UW Tempered Tantrum

Standard* CardMinnow

SCORE: 6 | 37 COMMENTS | 2173 VIEWS


I feel like Tezzeret's GambitMTG Card: Tezzeret's Gambit should be mainboard, i've been running Tempered SteelMTG Card: Tempered Steel and variants on it since last september, and I ran infect steel about 4 months ago and it turned out nice. Angelic DestinyMTG Card: Angelic Destiny seems like it'd be killer. I think Venser is pretty good, just for its unblockable but i'd reccomend something that lets you profit from his +2 ability. A good card tthat also stays on target would be contagion clasp. Proliferation, removal, and great target for venser. One last note, i feel like Artful DodgeMTG Card: Artful Dodge isn't as good as it could be in this deck. Maybe another cantrip or a Mutagenic GrowthMTG Card: Mutagenic Growth would serve better?

May 14, 2012 7:56 a.m.

CardMinnow says... #2

Artful DodgeMTG Card: Artful Dodge is just another win condition, mainly against swarm/stall decks. The deck doesn't do well late game, and I feel like Artful DodgeMTG Card: Artful Dodge helps sneak in the last couple of points of damage. With that said, I do think they could be better, but Mutagenic GrowthMTG Card: Mutagenic Growth doesn't get there unless they have no creatures, in which case, I've probably already won; and Contagion ClaspMTG Card: Contagion Clasp always feels so slow, but against control it is a good option, so I will have to keep it in mind while I'm testing this week.

You are completely correct in that Venser, the SojournerMTG Card: Venser, the Sojourner is there almost purely for his -1, but +2ing an Oblivion RingMTG Card: Oblivion Ring is pretty good, and against some match-ups I will be siding in Day of JudgmentMTG Card: Day of Judgment, which makes his +2 nearly broken. The thing with Venser, the SojournerMTG Card: Venser, the Sojourner's +2 is that whenever he hits the table, I want to be winning that turn with his -1. I understand that that will not always happen, but I feel that it will happen a lot.

I'm not sure where I would put Tezzeret's GambitMTG Card: Tezzeret's Gambit at this point, but I do agree that it is very good in longer games. It gives a certain amount of reach, and restocks your hand a little, which is great, I'm just not sure where to put it. It was actually a "I need another side-board card, ummm..... Gambit, that'll work" type of card, so I'm almost looking to replace it completely. I will try it out main throughout the week though and let you know.

Thanks for all the advice, I hope you don't feels like I'm just shooting down all your ideas, because I do like them, I'm just also trying to explain why we put the things there in the first place.

May 14, 2012 12:23 p.m.

CardMinnow says... #3

Artful DodgeMTG Card: Artful Dodge is just another win condition, mainly against swarm/stall decks. The deck doesn't do well late game, and I feel like Artful DodgeMTG Card: Artful Dodge helps sneak in the last couple of points of damage. With that said, I do think they could be better, but Mutagenic GrowthMTG Card: Mutagenic Growth doesn't get there unless they have no creatures, in which case, I've probably already won; and Contagion ClaspMTG Card: Contagion Clasp always feels so slow, but against control it is a good option, so I will have to keep it in mind while I'm testing this week.

You are completely correct in that Venser, the SojournerMTG Card: Venser, the Sojourner is there almost purely for his -1, but +2ing an Oblivion RingMTG Card: Oblivion Ring is pretty good, and against some match-ups I will be siding in Day of JudgmentMTG Card: Day of Judgment, which makes his +2 nearly broken. The thing with Venser, the SojournerMTG Card: Venser, the Sojourner's +2 is that whenever he hits the table, I want to be winning that turn with his -1. I understand that that will not always happen, but I feel that it will happen a lot.

I'm not sure where I would put Tezzeret's GambitMTG Card: Tezzeret's Gambit at this point, but I do agree that it is very good in longer games. It gives a certain amount of reach, and restocks your hand a little, which is great, I'm just not sure where to put it. It was actually a "I need another side-board card, ummm..... Gambit, that'll work" type of card, so I'm almost looking to replace it completely. I will try it out main throughout the week though and let you know.

Thanks for all the advice, I hope you don't feels like I'm just shooting down all your ideas, because I do like them, I'm just also trying to explain why we put the things there in the first place.

May 14, 2012 12:24 p.m.

CardMinnow says... #4

Artful DodgeMTG Card: Artful Dodge is just another win condition, mainly against swarm/stall decks. The deck doesn't do well late game, and I feel like Artful DodgeMTG Card: Artful Dodge helps sneak in the last couple of points of damage. With that said, I do think they could be better, but Mutagenic GrowthMTG Card: Mutagenic Growth doesn't get there unless they have no creatures, in which case, I've probably already won; and Contagion ClaspMTG Card: Contagion Clasp always feels so slow, but against control it is a good option, so I will have to keep it in mind while I'm testing this week.

