Apparently you cant even read your own comments and realize what you have said. I take it you're one of those people who pin the blame on millennials based on what you said about me. All i did was suggest my own ideas yet you decided to come out guns blazing looking for a way to silence me. Insulting me is the wrong way to go. I cant wait to see you block me out of rage quitting in anger! Anything else youd like to try to twist or move blame on? Im listening

Defended my stance on why I use 3 of a spell that's not guns blazing thats having experience with the build and putting it in words for someone who hasn't played it the way I have in my current meta. Why would I block someone over a difference in opinions after my stance on why things are the way they are has already been stated? Both of my initial responses were respectable and the way the word "ignorant" was used was true to dictionary form when aimed at you and not an insult. I first explained why I use only 3 and how it's consistent for me and I second explained why I use only 3 paired with other spells in the deck that make it more fitting for the style of play I want out of the deck. Having 4 would put it in my starting hand more often than I'd like when it can't even be madnessed in to be used as a bolt until the earliest of turn 3 along with my other madness enabled spells barring a few. So 3 keeps it out of my opening hand holding a slot a useful card would take and I can draw into any of the madness spells on turn 2 or 3 when I need them. If you can't/won't see that in either comment then maybe you should block me so you don't have to see the deck or my responses :)

You guys figure out who's d**ks bigger yet so we can get back to magic?

DKO2335 no need for that. It's not my issue he doesn't like my explanation for not playing like he would. This site is meant for different approaches to deck building not a game of copy cat. If he wants to be angry that's fine. I'll still enjoy magic all the same :) What are your takes on the deck?

I liked the deck alot and even ran it at an FNM. Unfortunately my LGS meta just happened to pack alot of answers to it. It managed to outpace mono red burn but ran into walls against angels and mono blue control.

Made a few changes to this deck from KLD and seems to have kept its same potency in the sideboard and mainboard. What do you all think? Changes are in the updates section.

Cool deck, but why are you running Ravenous Bloodseeker over Furyblade Vampire? Furyblade packs a more powerfull punch, and the trample is nice too. Love the deck, and please check out my similar deck, Devilish Vampire Budget. +1 from me!