EDH decks usually run 36-40 land and 3 color usually wants the high end of those numbers or even above. Also edh decks are required to be 99 cards then the commander (100 total)

dude..... you're totally missing Filth from this great deck!

Demarge, I know that. I'm trying to narrow it down to ~60 cards from all of my options before adding in the basic lands. It's just been years since I built a remotely competitive EDH deck. Those are the suggestions I was looking for. I guess I wasn't as clear as I thought I was.

Are you trying to use infect as your primary win-con? If so, you may have better luck sticking to a few big infect creatures (Blightsteel Colossus ) instead of trying to field a bunch of weenie infect creatures. The latter tends to eat up deck space and resources while leaving you vulnerable to sweepers.

Thanks Epochalyptik, I'll take that into consideration :)

Are you going for the infinite combo approach?

What's your budget?

Sorry it took me so long to get back to you. Definitely the combo approach, when I saw that combo, I giggled. I've got about $250 set aside, but there's some cards on the list that I don't have. I can find cheaper, not-so-good versions of cards recommended, but if you could mark any that are necessary, I would greatly appreciate it.

Transguild Promenade > Rupture Spire .

Just kidding.

If you added Overgrown Tomb and Breeding Pool , Farseek would be much better than Rampant Growth , and then card:Nature's Lore would be better yet.

And then you could run Skyshroud Claim . Because it's a really stupid-good spell.

Explore , Omniscience , Psychic Possession , Propaganda , Lorescale Coatl , and the signets are kind of underwhelming. I think you should focus more on your combos and adding some utility/control cards.