It isn't luck. It is a random organizer where it has a website such as stated above in the game itself. Then it grabs that card from the deck and shuffles ETC. Therefore, there is a minor algorithm to it. I believe MTGO has the one where it is X = Y/2 or Y*2 number and it creates that throughout the deck.
August 13, 2013 8:02 p.m.
Darkness1835 says... #3
The point is, we lost. We're 1-1, and if everyone else loses at least one game, (which is highly possible given it's round robin) we're still in this competition. We've got 5 more matches to play, so let's look forwards, not backwards. We were all team players during the drafting process, let's not have that fall apart just because things aren't going as planned.
August 13, 2013 9:17 p.m.
Agreed
We are 1 - 1, and can still finish 6 - 1 and win this tournament.
August 13, 2013 9:34 p.m.
Darkness1835 says... #6
Our next game, against Deckbuilder345, will be Saturday 8pm, PST.
August 15, 2013 6:48 p.m.
Shiet, I may be able to watch. 10 PM, on a school weekend.
August 15, 2013 7:16 p.m.
Darkness1835 says... #8
Good news after Round 2. Leafs_Suck's team has the only deck that's 2-0. 2nd place is now attainable, and hopefully first soon after this round.
August 16, 2013 2:59 a.m.
If this was a typical 8-man draft with three rounds of swiss, then we'd be boned. Our tiebreakers would stink because we got paired down and lost. But it's a round robin, so we can still get 1st. There are five more games. Anything can happen.
So your game is at 10 pm my local time. I might be able to watch your stream live. YAY! If I miss it, I'll just watch the replay on Sunday morning. Either way, good luck tomorrow night!
August 16, 2013 7:50 a.m.
Damn, 6am here. If I stay awake through the saturday-sunday night I'll watch, otherwise good luck.
August 16, 2013 9:19 a.m.
Darkness1835 says... #11
t-minus 40 minutes! Tune in and watch if you have some free time, or even just to say hi!
August 17, 2013 10:20 p.m.
I should be able to watch the first game if not, GOOD LUCK!
August 17, 2013 10:25 p.m.
Alrighty. I'm on your Channel , but you haven't went live yet. Really excited to be a part of this.
August 17, 2013 10:48 p.m.
While you guys are waiting, can you check out Kalonian Power Train?
August 17, 2013 10:50 p.m.
NobodyPicksBulbasaur says... #15
Well we got crapped on, but I sort of expected that when I saw deckbuilder's deckist. He's got to copies of Putrefy in there, so it would've been hard to punch through without a god hand.
The last matchup was a tough one, too. Getting through 2x Skylasher isn't a problem for most decks. We are not most decks.
Rally cap time. Let's sweep the rest of 'em.
August 19, 2013 9:59 p.m.
actiontech says... #16
I dunno about you guys, but I'm thoroughly embarrassed that I predicted we'd go undefeated. I'm at the point that I hope we end up at .500 now. So crazy that the deck worked so well on cockatrice, and drew out so well but failed so miserably against the opposition we knew was coming (BWx decks.)
August 19, 2013 11:19 p.m.
Yeah, now 0.500 would appear to be a good finish.
We are having trouble dealing with bombs and removal, and we need the combination of cyclops and activators to come together nicely.
August 19, 2013 11:38 p.m.
NobodyPicksBulbasaur says... #18
Such is the fate of the gimmicky deck. It all depends on the draws and luck. We've had poor showings in both categories.
August 20, 2013 6:23 a.m.
Yep, we are thoroughly one trick pony and as such are really weak to bad draws. Since we basically have one line to victory and can't really even deal damage otherwise we are royally screwed if that line fails.
By the way, I think that in the future we should really save blood so we can go to the dome with it. Our deck is always at a race and so I think it's basically better to lose a cyclops as a chump blocker than to take out a potential attacker from the opponent. Remember that with blood we need basically only two cyclops (or even one if we have 6 mana and two cipher cards) that can get through for damage. One Nivix Cyclops
plus two cipher cards does 7 damage on the swing and ciphers raise that cyclops to 13 (how convenient). Then if we Blood
the cyclops we do 13 damage which is lethal in one turn with three tricks, unblocked cyclops and six mana. The point being Blood is usually too good as a straight to dome type of spell in our deck to waste on some random attacker.
August 20, 2013 8:04 a.m.
I think the moment you're referring to was in game 1 when we were down to 8 life and the opponent had an extort/lifelink vampire, a boros mastiff, and a maze sentinel. Using Blood in that situation to get rid of the extort/lifelink vampire was actually the correct play to keep the opponent from gaining life and draining us with every spell he would cast. Also, it turned off his ability to swing with battalion on the next turn, which would have gained the opponent an additional 4 life.
I see your point, and normally I would agree. But making sure we don't die after two more attacks and a couple spells extorted was the right decision.
August 20, 2013 4:25 p.m.
We still have hope. Trust in the power of the comeback/underdog. We got this people.
August 20, 2013 4:38 p.m.
Darkness1835 says... #22
I wish we could modify our mainboard now. Maybe it's strategy time though... Perhaps we should come up with a secondary mainboard that we use every second/third game, since our initial mainboard doesn't seem to be working quite as well as we thought.
August 20, 2013 7:56 p.m.
NobodyPicksBulbasaur says... #23
Really all we can do is plop in Murmuring Phantasm (which I dislike) against really fast decks, and Awe for the Guilds against decks we need another enabler against. Our deck is too gimmicky to deviate from our main plan because we don't have the cardbase to avoid clops.dec
August 20, 2013 8:43 p.m.
actiontech says... #24
No need (or ability really) to change the deck, other than maybe tweak the land base slightly. The deck ran fine for dozens (hundreds?) of playtests until we hit a streak of bad luck draws on MTGO. Luck won't be a permanent problem as I promise to be as far away from the computer as possible during the next match.
August 20, 2013 8:51 p.m.
NobodyPicksBulbasaur says... #25
Our deck may not be super consistent, but it is easily the most fun draft deck I have ever seen. I wouldn't change a thing about it even if we end up 1-6.
It's not about the destination, it's about the journey.
Draugo says... #1
Landgraf Just if you happen to be interested in random numbersthere's this http://www.random.org/. It's not a pseudo random algorithm based generator but atmospheric noise one which is for all intents and purposes truly random (to the extend that any other method of randomization we have is actually random). It is also accessible for any program that actually needs it.
August 13, 2013 7:45 p.m.