Poisonous Exaltation

Modern affbedran

SCORE: 5 | 20 COMMENTS | 1124 VIEWS | IN 1 FOLDER


affbedran says... #1

I was thinking on maybe adding some more Aqueous Forms to the deck. It is just an effin marvelous card on this list.

It provides a certain hit, granting me the aggressiveness I want, gives me a free scry, allowing top deck control, and has a great synergy with the exalted mechanics and Ajani, Mentor of Heroes XD

The problem is: What should I remove from the deck in order to do that?

December 29, 2014 11:08 a.m.

affbedran says... #2

I'm currently very satisfied with this list =) tried it against some friends of mine and it worked perfectly!

February 6, 2015 9:05 p.m.

Yuri200X says... #3

Curti as criaturas, acho q devia ter mais Aven Squire, Invisible Stalker, Qasali Pridemage e Sigiled Paladin... q assim o deck fica mais aggro, nao sei... posso ta falando caca...Essa Elspeth, Knight-Errant roda mto massa com o deck... a ult dela eu nem acho tao importante, mas colocar as fichas e o buff... eh mto massa.Eu acho q ta faltando mais defesa no deck: Remand e legal e da o draw, mas ele meio q so adia a putanhagem um turno. aquele Qasali Pridemage eu acho top pq ele da exaltado e tira coisas... dai eu acho ele mto bom... acho q deve ser a melhor criatura do deck, na real.Cathedral of War eu acho q devia rodar 4... because of reasons :vela da exaltado e nao pode ser counterada.Eu acho q o Gitaxian Probe podia ser trocada por algo mais counteroso... Mas a ideia do deck ta massa.Eu n sei, mas as Gitaxian Probe tambem da uma do de tirar pq elas podem fazer vc dar o draw da Aqueous Form... e isso nesse deck eh lekau demais :vTalvez aproveitar e colocar 4 Invisible Stalker pq ele eh o q faz o deck matar...Na verdade, acho q suas criaturas mais perigosas sao Invisible Stalker e Aven Squire que ficam fazendo o dano passar reto...Sei la, as possibilidades sao varias... eu pensei em mais Stalker pq fico com vontade de fazer o dano passar... mas eu tenho receio de nego counterar mto, por isso sugeri defesas...Eu acho q os maiores problemas seus sao:Volcanic Fallout, Pyroclasm e esses limpa campo globais... dai sem counter, se vc levar isso na cara eh meio sem volta D:

February 10, 2015 8:41 p.m.

affbedran says... #4

Yuri200X, Nao compensa colocar mais Invisible Stalker por causa do exaltado, porque, apesar de ter o Battlegrace Angel Muitas vezes o jogo acaba antes de ele entrar...

Cathedral of War eu estava rodando 4 no inicio, mas land que entra virada nesse deck acaba dando slow porque preciso botar pressao no early game.

Gitaxian Probe eu nao pretendo tirar a nao ser que eu consiga algo bem melhor pra colocar no lugar e que de draw tbm, pq como voce disse eu preciso do draw pra assegurar que o deck vai ser responsivo.

Brave the Elements ta na list justamente pra ajudar contra sweeps globais =D

February 11, 2015 3 p.m.

NOGzFTW says... #5

February 21, 2015 9:01 p.m.

affbedran says... #6

Hi there NOGzFTW, thanks for the suggestion! In this case I don't think Glistener Elf would really fit. The infect is nice, but it still can be easily blocked, making it an useless effort, so Blighted Agent pretty much covers it up.

Also, the whole infect thing is more like a bonus XD. In 80% of the matches my main attacker is indeed Blighted Agent because he ends the game in a single swing on most cases, but I also have some other pretty good options, like the Archangel and Sigiled Paladin, which end up being better choices sometimes =)

Please upvote if you like the deck

February 21, 2015 9:18 p.m.

NOGzFTW says... #7

if evasion is your problem try Apostle's Blessing for evasion and protection

February 21, 2015 9:20 p.m.

NOGzFTW says... #8

And im going to guess theres no Noble Hierarch because its sixty bucks each

February 21, 2015 9:22 p.m.

affbedran says... #9

Yes (cries a little bit)

February 21, 2015 9:40 p.m.

affbedran says... #10

Apostle's Blessing is actually way better! Thanks =D I hadn't even considered that card

February 21, 2015 9:42 p.m.

NOGzFTW says... #11

i cant run it in my infect deck so dont feel to bad

February 21, 2015 9:42 p.m.

NOGzFTW says... #12

and aswell if you want to push an extra bit of damage try Distortion Strike

February 21, 2015 9:44 p.m.

affbedran says... #13

Hmmm, I took out Aqueous Form because I think there's not much of a need for it now with Apostle's Blessing but I'll really think about Distortion Strike... It's really a bomb

February 21, 2015 9:49 p.m.

jpcunha4 says... #14

Stony Silence seu bosta, cade????????????

June 3, 2015 2:37 p.m.

Dokujin says... #15

Great deck. Just a thought though if this deck is considered budget at $300-plus dollars what's a bling deck for you?

June 8, 2015 6:55 a.m.

affbedran says... #16

Thank you very much! I spent some time on this deck to make it s fun as possible =)

Well Dokujin, I say it's a budget deck because it's a version without Noble Hierarch and without Inkmoth Nexus too, which are the two price lifters of the deck. The bling version of this deck costs about $650-plus dollars. To keep it short, I said it's a budget mostly because I was able to cut the price in half =)

June 8, 2015 6:21 p.m.

Dokujin says... #17

Yeah. That's a fair assessment I just wish I knew a card to sub for those hierarchs.

Most people like myself when searching budget lists look for a genuine budget list of 50 to 100 bucks tops that's the only reason I ask because 300 is a big difference than 650 but I still think it's not really budget.

June 9, 2015 8:15 a.m.

Yuri200X says... #18

On Channel Fireball the "Modern on a Budget" goes for a $200 deck which i think is budget... though this deck is $373 it is not exactly expensive... but i think you should drop the Budget tag, Andre.

June 24, 2015 11:15 p.m.

affbedran says... #19

Hmm, maybe you guys are right. I'll replace that tag with combo =)

July 9, 2015 9:38 a.m.

affbedran says... #20

Updated the Deck's description, as well as the tags.

July 9, 2015 10:40 a.m.

Please login to comment