Femme_Fatale says... #3
Sleight of Hand instead of See Beyond ? Pretty much the same thing but for only one mana.
July 7, 2013 3:54 p.m.
Femme_Fatale says... #4
I was also thinking of putting in more things that bring out tokens but with a cheaper mana cost or a different ability.
Flash Foliage , Origin Spellbomb , Sprout and Pulse of the Tangle .
July 7, 2013 4:03 p.m.
TheRealSean says... #5
In a comment way above you said that a friend once used Cyclonic Rift to send Emrakul back to your hand. Shouldn't that be impossible since Emrakul has protection from all colored spells?
August 7, 2013 8:22 p.m.
TheRealSean Cyclonic Rift and its overload changes the wording so it does not target emrakul specifically its for all creatures I control. Thus allowing it to be used on him as long as its overloaded
August 7, 2013 9 p.m.
TheRealSean says... #7
Oh yeah, that works. I thought he just cast it normally.
August 8, 2013 4:50 a.m.
+1
Was thinking of building something like this. I know it's been awhile since any comments, but would you ever run Mutavault ? Just a thought.
Cool deck!
December 11, 2013 12:48 a.m.
emask hey man thanks for the vote! And no, I haven't thought about it! I could see it working in this deck
December 15, 2013 3:46 p.m.
Just a thought, it's a cool deck you've got. I bet it surprises many.
December 15, 2013 6:57 p.m.
jacobrkimbrell312 says... #11
I wouldn't run progenitus, he can be raced against while emrakul can't
December 24, 2013 3:57 p.m.
I would replace Farseek with another land honestly 2 mana to bring in a land when I can just have one next turn
December 31, 2013 1:12 p.m.
demondevon says... #13
Here's my version. http://tappedout.net/mtg-decks/turn-3-poly-emrakul/ . Safewright quest is just so you can fetch dryad arbor, it needs fetch lands but they are $70 ea atm
February 20, 2014 5:37 p.m.
demondevon says... #16
Thinking of updating my build to include black with Bitterblossom as it can block flyers and you can play it on turn 2. Your mana base will be very expensive though :(
March 4, 2014 2:36 p.m.
Great deck man, +1! You inspired me to build my own version of this deck. Please check it out and leave feedback. Thanks! http://tappedout.net/mtg-decks/mono-blue-polymorph-2/
March 19, 2014 8:18 p.m.
Emrakul-the-Format-Broken says... #18
Umm, Polymorph isn't gonna work with no creatures to Polymorph. Also, Quicksilver Amulet ?
April 3, 2014 8:11 p.m.
Emrakul-the-Format-Broken Look at the deck my friend. I make plenty of tokens to be polymorphed...
May 10, 2014 9:14 p.m.
Mercedes999 says... #21
Try Worldly Tutor it would make it so you can fetch the beaters for Polymorph
July 23, 2014 11:27 a.m.
Emrakul-the-Format-Broken says... #22
Quicksilver Amulet and Elvish Piper look good for when you have Emrakul in your hand.
July 23, 2014 1:58 p.m.
ScribbleDragon says... #23
I really like this deck... but I thought, how about instead of the current land base, run Dryad Arbor as a four of, along with Misty Rainforest and Verdant Catacombs to fetch for it. I'd run these as 4 each over the Breeding Pools, Khalni Gardens, and Halimar Depths, and possibly convert the basic lands into Watery Grave s and maybe one Overgrown Tomb so you could run Abrupt Decay or Inquisition of Kozilek as perhaps a 3 and 3 of over Cyclonic Rift or Awakening Zone.
Being able to crack that fourth fetchland for the very thing you're sacrificing is pretty awesome, because it's rare that your opponent will see that fourth land drop as your guaranteed Emrakul.
July 27, 2014 9:23 a.m.
I used to play a similar deck years ago. 3 creatures is optimal, emrakul, Iona and progenitus. This is pretty proof vs slaughter games, stain the mind etc.
October 22, 2014 5:56 a.m.
ScribbleDragon Yeah I have thought about all of those but I was going for a more budget friendly version. Those additions would help for sure!
xzzane says... #1
Well I decided to change the way I'm doing articles yet again. I'm about as decisive as a cat at this point. You'll probably be the 2nd or 3rd article. And this is for the articles on tappedout. It'll be a lot like the bang for your buck articles.
June 28, 2013 6:19 p.m.