Question. Do the Masters Editions for MTGO count for rarity? Because some cards have been lowered in those sets, but they were never technically 'printed'.
April 8, 2012 9:40 a.m.
No, they don't. The card rarity counts as the lowest it was ever printed in a regular block set, excluding promos and premium deck series or any of that. Just what it was in regular sets.
April 8, 2012 12:35 p.m.
ComputersAreDifficult says... #4
Since everyone else seems to like posting their decks here...
deck:overbeing-of-nobility
deck:regen-irritate-noble
April 8, 2012 1:38 p.m.
Ohthenoises says... #5
@ComputersAreDifficult graft told everyone to do so lol that's why.
April 8, 2012 1:40 p.m.
Was the other idea I had. For the format, especially with the new spoilers it seems Miracle could be veryyyyy broken here because of topdecking and cards like Brainstorm, Halimar Depths and Ponder. The second thing is that since ramp is fairly easy in this format with Rampant Growth, Llanowar Elves and Viridian Emissary, Dawntreader Elk, Sakura-Tribe Elder and so forth that cards like the new un-killable angel would be incredibly difficult if at all defeatable because she could not be killed unless someone nobles their DoJ or BSZ
April 8, 2012 2:36 p.m.
Minousmancer says... #7
All of mine:
deck:badpauper - Bad Moon - I survive.
deck:pauper-chastic-flow - Eon Hub - awesome combo.
deck:for-die-you-will - Balefire Dragon - Weee Balefire.
deck:worth-any-sacrifice - Visara the Dreadful - Legendary challenge.
deck:dread-nought-my-fiends - Phyrexian Dreadnought - This one has been a lot of fun.
April 8, 2012 2:43 p.m.
This is a really cool idea for a format. Here's my crack at a noble deck:
April 8, 2012 3:19 p.m.
Also TappedOut should add the Noble deck category to the deck builder so we can designate our decks as Noble.
April 8, 2012 4:11 p.m.
i kinda like noble. my problem with competitive edh is that you had to have collected powerful cards over the years to make a good deck, and im a newer player (played kamigawa block then didnt play again till mirrodin besieged). my problem with casual edh is that 100-card decks are annoying to shuffle.
April 8, 2012 4:16 p.m.
Minousmancer says... #11
keshav, many of us would ditto your comment numbered 209!
April 8, 2012 4:30 p.m.
Minousmancer says... #12
Also I think it would be helpful when making your deck if you set the "Format" to Pauper, well unless we can get Noble as an option but until then.
April 8, 2012 4:42 p.m.
Actually Minousmancer, I clearly did say in comment 192 here that we should get Noble as an official deck type. I'm already on that. I asked yeaGO! to do so.
April 8, 2012 8:11 p.m.
Minousmancer says... #14
I read your original comment, that doesn't mean it will come to fruition though, hence the wording of my comment.
April 8, 2012 8:15 p.m.
Love this format. Built a deck for it, will probably be building more. Noble Mondronen Shaman
April 8, 2012 10:09 p.m.
KorApprentice says... #16
I have another Ban Target here, Phyrexian Dreadnought is too broken with phasing. Noble Visions of Dread
April 8, 2012 10:52 p.m.
Arachnarchist says... #18
Potential ban target: Pyromancer Ascension
Made the following deck deck:noble-pyromancer.
Consistently wins on turn 3, occasionally turn 2.
April 9, 2012 1:17 a.m.
Hey Guys loving the format me and my friends are all making decks to play with soon.
Here's my first take, let me know what you think :)
April 9, 2012 6:46 a.m.
I've looked up and down this thread for the answer to this question but I can't find it. Does the noble card have to be a creature or can it be a sorcery, artifact, planeswalker, etc.
April 9, 2012 11:30 a.m.
I've looked up and down this thread for the answer to this question but I can't find it. Does the noble card have to be a creature or can it be a sorcery, artifact, planeswalker, etc.
April 9, 2012 11:30 a.m.
KorApprentice says... #22
Are you kidding elifosl? That question has been answered several times. This is the text in the rules description above:
One rare or mythic rare card. This is your Noble card. The Noble card must be rare or mythic rare.
It does not say that it must be a creature. Also, two posts above you someone is using Pyromancer Ascension as their Noble, which is not a creature.
April 9, 2012 11:36 a.m.
Arachnarchist says... #24
Just a thought:
Perhaps the starting hand size should be six. Allowing the rare to be a functional seventh card. Thus imitating a scenario where you would always have that rare in your opening hand. I also feel like this would also slow down some combo decks. I know it would hurt my Pyromancer Ascension deck a little.
vishnarg says... #1
Heres the Omnath deck: Noble: Omnath. Also, congrats on 200+ comments and 5000+ views! Noble forever!
April 8, 2012 8:27 a.m.