bumatlarge says... #2
Very nice, but I think adding in a couple Rites of Flourishing will double this decks effectiveness.
September 21, 2011 5:18 a.m.
Excellent idea. They can replace the Selective Memory 2-of after standard rotates.
September 21, 2011 5:23 a.m.
bumatlarge says... #5
I think you might be jealous of the deep strategy present here. Sometimes I think most of the top decks seem similar to this one in actual viability. Or perhaps I'm just jealous no one gives me +1s :(
September 21, 2011 9:14 a.m.
broodwarjc says... #6
This is a good reason why I am giving up using this site to get good feedback on my deck ideas. No one posts on anything but Cawblade variants and Pod decks now a days. The decks are always almost exactly the same and use the same strategy and that is all the members of this site encourage. So yes I will feed the troll because getting any kind of constructive criticism on this site means putting up the exact same kind of deck that 20 people before you just put up.
September 21, 2011 9:17 a.m.
bumatlarge is going in the right direction with Rites of Flourishing . This deck definitely needs green. I'll post how I do with it at FNM this week and everything.
September 21, 2011 11:28 a.m.
How about some Memnite and Ornithopter s?They will prevent yourself missing mana while you add cheap creatures.
September 21, 2011 2:06 p.m.
masterpeez says... #10
Thanks guys for the great suggestions. There are just so many good ideas here.
I'll definetely be making an extended version with that genius [laboratory maniac]]+Treasure Hunt combo sometime soon.
broodwarjc, you seem to have some strong feelings about the way things are here on tappedout. You should get an article posted about whats wrong tappedout.net culture these days, as you see it.
September 21, 2011 2:24 p.m.
I'm sure that whichever direction you decide to take the deck it will be brilliant. You're named masterpeez for a reason.
September 21, 2011 2:34 p.m.
use laboratory maniac to win XD i have the same idea but U/b wth 38 relentless rats and 1 pounder
September 21, 2011 7:09 p.m.
Any way to make that deck cheaper? 98 cents is a bit over my budget :(
September 25, 2011 1:28 a.m.
mozerdozer says... #19
At least this deck wins more than his Haze Frog decks.
September 25, 2011 8:47 a.m.
mozerdozer says... #21
It's this. He acts like the deck is good when it clearly can't win. I'm not sure why everyone went along with it.
September 25, 2011 2:47 p.m.
Ya that's the only problem i have with this site(It is the best site i have found though). People put up decks that are stupid or say stuff that's stupid and then people go and agree with it. This isn't a joke site. Decks that are put up should be real decks not just some crap deck that you think is funny.
September 25, 2011 2:52 p.m.
spartanwolfej says... #23
I just want to say that I came to this site for the constructive criticism and the unique deck ideas I've seen, and that's why I keep coming back. I realize that not everybody appreciates the occasional troll deck, but I for one enjoy the humor behind it. It's not like these decks are overcrowding the site; in fact, this is the first troll deck I've actually seen on here, besides yeago's earthquake deck, and I didn't see anybody making a big deal out of that.
September 25, 2011 3:09 p.m.
Must.... NOT.... FEED.... TROLL
Aaah, hell with it, here goes; another of my rare, but fun (and right) rants:
Seriously dude, why? Do you get a kick out of annoying members with your silly comments, decks, and general attitude on this site? I wouldn't have even found this deck, had it not been on the 'top rated' deck section - and that's what irks me. I was ready to leave you to your silly behaviour, and was almost ready to do a bit of a U-turn when I saw that a deck on the top deck section was by yourself - then, I was let down by the fact that this is a piss-take. :(
I'm gonna stop now actually, before I fill the page up.
torridus says... #1
I'll chip in for DR there.
Add Walking Atlas so you can put lands into play while you put lands into play.
September 21, 2011 4:43 a.m.