I have tamed lightning brothers

Standard sandcoffin22

SCORE: 8 | 8 COMMENTS | 723 VIEWS


MattOroRain says... #1

Played the deck a few times now, I'm going to say it's pretty strong. Holds amazing against aggro decks and I can see it faring well in game 1 against midrange. Control decks will be an issue still as most of them like Esper and U/W will just be delighted with even if you gimp their life with Skullcrack. Monoblack will hate you though as Underworld Connections makes your job easier. Post board control should be easier, I'm not sure. Nice to see a fringe burn deck that actually interests me. Good job, mate.

February 7, 2014 3:31 p.m.

sandcoffin22 says... #2

thanks

February 7, 2014 3:33 p.m.

sandcoffin22 says... #3

any advice?

February 7, 2014 4:31 p.m.

MattOroRain says... #4

None, sideboard handles the no creature problem I had before. You can finish someone reliably with the burn. But I would find someway to make lasting damage. perhaps a couple mutavaults.

February 7, 2014 7:39 p.m.

sandcoffin22 says... #5

yeah i have a problem with Obzedat, Ghost Council

February 7, 2014 11:03 p.m.

Deadpool213 says... #6

Maybe a add a Stormbreath Dragon or two in the side board instead of Boros Reckoner basically the same idea as the old uw/r decks when they would side in Thundermaw Hellkite

February 8, 2014 12:36 a.m.

sandcoffin22 says... #7

thanks added Stormbreath Dragon

February 8, 2014 12:39 a.m.

ketoryuu says... #8

I think if you would like to run Epic Experiment it would be better to have 4 Divination and 2 Sphinx's Revelation , i know this sound retarded but if you're runing the sphinx's playset and a epic experiment catches it that would be a wasted revelations. But if it catches a divinations you get 2 cards. With this said i think the deck is better without the experiment, and i will suggest Pyromancer's Gauntlet to make that burn finish a bit more viable. I aslo think you should be running 4 Magma Jet for that draw control.

the deck seemes pretty solid congrats.

February 11, 2014 7:22 a.m.

Please login to comment