I think the challenge of killing yourself in the first few turns is important, although those three pacts are just auto wins for your opponent (And you, because you succeeded in your goal).
April 6, 2015 9:52 a.m.
Trockenmatt says... #3
This is such a good deck, I can't believe it doesn't win! I must make this IRL!
May 5, 2015 7:25 p.m.
I approve your approval.
There's a zero% chance that it matters. You get a +1, you get a +1, you also get +1, everyone gets a +1!
May 19, 2015 10:12 p.m.
Trockenmatt says... #7
I wonder, what if you put in Boseiju, Who Shelters All? I mean, it makes your Unexpected Results uncounterable.
May 19, 2015 10:23 p.m.
The_Dragonmaster says... #8
@Trockenmatt hmm, now that is an idea... It makes Gut Shot uncounterable too.
May 20, 2015 1:57 p.m.
Programmer_112 says... #9
Actually, you can't use the colorless to pay for Gut Shot, so it doesn't work with Boseiju :'(
May 20, 2015 2 p.m.
Why don't you just run all the pacts. Such as Summoner's Pact or Pact of the Titan. Then just don't pay the cost. You will consistently win/lose turn 1.
May 23, 2015 3:25 p.m.
The_Dragonmaster says... #14
I may make another deck bent on doing that, but this deck is sticking to it's playstyle.
May 23, 2015 4:21 p.m.
Because that's just as easy as conceding. You need to work hard to give your opponent the win, and probably jump through a lot of hoops.
May 23, 2015 5:08 p.m.
Please do. I would love to hear the rage as all the spikes come and rip your strategy apart. The real winner though is the person who had the most fun, not the one that walked away with the most prizes.
May 23, 2015 9:25 p.m.
StealthyGunnar says... #20
Needs pacts. See the following: Why Win When You Can Lose? and Why Win When You Can Lose? V2
May 27, 2015 5:36 p.m.
I want to run this deck with Near-Death Experience so that anybody without haste or Lightning Bolt T1 just loses if I pull it off.
May 27, 2015 5:42 p.m.
I see you kept my quote! Thanks a ton, I still can't overcome how awesome this deck is.
May 27, 2015 6:05 p.m.
The_Dragonmaster says... #23
Thanks and yes, I love your quote. I couldn't stand just getting rid of it.
May 27, 2015 7:33 p.m.
The_Dragonmaster says... #24
@kengiczar - allthough that would be fun, it doesn't fit the deck.
May 27, 2015 7:36 p.m.
The_Dragonmaster says... #25
@StealthyGunnar - I'm going to keep the deck revolving around Fastbond right now. But that is what the primer is for. I think it mentions the pacts.
Zer0w says... #1
you don't have to name a card in your deck... name Storm Crow... make 'em think there are going to die a bloody death and then you've ended the game. I guess you don't even have to name a card that is a magic card, name a king of spades, a get out of jail free card, or a capitol one credit card or a birthday card from your grandma.
I still don't know why you aren't playing 4 Intervention Pact 4 Pact of the Titan and 4 Summoner's Pact. or at least 2 of each.
and I really really don't know why you ever made this deck!
April 6, 2015 9:48 a.m.