Mana Flood

Modern masterpeez

SCORE: 50 | 78 COMMENTS | 9323 VIEWS


gheridarigaaz says... #1

creature lands... Creeping Tar Pit , Celestial Colonnade etc

September 26, 2011 5:59 a.m.

BLMC says... #2

I think someone should take every card that commenters have jokingly told you to add, and make a deck. creeping tar pit, trench gorger, ornithoper, rites of flourishing, etc. I will +1 that deck just like i did this one.

And to all the haters, MTG is a game, have fun. This thread is funy, you are supposed to laugh when things are funny. like this: "hahaha". Life is more fun that way. I promise!

September 26, 2011 6:28 a.m.

weterr123 says... #3

It should be done on a thread in the forum as a deck idea, not an actual deck that can receive votes and reach 'top deck' status for being silly.

September 26, 2011 6:36 a.m.

SidewinderI says... #4

hmmm... how about New Frontiers . This deck must be greeeeeeen. And to all the people getting all upset, I see where your coming from but just calm down, geez, there are enough serious decks on this site to make up for the occasional silly one.

September 26, 2011 10:52 a.m.

mrjames141 says... #5

OH MY GOD. YOUR SO FREAKEN AWSOME. How do you come up with such a awsome deck.

September 26, 2011 12:30 p.m.

Delicious says... #6

Dude, this deck has one fatal flaw. It lacks Rocket Launcher

add a few of those and you'll be golden -

September 27, 2011 1:30 a.m.

dofborg says... #7

If this deck is to make top tier in legacy, it needs chimney imp

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEVSahgCegk

I understand you'll have to splash black for it, but how can you say no to that 26-turn timer?

September 27, 2011 4:16 a.m.

orangeGoblinXP says... #8

would hate to play against this deck seriously it worries me knowing that these kinds of decks are even legal. +1 for managing to solve the rotation headache for this list must of been tricky.might i suggest a splash of red so you can use the Invader Parasite to full potential

September 27, 2011 3:46 p.m.

timgenn says... #9

Grow up you immature troll

September 27, 2011 5:21 p.m.

_poke_me says... #10

Har har har har! Oh some comments are truly brilliant! GJ man! Never miss a drop! +1

September 28, 2011 5:27 a.m.

_poke_me says... #11

Now for suggestions, how about card:Fa'adiyah Seer or Frontier Guide or Greenseeker or Hermit Druid or Joiner Adept or even Sasaya, Orochi Ascendant ? And yeah, this deck definitely needs green!

September 28, 2011 5:34 a.m.

pacundo says... #12

lmao!!make all islands foil.also, you could splash red, to include the best red creature, Goatnapper !!

September 28, 2011 7:46 a.m.

burntsnow says... #13

u/b 1xzombie infestation 1xlab manic treasure hunt mulligan till you get a treasure hunt=win!!!!!!

September 29, 2011 7:31 a.m.

RDorothy says... #14

a stupid deck like this gets 63 comments. the deckcycle feature on this site is broken as hell.

September 29, 2011 4:02 p.m.

flashpower says... #15

ummm, moderators??? existent?

September 29, 2011 11:40 p.m.

Jain_Mor says... #16

After the 28th turn, this deck usually has more mana than any other.

Thats what wins games.

September 30, 2011 10:46 a.m.

scholar says... #17

Where's the -1 button?

October 1, 2011 11:58 a.m.

this needs less cards and more islands.Ever tried doing -2 Selective Memory?It might run a bit smoother.

October 1, 2011 10:44 p.m.

n00dn1nj4d00d says... #19

I would have probably gone green mana flood myself. 2x Oath of Druids 58 Forest

October 3, 2011 12:27 a.m.

n00dn1nj4d00d says... #20

but I imagine your trying to stay standard format I missed that >_>

October 3, 2011 12:28 a.m.

MTGbowling says... #21

this is terrible, check out my deck for the real plays.best deck.

October 3, 2011 10:13 a.m.

Dornith says... #22

I find this very frustrating.

No, this isn't funny and it takes up a slot on the top deck list that should be given to someone else.

October 3, 2011 10:36 p.m.

MTGbowling says... #23

lol why u mad tho?

October 4, 2011 2:02 a.m.

mpgraci says... #25

I would have gone red myself. More consistent.

October 4, 2011 1:22 p.m.

Please login to comment