Introducing Noble: the Format

Noble* graft

SCORE: 239 | 725 COMMENTS | 64576 VIEWS | IN 62 FOLDERS


KorApprentice says... #1

Conphas, there are at least a dozen viable combo's in this format that can win on turn 3 or 4, so a turn 5 win could even be considered slow. UlamogsGyre, the ban list is already up and it is in the description. Cards will only be considered for banning on an individual basis, we will not be copying another format's ban list directly. If we happen to come up with the same banned cards, then at least we will have discussed every option.

April 5, 2012 5:44 p.m.

aloehart199 says... #2

http://tappedout.net/mtg-decks/noble-paladin/my noble deck. Going to make this and another one to take to fnm and hopefully get some people in on it.

April 5, 2012 6:17 p.m.

theonyc says... #3

i don't know about Time WalkMTG Card: Time Walk being banned, using your rare for an extra turn, i think its possible but should be discussed, id rather have a stronger rare

April 5, 2012 6:17 p.m.

parasitian says... #4

how does the sideboard work?

April 5, 2012 6:26 p.m.

KorApprentice says... #5

You cannot have a rare or mythic in your sideboard and any uncommons count towards your 4x limit.

April 5, 2012 7:16 p.m.

graft says... #6

@theonyc: Dark RitualMTG Card: Dark Ritual is not banned. Time WalkMTG Card: Time Walk is banned because a single copy can be abused to lock the other player out of the game with Isochron ScepterMTG Card: Isochron Scepter.

@HeartCruz: 10 uncommons would make many decks way too consistent. One of the goals of this format is to explore the interactions of cards that haven't been considered yet, and I think the 4-uncommon limit helps do that.

@Minousmancer: certain individual land destruction cards certainly could be bannable. Crucible of WorldsMTG Card: Crucible of Worlds as Noble + 4x Strip MineMTG Card: Strip Mine as uncommon is pretty harsh.

@aloehart199: You're exactly right. If two friends want to play a casual game with banned cards, I'm not going to stop them. Post your decks in the comments, I'd love to see them.

@gereffi: Some of the cards you mentioned are overpowered and are ripe for ban. Yawgmoth's WillMTG Card: Yawgmoth's Will is on the ban list. I don't think Force of WillMTG Card: Force of Will, Vedalken ShacklesMTG Card: Vedalken Shackles, or Kira, Great Glass-SpinnerMTG Card: Kira, Great Glass-Spinner are too overpowered but I could be wrong. Goblin GuideMTG Card: Goblin Guide and Ball LightningMTG Card: Ball Lightning are generally fine I think. TarmogoyfMTG Card: Tarmogoyf takes a lot more work when you don't have access to fetchlands and such. Umezawa's JitteMTG Card: Umezawa's Jitte is potentially nuts. Splinter TwinMTG Card: Splinter Twin and Elemental MasteryMTG Card: Elemental Mastery are up for ban consideration and are very likely to go. Kiki-Jiki, Mirror BreakerMTG Card: Kiki-Jiki, Mirror Breaker might be fine unless red ramp breaks him. Presence of GondMTG Card: Presence of Gond is easily broken and highly bannable, same with Intruder AlarmMTG Card: Intruder Alarm. TombstalkerMTG Card: Tombstalker is good but isn't too crazy. Dark ConfidantMTG Card: Dark Confidant is great but dies to a slight breeze.

@ComputersAreDifficult: Battle of WitsMTG Card: Battle of Wits is legal for now, winning on turn 6 seems fine, and it would certainly make for an interesting deck. If someone finds a way to break that card it will be banned, but having 200+ cards makes for a pretty inconsistent deck. Regarding sideboards, your 4 uncommons are shared between the mainboard and sideboard. So if you have 1 Path to ExileMTG Card: Path to Exile in your sideboard you are only allowed 3 other uncommons in your main.

@Conphas: I generally agree with KorApprentice that a turn 5 wins feel about right. It gives both players a chance to set up and enact their strategies. I think that winning on turns 2-3 just makes the opponent feel awful because they didn't get to set up any strategies. Playing against a Yawgmoth's WillMTG Card: Yawgmoth's Will deck just isn't any fun because you just sit there while your opponent essentially plays solitaire. Playing against a Kiki-Jiki, Mirror BreakerMTG Card: Kiki-Jiki, Mirror Breaker deck isn't as bad because if you lose, there was probably something you could have done differently to win.

