Jdvanliew did this on my deck but I really don't care. At least he looked at my deck. And now I get to see an awesome deck as well! I don't mind the sharing because it shows me a deck I may not have saw otherwise :D
April 23, 2014 2:53 p.m.
You will receive none of my assistance, I'm not interested in helping a close minded hypocrite like you.
Based on your character, I doubt you would listen anyway.
April 23, 2014 3:15 p.m.
DerpGusta321 says... #8
I have to agree with Tiktacy on all of this. You posted the exact same thing on my deck and I figured I would help you out since you gave my deck attention. But now that I know that you're just spamming that on everyone's deck, I feel as though you don't really deserve a top spot. More than half of your deck's attention is coming from the spam you leave on everyone else's decks. And to make it worse, you didn't even +1 my deck until 30-40 minutes later when I called you out on it. I hope you know that you can see who +1s your decks and I never saw your vote until I told you to hold up your end. Quit spamming people here and get your top spot by deckcycling it or featuring it like everyone else.
April 23, 2014 3:38 p.m.
I do agree with a lot of what's being said as well. Copy/pasting responses from one deck to another without any variation isn't a good way to get views/votes on your deck. We all use the deck cycle/feature queue for this. If everyone did this, 90% of comments would be just advertisements. That wouldn't be fun.
In addition to this, you should definitely +1 if you say you're going to. I mean, you didn't even +1 my Elvephants deck (the one this is based off.)
People are probably frustrated that this generated so many upvotes based on your advertising, considering it's not a generally accepted practice here. When I ask other people to look at my deck, it's for one of two reasons; they either have a lot in common, or I value their opinion on a personal level.
Perhaps it's time for some kind of set-in-stone rule about deck advertising. I'm sure this conflict could've been avoided if there were. No hard feelings to anyone involved in this debate, either. Just my two cents.
April 23, 2014 4 p.m.
4 the most part i agree v4v3 but TBH, its only ONE comment, and it boosts ur decks popularity not only by the plus 1 (which he kept his word on), but also the total comment at first look (like right now this deck has 85 not 84 comments). But i do agree with the whole 90% concept And personally, i think it silly that u guys r having it out in the comments! :P
April 23, 2014 4:19 p.m.
Well, this deck is entirely based off my Infinite Possibility (Elvephants) deck, and that didn't get a +1 from him. That's more or less what I was referring to.
I still see why people wouldn't like it. I'm indifferent, just giving my two cents like I said.
April 23, 2014 4:41 p.m.
Yes, I see you've just done that now. It wasn't there up until a few minutes ago. :)
And I didn't say you did. Considering this brew is about 70% a copy of mine though, I'd say it's reasonable to expect a +1.
April 23, 2014 4:51 p.m.
Bear in mind that the only reason this is being mentioned is because it follows the rhythm of the conversation above. I'd already noticed and decided not to mention it.
April 23, 2014 4:56 p.m.
It's a perfect time to mention it. :)
12/38 cards in your main board are shared, as are a large portion of our mana base. Beyond this, your Axebane Guardian and Overgrown Battlement simply take the place of other ramp-cards in my deck. You did defender, I did elves. I've got Karametra's Acolyte and Elvish Archdruid in place of those cards. So, if you were to count those, that makes 19/38 cards in the main board that are the exact same (or serve the exact same purpose.)
That's 50% of your mainboard. Your land base differs because you have a few more colours. The win condition(s) are exactly the same as mine.
This discussion is over. I won't read or post anything further; best of luck with your deck.
April 23, 2014 5:56 p.m.
FactoryMade says... #19
I feel like substituting two Steam Vents for two Island would make your Misty Rainforest that much better and make your mana base less awkward.
April 25, 2014 10:11 p.m.
@FactoryMade You can search out Steam Vents with Misty Rainforest though. It just ends costing a little bit more life.
April 26, 2014 8:26 a.m.
fadetoblack1183 says... #22
I think you should drop 3 Forest for 3 Sacred Foundry or 3 Arid Mesa . You are running 11 white cards and 12 red cards (between the main and side) and you only have 2 red lands and 2 white lands and only 3 ways to fetch them. I know you have 10 "any color" mana dorks, but I feel this would help smooth out your mana base. The fetchlands would probably be better, since you can grab a land that also makes green mana. Anyways, just my thoughts. The other option would be to cut back a bit on your red or white sideboard cards so you wouldn't rely so heavily on those colors in certain configurations.
May 2, 2014 12:28 p.m.
Dalektable says... #24
I'm familiar with your build, more so with the inspiration this was based off of however (Infinite elephants). It's a fun combo, I'm sure it's a blast to play.
Tiktacy says... #1
"Nice +1! Please check out my most popular modern deck Tap Tap Revenge!"
That is LITERALLY the EXACT same, copy pasted response you have for every deck. How in gods name are you regarding the sections origin!? You are being the pure definition of a spammer.
As for me being a spammer, I have made a grand total of 3 posts, all 3 of those being directly related to the deck. This is the deck you are advertising, where else am I suppose to say this? In a private message so you can call me a spammer in private so other people can't see it? No, it's annoying other people and I want you to see that I'm not the only one.
Please, I'm asking you nicely, just do a daily deck cycle like the rest of us and start being constructive with your responses rather than making them advertisements. You can clear all posts and I'm willing to forget about everything, just please, stop with the copypasta le advertize?
April 23, 2014 1:56 p.m.