Definitely like the build. A couple thoughts...I'd be inclined to replace your 4 card:Avacyn's Pilgrim with 4 Farseek 's. Add 1 more Resto Angel and drop 1 Domri Rade. Drop 1 Bonfire and add 1 card:Aurelia's Fury (gives you another win condition depending upon what you have in play).

Might see if there's a way to fit a couple Rancor 's in there. You have plenty of beefy creatures but they become a 'must deal with it now' if you throw trample into the mix.

+1...giggity.

the reason i dropped the Farseek for the Arbor Elf is because if i +1 Domri Rade into a Farseek i don't get to keep it, where as if i +1 into a card:Avacyn's Pilgrim i do get to keep it, giving me card advantage and getting to maybe a Bonfire of the Damned or 2 beefy creatures next turn. the reason i want to stay away from other spells that aren't creatures is because i want to get value out of Domri Rade i do like the card:Aurelia's Fury and i will see how it play test, not sure if i want to drop a Bonfire of the Damned for it though.

While I understand the logic on the Farseek decision, I'd call out that +1 card advantage is a wash. You get the same +1 for a Farseek that you would if you drew it for Domri Rade 's +1. I would argue that the benefit is greater to use Farseek since you get an actual land out of the deal versus getting a 1/1 creature that will produce a mana next turn (assuming it lives that long). And...if you Domri a Farseek, you don't lose the Farseek...you can just count on drawing it the next turn. Anyhow, just figured I'd offer the counter argument as it's clear you're putting logic to good use.

yeah thanks man, i do aprreciate it but i think i would rather get that extra card since it comes into play tapped anyway

Looks great! I'd say if you do decide to add something else, Boros Charms could be what get trimmed.

And yes, Rancor would be great.

maybe i will put Rancor s instead of Boros Charm s, thanks

I'm going to play test it like that and see if its better or worse, you just get so much value out of Boros Charm but then thinking about it i know if my guy dies ill get my Rancor back... decisions decisions

4x Rancor & sideboard 4x Boros Charm . 2x Bonfire of the Damned & 2x card:Aurelia's Fury is the better option. Bonfire is a miracle & u don't need Fury unti they've played their aggro or their win cons. 4x Domri Rade since u want to turn 3 him. U can cut 2 lands since your avg cvc (average converted mana cost) is only 2.75 & u have 8x mana dorks with Arbor Elf & card:Avacyn's Pilgrim. It works better with Domri if u do. Then cut a Thragtusk & a Huntmaster of the Fells  ^Flip to add 1 more Restoration Angel since he is the reason your'e running so many high cost enters the battlefield ability creatures in the 1st place. That will lower your avg cvc a bit more also. Which leaves you at 60 cards & 26 creatures for Domri. =P Hope I've helped u some!

Great looking list! I would love to suggest a card, but I think you got it covered! I would love to see one more card:Aurelia's Fury in here, but that's just my preference.

Good job on the list, I really like the sideboard btw.

+1

Thanks man!!! I appreciate it, I wish I could but I really feel like the deck should have 32 creatures am 6 other spells. I just couldn't get it there

Clan Defiance ?

what would you suggest swapping

Other than some occasional explosive nut draws, Burning-Tree Emissary seems a bit lackluster. Naya has access to arguably the best pool of creatures in standard right now and a free vanilla 2/2 is pretty unexciting compared to 4-ofs for your Restoration Angel or Loxodon Smiter , or Boros Reckoner who has quickly started to redefine the meta.

i disagree to some extent, hes not a free creatur, he plays well with domri, and wolfrun and a hardcast bonfire as well, its not as much the free creature its the ability for me to throw my guy at your guy on turn 2

I might look to include some Lightning Mauler . Maybe -1 Thragtusk -1 Arbor Elf 1- card:Avacyn's Pilgrim for +3 Lightning Mauler . If you throw down that Burning-Tree Emissary turn two then soulbound with the mauler, you swing for 4 on turn two. Pretty sweet.

That's not this deck, that's a different deck, that's the human build of this deck, it's more aggro this is more of a mid range deck

Fair enough. Nice deck, btw.

Thanks man, give a +1

Oh lumberjack!

Does Boros Reckoner mean anything to you?

idk yet, obviously its a card, and i have played against it but ive just delt with it withe the -2 prey upon on domri im sure it could fit in here in place of the loxodon smiter but i would have to redo my mana

and huntmaster of the fells reminds me so much of the lumberjack that i altered my huntmaster fetch cards to have will ferrell on them lol

Take out Burning Tree for Boros Reckoner, he is awesome lol... very similar to my deck Naya Midrange 0-0