Spell Queller atleast sideboard

[el_mayo] thank you for your suggestion! I switched out Reflector Mage for it in the sideboard. Whilst it would be sweet to play it main, I want to blank all my opponents removal.

el_mao thank you for your suggestion! I've switched out Reflector Mage for it in the sideboard. Would love to play it mainboard but I want to blank all my opponents removal.

you kinda need reflector mage in main, especially in this meta

I'd recommend two changes to the deck. Firstly, I'd say that you should replace one of the Evolving Wilds with another Westvale Abbey  ^Flip so you have better odds of getting it so you can more reliably get Olmendahl. Secondly, I would definitely find a way to get Reflector Mage into the deck, it is absolutely necessary for a UW control deck at the moment.

Thought about a couple of Skywhaler's Shot in the main deck? It is great against pretty much everything and will help you take out the inevitable skyships and Fleetwheel Cruisers

PeteBedwell thanks for the suggestion! Skywhaler's Shot fits in perfectly. I can see Smuggler's Copter getting annoying, so an answer I can re-cast with Torrential Gearhulk is just what this deck needs.

No worries. Another thought I had today is that with all the creature recursion - Prized Amalgam, Haunted Dead, Scrapheap Scrounger, etc., a couple of extra Declaration in Stone in the sideboard to exile would be a solid idea. I am adding them into my sideboard for my WU Flash Control deck from tomorrow

Why Void Shatter over Scatter to the Winds?

PeteBedwell I do like more Declaration in Stone, but the sorcery speed puts me off a little. I have Stasis Snare in the sideboard to fill a similar role. Stasis Snare also stops vehicles and can catch an Emrakul, the Promised End on my opponents turn.

toxicmash I feel Void Shatter is slightly better because it stops all of the creatures with graveyard synergies, such as the ones discussed by PeteBedwell in his comment (e.g. Prized Amalgam ). I did test Scatter to the Winds, but the late game 3/3 wasn't really that impressive.

Okay thank you!:)