Btw Storm Crow + Island = win

January 9, 2014 1:28 a.m.

Jozen1515 says... #8

January 9, 2014 1:34 a.m.

Kozelek says... #9

This has inspired me to make a Norin the Wary deck with 99 mountains, i think that might be the only way to beat this deck ether that or run Valakut, the Molten Pinnacle as commander with 99 mountains like wise the only thing i can see to make your deck better would be a Soaring Seacliff

January 14, 2014 8:56 a.m.

K1LR0Y says... #10

Soaring Seacliff enters tapped, it will slow down the deck. Snow-Covered Island s all the way

January 17, 2014 12:42 p.m.

Kozelek says... #11

But it gives flying yo

January 17, 2014 1:21 p.m.

Jozen1515 says... #12

he has a point

January 17, 2014 3:11 p.m.

Kozelek says... #13

Oh snap this deck NEEDS Moonlace

January 17, 2014 4:50 p.m.

Nigrescence says... #14

Sorry man, but Suntail Hawk is better.

January 21, 2014 7:57 p.m.

Darkblade666 says... #15

but stormcrow isn't legendary... still great deck tho, +1 from me

January 25, 2014 12:08 a.m.

vishnarg says... #16

legendary

adjective

remarkable enough to be famous; very well known.

How is that not the synonymous definition for Storm Crow ???

January 25, 2014 12:36 a.m.

Darkblade666 says... #17

true, but it isn't legendary in the text so all the judges will get all technical with you.

January 25, 2014 8:28 p.m.

GoldGhost012 says... #18

Storm Crow will get all technical with those judges. They'll get so technical that they'll be erased.

January 25, 2014 9:44 p.m.

Darkblade666 says... #19

damn dude too badass

January 25, 2014 11:38 p.m.

SSJRanulf says... #20

I'd throw in one Steam Vents to confuse the enemy and make them think you're stupid and planning on playing something other than Storm Crow.

February 9, 2014 11:03 p.m.

randomguy123 says... #21

I feel bad for all the people who don't recognize the power of Storm Crow , the other half of the card was printed in a different set, the set with no set symbol.

Alt text

I bet this card will be reprinted in from the vault, annihilation

Link to ftv, annihilation:

http://www.wizards.com/magic/magazine/article.aspx?x=mtg/daily/arcana/1426&dcmp=ilc-mtgrss

February 17, 2014 11:02 p.m.

randomguy123 says... #22

Harness the savage power of fifteen of the most brutal Magic cards ever unleashed. These limited-edition, black-bordered superweapons are legal in many tournament formats. Sweep the battlefield clean with this powerful arsenal and blast the opposition into oblivion.

Sounds like storm crow.

February 17, 2014 11:03 p.m.

GoldGhost012 says... #23

If it isn't printed in FTV: Annihilation, I will be very sad. It belongs there.

February 17, 2014 11:47 p.m.

L33TM4ST3R says... #24

It has very nice synergy, but I fell that it is totally helpless against a Tuktuk the Explorer deck.

February 27, 2014 11:24 p.m.

K1LR0Y says... #25

well Storm Crow will deal more commander damage before Tuktuk the Explorer would, and if Storm Crow blocked tuktuk the 5/5 wouldnt deal commander damage so Storm Crow would deal 20 commander damage before the 5/5 could deal 40 normal damage. plus your forgetting its Storm Crow , it will destroy everything in its path, even Tuktuk the Explorer and 40 other 1/1 goblins.

March 1, 2014 9:39 a.m.

Please login to comment