The T1 loss Primer!

Casual The_Dragonmaster

SCORE: 170 | 140 COMMENTS | 11376 VIEWS | IN 14 FOLDERS


Zer0w says... #1

you don't have to name a card in your deck... name Storm Crow... make 'em think there are going to die a bloody death and then you've ended the game. I guess you don't even have to name a card that is a magic card, name a king of spades, a get out of jail free card, or a capitol one credit card or a birthday card from your grandma.

I still don't know why you aren't playing 4 Intervention Pact 4 Pact of the Titan and 4 Summoner's Pact. or at least 2 of each.

and I really really don't know why you ever made this deck!

April 6, 2015 9:48 a.m.

kameenook says... #2

I think the challenge of killing yourself in the first few turns is important, although those three pacts are just auto wins for your opponent (And you, because you succeeded in your goal).

April 6, 2015 9:52 a.m.

Trockenmatt says... #3

This is such a good deck, I can't believe it doesn't win! I must make this IRL!

May 5, 2015 7:25 p.m.

Yup, thanks for the support.

May 5, 2015 7:29 p.m.

Hcassel says... #5

I approve!

May 19, 2015 6:27 p.m.

kameenook says... #6

Hcassel

I approve your approval.

There's a zero% chance that it matters. You get a +1, you get a +1, you also get +1, everyone gets a +1!

May 19, 2015 10:12 p.m.

Trockenmatt says... #7

I wonder, what if you put in Boseiju, Who Shelters All? I mean, it makes your Unexpected Results uncounterable.

May 19, 2015 10:23 p.m.

@Trockenmatt hmm, now that is an idea... It makes Gut Shot uncounterable too.

May 20, 2015 1:57 p.m.

Programmer_112 says... #9

Actually, you can't use the colorless to pay for Gut Shot, so it doesn't work with Boseiju :'(

May 20, 2015 2 p.m.

oh, yeah.

May 20, 2015 6:23 p.m.

dcarson says... #11

I don't see how you came up with your life totals.

May 20, 2015 8:35 p.m.

In the mirror match?

May 23, 2015 9:18 a.m.

FGKG123 says... #13

Why don't you just run all the pacts. Such as Summoner's Pact or Pact of the Titan. Then just don't pay the cost. You will consistently win/lose turn 1.

May 23, 2015 3:25 p.m.

I may make another deck bent on doing that, but this deck is sticking to it's playstyle.

May 23, 2015 4:21 p.m.

kameenook says... #15

FGKG123

Because that's just as easy as conceding. You need to work hard to give your opponent the win, and probably jump through a lot of hoops.

May 23, 2015 5:08 p.m.

Hey guys, should I make a primer on this? lol

May 23, 2015 8:09 p.m.

I'm going to do it XD

May 23, 2015 8:13 p.m.

kameenook says... #18

Please do. I would love to hear the rage as all the spikes come and rip your strategy apart. The real winner though is the person who had the most fun, not the one that walked away with the most prizes.

May 23, 2015 9:25 p.m.

Agreed

May 23, 2015 10:13 p.m.

Needs pacts. See the following: Why Win When You Can Lose? and Why Win When You Can Lose? V2

May 27, 2015 5:36 p.m.

kengiczar says... #21

I want to run this deck with Near-Death Experience so that anybody without haste or Lightning Bolt T1 just loses if I pull it off.

May 27, 2015 5:42 p.m.

kameenook says... #22

I see you kept my quote! Thanks a ton, I still can't overcome how awesome this deck is.

May 27, 2015 6:05 p.m.

Thanks and yes, I love your quote. I couldn't stand just getting rid of it.

May 27, 2015 7:33 p.m.

@kengiczar - allthough that would be fun, it doesn't fit the deck.

May 27, 2015 7:36 p.m.

@StealthyGunnar - I'm going to keep the deck revolving around Fastbond right now. But that is what the primer is for. I think it mentions the pacts.

May 27, 2015 9:56 p.m.

Please login to comment