pie chart

Jund but I'm too poor to play fair, AKA 12goyf

Modern Aggro BRG (Jund) Budget Midrange

Kazekazu


Sideboard


Maybeboard


Though Tappedout says ~$900, I still think the deck is budget if you cut down the manabase and sideboard. See budgeting section for justification and budget substitutes to make the deck even cheaper.

This deck's goal is to pump out as many goyf-type of cards as fast as possible, supported by a combination of burn and proactive discard. You want to be more fast than conventional GBx, putting on a clock earlier, like an extreme version of Jund or Abzan traverse decks. This deck is not focused on attrition with cards like Dark Confidant , Liliana of the Veil , or Tireless Tracker , which generate steady card advantage or pseudo card advantage. You really do not want to be taking things slowly.

This means it can play defensively against decks that would play a bunch of smaller creatures with larger creatures and efficient removal while also being able to play more aggressively against slower decks by disrupting their hand and quickly threatening lethal damage.

Additionally, card selection through Burning Inquiry , Grim Flayer , Faithless Looting , Traverse the Ulvenwald , and Bedlam Reveler help to dig for sideboard hate or anti-hate while streamlining draw consistency.

Deck is still very much in the works. Death's Shadow , Vexing Devil and card:Claim/Fame are things to look at

The deck is budget in the sense that most of the maindeck is relatively cheap for modern; basically all the costs are concentrated around the manabase, which can be tuned for personal budget

As with all decks, sideboard should be customized based on the meta you are up against, rather than copy+pasted from anywhere.

It might not be the cheapest budget deck, but at least it's midrange-esque in playstyle. The deck consists almost entirely of staples that can slot into other meta decks: RB Hollow One, Abzan Traverse, or Mardu Pyromancer, mostly

Goyf? Show

No 6th 1 CMC discard? Show

20 one drops Show

20 lands Show

Why Risk Factor ? Show

Too Graveyard Dependent? Show

Compared to GBx, you trade consistent attrition for more explosive pressure. The deck trades out slower value cards like Bloodbraid Elf , Siege Rhino , Liliana of the Veil and Dark Confidant for basically more goyfs that generate a bit of value. The focus of the goodstuff cards is their proactive pressure, rather than utility and board control. I think the deck is closer to a RB Hollow One midrange splashing green than GBx or Mardu Pyromancer.

This is true in regards to removal spells as well. Rather than waiting for the opponent to play things to destroy a la Fatal Push and AssTrophy, the removal spells in the deck all have the option to be used proactively for pressure or discarded to fill the graveyard if they aren't useful at a particular moment in time.

Compared to RB Hollow One, the deck should be less explosive but more consistent, so games aren't as boom and bust as Hollow One.

The deck is really graveyard dependent, probably as much as Dredge or RB Hollow One. The deck shouldn't auto-fold to graveyard hate, however. Ideally, you should be able to filter for counter-graveyard hate with Lootings, Burning Inquiries, and Flayers. I would like to reduce how dependent the deck is on the graveyard; maybe Flamewake Phoenix , Risk Factor and Traverse the Ulvenwald could be replaced?

All the deck's removal is burn, which means you lose out on the ability to deal with larger creatures and non-creature permanents game 1 like GBx.

The deck also lacks the lategame power or topdeck capabilities of GBx. This is substituted by the ability of this deck to be more aggressive (but less so than Hollow One) and to filter out some of the worser draws with Flashback Lootings/Risk Factors and Grim Flayer. Still, come "lategame", a Siege Rhino or Bloodbraid Elf are better topdecks than 5 mana topdecked Hollow One .

Lastly, the deck is tri-colored, which means you lose out on the utility lands of GBx and have a more painful manabase.

I always wanted to play GBx midrange, but it was always out of budget. The deck is a lot more affordable in 2018 than it was in the past, but, still, it's one of the most expensive decks in the format. I wanted to play the deck on a budget. The problem is, GBx is a goodstuff deck; if you can't afford the goodstuff, you can't play the deck. The options were to change gameplans (like this deck) or to create a really janky imitation of GBx that would probably be worse than even streamlined budget decks.

I wanted to play fair magic, rather than depending on the broken synergies and interactions Modern is known for, but many of the key "floodgates" that forced you to play fair magic in GBx (Liliana, Goyf, and Dark Confidant), were too pricey.

I tried to make a fair budget GBx deck, but couldn't do it. The cards were either individually too weak or relied on synergies that couldn't consistently be drawn or setup.

So, I went full degenerate and gave up on a control playstyle and focusing on being a very aggressive midrange deck. And that's how this jank pile came to be.

Games are best 2 out of 3 on Untap.in

Game 1, Play Show

Game 2, Play Show

Game 3, Draw Show

Suggestions

Updates Add

Comments

Date added 5 years
Last updated 5 years
Exclude colors WU
Splash colors G
Legality

This deck is Modern legal.

Rarity (main - side)

4 - 0 Mythic Rares

32 - 8 Rares

10 - 5 Uncommons

9 - 2 Commons

Cards 60
Avg. CMC 2.70
Tokens Frog Lizard 3/3 G
Votes
Ignored suggestions
Shared with
Views