@UlamogsGyre: definitely post your lists here! As for the EDH ban list, a lot of those cards (like BiorhythmMTG Card: Biorhythm) would be good here, but not necessarily broken. KarakasMTG Card: Karakas, MetalworkerMTG Card: Metalworker, Tolarian AcademyMTG Card: Tolarian Academy are ban targets. The rest are either already banned or should be slow enough to be fine.

April 5, 2012 8:09 p.m.

graft says... #7

If I missed anything bug me again or post on my wall. Thanks for all of the comments and questions! I will update the banned list very soon.

April 5, 2012 8:09 p.m.

Minousmancer says... #8

"Crucible of WorldsMTG Card: Crucible of Worlds as Noble + 4xStrip MineMTG Card: Strip Mine as Uncommon is pretty harsh." - Agreed, that was my first deck idea.

April 5, 2012 8:17 p.m.

graft says... #9

I'll consider Strip MineMTG Card: Strip Mine for a ban. Also, I added Splinter TwinMTG Card: Splinter Twin and Elemental MasteryMTG Card: Elemental Mastery to the banned list.

April 5, 2012 8:40 p.m.

Ohthenoises says... #10

Good... no Izzet decks (as in "is it turn 4 yet?"

April 5, 2012 8:41 p.m.

Minousmancer says... #11

Here we go: deck:crashing-of-worlds

April 5, 2012 8:46 p.m.

aloehart199 says... #12

I just realized that cloudpost isn't banned. yeah definitely building a crazy ass artifact deck now lol. tempered steel on uber crack.

April 5, 2012 9:27 p.m.

aloehart199 says... #13

Mono-black discardhttp://tappedout.net/mtg-decks/discarding-nobility/

I'm really enjoying just building decks in the format, im definitely going to get people into this. one way or another lol. I could easily build "intro" decks to give away with it being such a cheap format

April 5, 2012 9:31 p.m.

Ohthenoises says... #14

I think a neat way to market this to wizards (if you haven't thought about that yet you should) would be something like the From the Vault Legends and make a deck for each creature in that set to give them an idea of how it could be packaged. If you understand what I'm saying at all lol.

April 5, 2012 10:10 p.m.

Minousmancer says... #15

Ohthenoises, that is ingenues.

April 5, 2012 10:21 p.m.

Minousmancer says... #16

We could split the task up of doing that between Minousmancer, Crivaro, Ohthenoises, KorApprentice, & graft: Then we could all help each other Play-test the decks find weaknesses and find solutions and we would all come out with topnotch decks to present to WotC/Hasbro.

April 5, 2012 10:27 p.m.

Minousmancer says... #17

My newest Pauper abomination: deck:pauper-chastic-flow

April 5, 2012 10:55 p.m.

aloehart199 says... #18

Another deck Mass of nobility

Deck built around chimeric mass and artifacts, taking advantage of cloudpost for huge ramp.

April 5, 2012 10:57 p.m.

mafteechr says... #19

Here is my deck: Nobletog

April 5, 2012 11:09 p.m.

parasitian says... #20

+1 for the deck, also on sideboarding, say I have 4 uncommons in the deck, cood I have 4 uncommons in sideboard but have to trade them in for other uncommons if I wanted to mainboard them? OR wood that be considered 8 uncommons and therefore be non-legal?

April 5, 2012 11:34 p.m.

parasitian says... #21

and deck:tempered-steel-noble

April 5, 2012 11:42 p.m.

Ohthenoises says... #22

4 uncommons may be split between your deck and sideboard as you see fit but the deck including the sideboard may only include 4 uncommons total.

April 6, 2012 12:50 a.m.

PvtCaboose434 says... #23

Here's my go at this format.

Noble's Poison

April 6, 2012 7:37 a.m.

Bingbing says... #24

Interestingly, TinkerMTG Card: Tinker is uncommon, but I cannot for the life of me think of any broken artifacts that it can search for.

April 6, 2012 9:35 a.m.

vishnarg says... #25

You have to ban Stoneforge MysticMTG Card: Stoneforge Mystic- if this deck used Stoneforge, it would be broken.

April 6, 2012 10:14 a.m.

Please login to comment