Weirdstorm is weird. And cool.

Man this deck gets alot of attention, how bout sharing it with my brainwashed deck

No Fork ??

Then you could copy fork, giving you quadruple casting ;)

@DominiCanis777 Should be Increasing Vengeance over Fork though.

Reverberate would be a great card.

I am considering a similar deck in Modern with what we have lying around, I am going to put several Mizzium Skin 's in to keep my enchanted fellows alive. I also feel that creatures who can buff at instant speed are a good idea to keep around in a burn deck like this, such as Chronomaton and Ludevic's Test Subject  ^Flip . I would like 4 vexing devils but alas, we don't seem to have too many of those just sitting around unused...

Chandra's Spitfire , it is kiln fiend with flying, granted it is opponent damage, but is that hard with a burn deck?

Except for the fact that unless i'm wrong with Kiln Fiend and his combo Kiln Fiend will end up as a 10/2 where as Chandra's Spitfire will only be a 4/3 with flying. Does the damage occur 3 separate times allowing Chandra's Spitfire to get to a 10/3? I think the wording and the complexity may just be confusing me.

The Chandra's Spitfire is actually better for this combo. The Kiln Fiend will only trigger once, off of the original cast of the spell. The copies are not cast.

Thus the Kiln Fiend will be a 4/2 after you've triple-cast a spell, whereas the Chandra's Spitfire will be a 10/3 after you've triple-cast a spell that damages the opponent, because those three spells (only one of which is cast and the other two are copied) deal their damage separately from each other, and therefore each individually trigger the spitfire boost.

I played this deck against my golgari simic and it won two of the three matches, I am sufficiently impressed by this deck, but I cant help feeling that there isn't a good enough chance that you will always draw what you need. I have to agree with comments farther up that Browbeat seems more beifical than Thunderous Wrath . I played this deck using friendly mulligan rules but the first hand I draw gave me 3 Thunderous Wrath 's which isnt something you would want against someone who want competition mulligans for obvious reasons. Though I do understand why you would like wrath ((IE 15 damage potential for 3 mana). Browbeat allows for draw power which would make this deck just plan scary. (You either pay 15 life or I draw 6 cards, which do you prefer?)

With the new additions from Dragon's Maze, Melek, Izzet Paragon for your consideration.

I love these simple decks, definite +1

In the event Blistercoil Weird gets Surgical Extraction ed or Slaughter Games out, I would recommend Fork and/or Reverberate . To play thematically, Chandra, the Firebrand would go well as a 1x of.

Also, to ensure Thunderous Wrath is a Miracle draw, I'd utilize Sensei's Divining Top or splash blue for Brainstorm ...

You could go Grapeshot if you can get alot of copies out.

I have a version of this deck mixing blistercoil + dual casting combo with the weirdstorm deck. What i found is an interaction between blistercoil + dual casting and Cerulean Wisps and manamorphose: Cast manamorphose untap trigger goes on stack, copy manamorphose, copy resolves, untap blistercoil copy again, copy resolves. 2 mana in manapool 2 cards drawn.Respond to original manamorphose with a cerulean wisps and untap blistercoil again from its trigger. now u can tap it to copy cerulean wisp 1 time. and use the untap from the copy to copy the original manamorphose again. in this proces u draw 4 cards and if u picked-up more cerulean wisps/ other untap instants/ manaabilities you could loop this proces for a very long time, because your original manamorphose and cerulean wisps haven't resolved yet.

Am I right in assuming that you can keep responding to the original spells with new spells and that it would cause the blistercoil to untap?

Im wondering if this interaction is actually correct, if not please correct me on it.

Does this combo work? A copied spell isn't cast, so Blistercoil Weird shouldn't untap.

Just looked at the ruling, sorry this deck doesn't work. Here:

The copy is created on the stack, so it's not "cast." Abilities that trigger when a player casts a spell won't trigger. The copy will then resolve like a normal spell, after players get a chance to cast spells and activate abilities.

I see now, I didn't think that his ability would go on the stack, this is nice. Goes to show how tricky and complex these rules are at times, but my bad.