only 3 Gallia of the Endless Dance? seems like you would definitely want 4

jonmaior

;egend rule. Having two of her is clunky and inconsistent, slowing down the deck

I know but I feel like having one is probably good enough to win or come close at least so I feel like you want to maximize your chances of drawing it.

jonmaior

Contrary to what it may seem, Gallia did not make or break this deck. It kill fast and ruthless before she was even thought of. All Gallia does is plug the holes that the deck had before. Shes fantastic, shes powerful, shes my favorite card. But I cant justify running four due to consistency. It's just too risky. Now if this were a proven deck that absolutely had a shot to be great, maybe shed be worth the 4 of. But as it stands I cant bring myself to risk it

its a fun concept, and if its just for fun i get that, but what does this offer that simple infect doesn't. i don't mean to just criticize and i don't want to hate i just want to know if i'm missing something

SoggyWaffles777

Bud its Satyr Tribal. I'm lucky the deck is even good at all. It kills just as fast if not slightly faster. If you'd rather play Infect, by all means. If you'd like a comparison. It's basically infect that plays fair.

Ok that does actually answer y question. Also, I really woudnt ever play infect, and with all due respect to people who play infect, its the most annoying bullcrap that anyone could ever play against.

SoggyWaffles777

Yeah man. And it's nothing against infect of course. It's the optimal build of my preferred playstyle. I just prefer to play without a crutch.

you definitely want at least a couple Mutavault here, couple Cavern of Souls too.

8vomit

Much as I'd like to, i can't for consistency's sake. They don't make colored mana for pump spells, so they make the fast kill too inconsistent to be worth a crap. Not a terrible idea though.

Cool deck!