doriboncore says... #2
Since a lot of people, seem to think the deck was inconsistent due to the number of "1 of"s and "2 of"s that the deck ran, I changed up the main and sideboard some. I am aware the deck is still running only 1 of Brutal Hordechief, Tymaret, the Murder King and Crackling Doom due to card availability. The deck only runs 1 copy of Zurgo Helmsmasher on purpose, due to it being a 5 drop. The one copy Bloodsoaked Champion and the two copies of Mardu Woe-Reaper serve the same purpose in the deck.
March 5, 2015 11:02 a.m.
JoeyTheMindSculpter says... #3
take out the junk and replace it with better things. like ridedown doesnt really play a big role, use rush of battle isntaid. also spear of heliod of oblisk of urd is something you should put in.
March 5, 2015 6:04 p.m.
Adam_Kaiser1 says... #4
You need to fix a lot with this deck, I'm sorry to say. I don't like to judge but since you asked me for advice; I'm going to give you my honest opinion...
-3 Battle Brawler-3 Chief of the Scale
Both of these cards are decent, but not in an aggro deck. You are using Edge which is actually helpful in an aggro deck, but boosting toughness by one isn't that helpful when they can Lightning Strike your creatures..
I don't know what else needs to be taked out of the deck, but I would add at least:
+1 Mardu Ascendency
+2 Crackling Doom
+3 War-Name Asprint
Asprint and Doom can help you get rid of obstacles in your way and get pass those pecky 0 powered blockers to deal 3 damage each turn she is left unanswered...
This is just food for though...
March 5, 2015 6:06 p.m.
JoeyTheMindSculpter says... #5
i disagree with taking out cheif of the edges, it gives you a better grip on staying in the game to dodge drown is sorrows and sometimes lightning strikes. war named asprint is just to much of a hassle. suggest that you take out shadow spears and 2 stike leaders for more copies of brutal hoard chiefs and add in more kill spells and seeker of the way
March 5, 2015 6:10 p.m.
JoeyTheMindSculpter says... #6
Btw dont have you cards foiled. it confuses people
March 5, 2015 6:11 p.m.
Adam_Kaiser1 says... #7
You need more one drops and Mardu Charms..
Bloodsoaked Champions, Mardu Woe-Reaper are better than Shadowspear and Strike Leaders because Woe exiles cards from opponents graves and Bloodsoaked comes back from the grave..
Mardu Decks are known to be fast and kill by at least turn 5. Mardu was not meant to be midrange. Your only choice is Aggro or Control..
If you look at my budget build, Budget Mardu Rush Aggro, you see that I don't do much in the fancy department. However, I do use a lot of balancing my spells and creatures with cards that can keep my tempo high
March 5, 2015 6:15 p.m.
SiegeRhiNOOO says... #8
Adam_Kaiser1 I have literally no idea why you're saying that Battle Brawler it's not suited for this warriors deck. It's a 4/2 first striker when you have a Chief of the Edge in play, and IMO, that's good. I agree about your Chief of the Scale opinion though.
March 5, 2015 6:17 p.m.
Adam_Kaiser1 says... #9
I said Scale, not Edge. Scale is somewhat useful, but not very in a deck with lower toughness creatures...
March 5, 2015 6:17 p.m.
Adam_Kaiser1 says... #10
Dies to Bile Blight, Lightning Strike, etc. etc. etc.
There is always a way around first strikers.. He simply dies to removal...
March 5, 2015 6:19 p.m.
SiegeRhiNOOO says... #11
Just because he's using Mardu doesn't mean he's obligated to go Aggro Adam_Kaiser1, explain how Mardu Planeswalkers or Mardu control then. It isn't Aggro, yet it works really good.
March 5, 2015 6:20 p.m.
SiegeRhiNOOO says... #12
Adam_Kaiser1 you're stating a really bad reason here dude. EVEN Zurgo does to removal and bile blight and EVEN the War-Name Aspirant you suggested DIES TO REMOVAL. No offense but please, almost every creature dies to removal.
March 5, 2015 6:23 p.m.
Adam_Kaiser1 says... #13
I said Mardu Control was an option, but Most Mardu Decks (other than those) are Aggro. I'm not trying to start a war over this; he asked me for my opinion and I gave it...
March 5, 2015 6:24 p.m.
Adam_Kaiser1 says... #14
At least War Name can hit through a wall of Mystics and Caryatids, and in the late game; Not be blocked by small creatures is a very good thing...
March 5, 2015 6:27 p.m.
Adam_Kaiser1 says... #15
And the Mardu have answers to removal:
Mardu Charm
Sac an Ascendency
I think there are more, but I'm too tired to look around...
March 5, 2015 6:31 p.m.
SiegeRhiNOOO says... #16
Why would they block your creatures with power three or greater with a Caryatid? They need it for early ramp. -_-"
March 5, 2015 6:37 p.m.
Adam_Kaiser1 says... #18
Read War-Name's Effect under the Raid Effect.. That's all I'll say.. Anyway, if you want to see a Mardu Aggro Budget Build, look at the link I've left.. I still think it needs work, but don't suggest Brawler.. I had him to begin with but War Name was a little better.. I'm debating on Ankle Shanker vs Zurgo Helmsmasher...
March 5, 2015 6:43 p.m.
davidthesaxplayer says... #20
It may be a little out if place in a warrior deck but Iroas, God of Victory can be a very nice addition even if it is only used as an enchantment instead of a creature. Just a suggestion. If anyone wants to help with mine check out my page.
March 6, 2015 7:35 a.m.
Alex.moellmer says... #21
Has anyone seen the new mythic spoiler cards, two new warriors that look amazing haha , blood chin fanatic and arashin foremost I do belive
March 6, 2015 7:33 p.m.
Nice deck, +1.
I have a very similar deck to this, The Glory Of The Strike but decided to splash some modern cards in there to add a card draw element since the low cmc of the creatures meant I was top decking too soon.
I'd also suggest Font of Return, its great at bringing back the low cost Chief's towards the end of the game to boost some of the heavy hitters.
March 7, 2015 12:04 p.m.
JoeyTheMindSculpter says... #23
Blood chin fanatic and arashin formost will be very good in a B/W warrior as 4 of but 2 of in mardue warrior because of double whit and black. their defenitly going in my b/w warrior deck
March 10, 2015 6:08 p.m.
Koalamaster123 says... #24
Maybe figure out what your deck really needs, then run full play sets of those cards?
March 14, 2015 10:31 a.m.
FrostyJams says... #25
This deck seemed to be all over the place at first look, but it really shines in the playtest. Somehow this kitchen sink always performs. Nice job, +1 I don't have much to offer for feedback cause you already have one of everything, LOL. I would appreciate your comments on my Warrior deck It Takes a Soldier to Lead Unblockable Warriors when you get a chance.
SiegeRhiNOOO says... #1
I don't know anything about your financial status, but how about a playset of Bloodsoaked Champion? I think your deck needs more consistency. And maybe at least one or two Raiders' Spoils for buffing your warriors and getting card draws?
Check out my Abzan Warriors deck, maybe you could see something there that would help you.
Abzan Siege-Warriors! (UPDATED) Playtest
Standard SiegeRhiNOOO
SCORE: 8 | 10 COMMENTS | 995 VIEWS+1 from me. Thanks!
March 4, 2015 11:17 p.m.