You are completely correct in that Venser, the SojournerMTG Card: Venser, the Sojourner is there almost purely for his -1, but +2ing an Oblivion RingMTG Card: Oblivion Ring is pretty good, and against some match-ups I will be siding in Day of JudgmentMTG Card: Day of Judgment, which makes his +2 nearly broken. The thing with Venser, the SojournerMTG Card: Venser, the Sojourner's +2 is that whenever he hits the table, I want to be winning that turn with his -1. I understand that that will not always happen, but I feel that it will happen a lot.

I'm not sure where I would put Tezzeret's GambitMTG Card: Tezzeret's Gambit at this point, but I do agree that it is very good in longer games. It gives a certain amount of reach, and restocks your hand a little, which is great, I'm just not sure where to put it. It was actually a "I need another side-board card, ummm..... Gambit, that'll work" type of card, so I'm almost looking to replace it completely. I will try it out main throughout the week though and let you know.

Thanks for all the advice, I hope you don't feels like I'm just shooting down all your ideas, because I do like them, I'm just also trying to explain why we put the things there in the first place.

May 14, 2012 12:24 p.m.

EleshBlade says... #5

Venser, the SojournerMTG Card: Venser, the Sojourner's -1 is intriguing, but he does cost 5 mana, seems pretty difficult to cast. I like Signal PestMTG Card: Signal Pest in this deck to try and get a faster win if you don't draw Tempered SteelMTG Card: Tempered Steel, Signal PestMTG Card: Signal Pest + Inkmoth NexusMTG Card: Inkmoth Nexus is a good plan.

May 14, 2012 3:32 p.m.

quargur says... #6

-2 Venser -1 Angelic Destiny +3 Livewire LashMTG Card: Livewire Lash

and -4 Oblivion Ring for +4 Mutagenic GrowthMTG Card: Mutagenic Growth

May 14, 2012 3:53 p.m.

CardMinnow says... #7

Yes, Venser, the SojournerMTG Card: Venser, the Sojourner is 5 mana, but by that time you should have blue up. He is there for the late game since this deck does almost nothing late game.

Signal PestMTG Card: Signal Pest does seem really good, and it was an option in the previous version of this deck, but I'm not convinced. Here is my line of thinking:

Replacing Artful DodgeMTG Card: Artful Dodge: Pros: More sustained damage and slightly faster clocksCons: Less late game presence and not as good against token decks, especially Lingering SoulsMTG Card: Lingering Souls, which is everywhere.

Replacing PonderMTG Card: Ponder:Pros: Faster clocks and an actual effect on the board.Cons: Loss of any form of draw until g2, still gets blocked by Lingering SoulsMTG Card: Lingering Souls

Replacing: Apostle's BlessingMTG Card: Apostle's BlessingPros: More damage against an empty board, or with no flyersCons: Apostle's BlessingMTG Card: Apostle's Blessing is the only protection I have against targeted removal, and it can help swing through board stalls.

May 14, 2012 3:55 p.m.

CardMinnow says... #8

@quargurI like the idea of Livewire LashMTG Card: Livewire Lash and will test with it, but I think it will be slower than Angelic DestinyMTG Card: Angelic Destiny and I would lose my only removal by taking out Oblivion RingMTG Card: Oblivion Ring for Mutagenic GrowthMTG Card: Mutagenic Growth, it does make Artful DodgeMTG Card: Artful Dodge really good though.

Thanks for the ideas.

May 14, 2012 4 p.m.

CardMinnow says... #9

@Quagur

I'm sorry I ever questioned you, I just solitaried the deck with you changes and I consistently did lethal on turn 5 with an unblockable creature. I am strongly considering making those changes, as soon as I can find 3 Livewire LashMTG Card: Livewire Lash.

May 14, 2012 4:21 p.m.

This deck is... odd, to say the least. You said you like where you are with the mainboard, but you would like some help with the sideboard. Probably for the better, as this deck feels so unfamiliar to me, that the advice I would give would probably be off-center (like, my first thought was "Four Mutagenic GrowthMTG Card: Mutagenic Growth and Apostle's BlessingMTG Card: Apostle's Blessing?? What?"). The sideboard, as we know, is more meta dependent. Being pretty familiar with the standard meta, my comments should be alright here.

