Metamorphic1992 says... #2
And if u have bloodsoaked champion or alesha u can keep bringing it back. Too bad its a 4 card combo.
February 10, 2015 9:04 p.m.
bananasamarai says... #3
Indeed. I plan to make a deck around purphoros, Butcher of the Horde, Bloodsoaked Champion, Flamewake Phoenix, Ashcloud Phoenix, and lots of dash as well as token drop. Should be pretty sick when it's finished.
February 10, 2015 9:46 p.m.
I would place at least more Mardu Ascendancy but i like your deck, +1
February 13, 2015 3:09 p.m.
ProxyTester says... #6
You know this is really strange because I have a deck very simaler to this one exept it runs 3 Crackling Doom and 2 Hero's Downfall and 3 Banishing Light
February 14, 2015 1:15 a.m.
nathan0627 says... #7
try maining 4 Harsh Sustenance over lightning strike and 1 more ascendancy
February 16, 2015 11:22 p.m.
doriboncore says... #8
Honestly, I find that Harsh Sustenance doesn't perform well in the early turns of a game which is why I'm currently only running 1 in the sideboard. Its a great late game burn spell but its not so great turn 2 or 3.
February 16, 2015 11:27 p.m.
HolyFalcon says... #9
I would trade that foil bloodstained mire for some pain lands and more mires.
February 16, 2015 11:46 p.m.
doriboncore says... #10
I should trade that foil Bloodstained Mire for some Caves of Koilos and Battlefield Forges, but its so hard to part with. I think its the most valuable card I own, lol.
February 17, 2015 12:37 a.m.
bnrusbeshnui says... #11
Try to minimaze the deck, Keep the best cards as 3 and 4 offs, but get ridd from most of the deck. If you will stick only to the best, the deck will become better because of the statastic who says you will draw only the best.
February 20, 2015 3:14 a.m.
Metamorphic1992 says... #12
@bnrusbeshnui Youre right in the sense that this is an aggro deck therefore 3x and 4x give u better odds statistically of drawing the best cards totaling the most production. There is a bit more to it tho. Its okay to run 2x or the occasional 1x of something if it fulfills a similar or the same purpose as other cards in the deck that u want to see more often but not enough to run 3 or 4 more. It all depends on how often u want to draw a certain card or a certain similar type of card. But rather than splitting them 50/50 or as close as possible u simple 4x the better card and run 1 or 2 of the slightly lesser but still adequate card performing the same function in the deck to get the odds u want of drawing that similar type of card. Control decks also run less copies of individual cards b.c they run a variety of cards to handle all different types of situations and can afford to run less of certain cards that they need late game b.c they plan to stick around awhile and will eventually get them. But that doesnt apply in this case. His/ her best bet would be to run the most consistent deck build possible which largely banks on having 3 or 4 of the best cards available but its okay to run even more say 6 or 8 of a card in the technical sense if u have another card that accomplishes basically the same thing to make up the extra 2-4 copies necessary for consistency in that area. Its not as complex as i make it sound i apologize if theres any confusion.
February 20, 2015 7:07 a.m.
Nice deck, but here is a very cheap warriors deck
Mardu Warriors Playtest
Standard*
SCORE: 0 | 0 COMMENTS | 27 VIEWSFebruary 20, 2015 9:36 a.m.
Metamorphic1992 says... #14
It just sucks b.c u never discover your full potential with a budgeted deck. There r cheap 1 or 2 ofs in here that u can buy as singles easily which doesn't make sense plus u can use ur winnings to complete the deck if its really doing so well. That said, i used to build standard red deck wins decks b.c the budget was always low but its worked out fine for me, while i acquired as many expensive cards for other decks as i could. In the mean time it was go red!
February 20, 2015 6:20 p.m.
I like what you did with this deck. I think the ankle shanker is out of place though.
February 20, 2015 10:22 p.m.
Alex.moellmer says... #16
Have you considered Obelisk of Urd with console easy turn 3/4 play and gives a huge buff to your creatures or Spear of Heliod which can act as a white permanent for your Battle Brawler I have a similar tribal deck without the red My deck:
Black white warriors REFORGED Playtest
Standard
SCORE: 6 | 9 COMMENTS | 606 VIEWSFebruary 28, 2015 2:09 a.m.
doriboncore says... #18
I have thought about Obelisk of Urd, but even if I convoke to cast it, the fastest I can get it out is turn 3. Most often, it would come out on turn 4. Either way, I'm completely tapped out and didn't put any pressure on my opponent the turn I play it. And I find its usually better to play Brutal Hordechief or dash in a Mardu Strike Leader on turn 4. Therefore, I'm not running Obelisk of Urd.
March 2, 2015 10:53 a.m.
fallenarchetype says... #19
It's interesting how many one and two ofs you have in the deck. I'm a little worried about consistency. How has it been working for you?
+1'd because the idea is great and it looks like it could be really obnoxious to play against.
March 3, 2015 4:41 a.m.
doriboncore says... #20
fallenarchetype. Consistency hasn't been a big issue due to synergy of most of the cards.
March 3, 2015 11:12 a.m.
JoeyTheMindSculpter says... #21
i dont mind a lot of 2 of's but a ton of 1 of's is a mess. consistancy is pretty key to a aggro deck
March 4, 2015 6:29 p.m.
HolyFalcon says... #22
Just to point out, you run FORTY-ONE different cards in this deck. Might wanna make some playsets and 3-ofs happen...
Also, why no Aven Skirmisher? He receives benefits from the Chiefs, and is a flyer.
March 4, 2015 6:41 p.m.
HolyFalcon says... #23
Also, I suggest making another deck with cards you don't own just so you have an end in mind to what you're trying to achieve.
March 4, 2015 6:42 p.m.
Metamorphic1992 says... #24
The lack of consistency causes the deck to under perform even if it has not been detrimental to your success personally that doesn't mean the deck wouldnt perform on a higher level if u eliminated 1 ofs. You want to see the best cards as often as possible, 1 copy is very take it or leave it, having a few things up ur sleeve is what the sb is for not the mainboard. Just for the record if your deck is winning with several 1 ofs bogging it down then maybe u should evaluate your level of competition. As a guide for aggro, 4 of= want to see as early or as often as possible, 3 of= At least once a game most games, but twice is acceptable, 2 of= Only long games only once a game ever, or is very situational, 1 of= only when i tutor for it but once is acceptable. These numbers are also subject to being determined by its purpose in the deck, for example, using a sub when u need more than 4 of a card, u add a couple of a similar card but that doesnt always mean u want to see it only so often it just works in tandom with another card that is slightly better abd thus is a 4 of. Does any of this make sense?
March 4, 2015 6:50 p.m.
HolyFalcon says... #25
Metamorphic1992 you took the words right out of my mouth.
New cards: Radiant Purge and Aven Sunstriker are the only two I feel like are really good in this, unless you wanna go Mardu Aggro, not Warrior Tribal.
bananasamarai says... #1
If you wanted to be the coolest dude around, combo Tymaret, the Murder King Athreos, God of Passage and Purphoros, God of the Forge This gets nasty real quick. Sacrifice a creature and deal 2, then either return to your hand with Athreos and play again to deal 2 to each opponent with Purphoros or deal 3 damage to the opponent.
February 10, 2015 8:39 p.m.