First off, you might as well switch NegateMTG Card: Negate for Mana LeakMTG Card: Mana Leak, and drop to 3. The only reason you don't want Mana LeakMTG Card: Mana Leak mainboard is Cavern of SoulsMTG Card: Cavern of Souls. Against decks that don't run Cavern Mana LeakMTG Card: Mana Leak can answer more things. If you really insist on a hard counter try DissipateMTG Card: Dissipate.

Day of JudgmentMTG Card: Day of Judgment seems like it will be hurting you... or is the strategy to play the day, and in response play Apostle's BlessingMTG Card: Apostle's Blessing to shield one of your creatures? If so... eh, I'm still not sold on it. I would use a catch-all spot removal like Oblivion RingMTG Card: Oblivion Ring instead. Sure it doesn't combo with Livewire LashMTG Card: Livewire Lash, but the best combo you get out of using Day of JudgmentMTG Card: Day of Judgment is dealing an extra two damage to the player. With infect, we can equate that to four regular damage. Not terrible, but in my opinion, not worth sacrificing our own creatures.

Ooh, if you're using it to pop tokens, how about Ratchet BombMTG Card: Ratchet Bomb?

Tezzeret's GambitMTG Card: Tezzeret's Gambit is next. Hmm. This seems relatively powerful in the control match-up, allowing you to gain card advantage and proliferate poison (and maybe -1/-1) counters. All in all, I don't feel like it's powerful to warrant a spot. If control is on their a-game, their going to be keeping off the poison counters as long as possible, neutering Tezzeret's GambitMTG Card: Tezzeret's Gambit and making it a simple DivinationMTG Card: Divination early to mid-game. In this slot, I would recommend graveyard hate such as Grafdigger's CageMTG Card: Grafdigger's Cage, Surgical ExtractionMTG Card: Surgical Extraction or Nihil SpellbombMTG Card: Nihil Spellbomb, to solidify game two against reanimator.

Finally, we get to SpellskiteMTG Card: Spellskite. I assume you board him in against heavy creature-killing decks, to take the heat off of your infect creatures. He's kind of like a redundant Apostle's BlessingMTG Card: Apostle's Blessing. It dies to boardwipes though, and while it is very versatile, it doesn't have infect (or even a positive power). I'm wondering if something like Faith's ShieldMTG Card: Faith's Shield or Turn AsideMTG Card: Turn Aside might fill this role better.

Anyway, that's just my two cents. I hope this is helpful to you.

May 14, 2012 7:04 p.m.

fireteam says... #11

@"PhyrexianAssimilator"

" Day of JudgmentMTG Card: Day of Judgment seems like it will be hurting you... or is the strategy to play the day, and in response play Apostle's BlessingMTG Card: Apostle's Blessing to shield one of your creatures?"

Um, protection doesn't stop DoJ. It stops:

D.E.B.T.

Damage

Enchant/Equip

Block

Target

"Destroy" isn't included in that :) Ergo, your statement is false.

May 14, 2012 9:53 p.m.

SandyDufresne says... #12

Possibly MortarpodMTG Card: Mortarpod for the finisher.

May 14, 2012 10:23 p.m.

vila_a23 says... #13

I like the idea of the deck, using tempered steel to buff your infect artifacts. The problem is though that right now in the meta there is just so much artifact hate that it makes it hard to play. Casual I think this deck would be amazing, competitive though, I can see it consistantly winning on game 1 but on games 2 and 3 after your opponent sideboards in ancient grudge, divine offering, revoke existence, etc. I can see you having some trouble. Maybe add in some Blighted AgentMTG Card: Blighted Agents since you already have blue mana, or maybe splash green for some glistener elves and titanic growths. Honestly I like the U/G version of infect better, it seems to consistantly swing for game on like turn 3 or 4, but the idea you have going is interesting.

May 14, 2012 10:42 p.m.

i agree that there is a lot of artifact hate in this meta but, in each respective deck there isnt enough to deal with twelve 2 drops and inkmoths. Ive played against this deck and landed 3 naturalizes and a counter spell and still lost turn 5-6. And Apostle's BlessingMTG Card: Apostle's Blessing is a great counter to any targeted removal.

This deck absolutly recks the meta right now and i believe the only deck that can trump this one is maybe tokens (debatable).

Frites loses turn 3-5 and its only saving grace is ancient gruge in the side board.

Solar flare... dies. a resolved Elesh Norn, Grand CenobiteMTG Card: Elesh Norn, Grand Cenobite is neutilized by Tempered SteelMTG Card: Tempered Steel.

Pod gets merced on incridibly fast and all targeted removal can be shut down or neutilized by play another creature.

the only thing that can shut this down is Melira, Sylvok OutcastMTG Card: Melira, Sylvok Outcast

....uh huh keep looking.... no spot removal. its not a huge deal but if you deck loses to one card by itself...blah blah blah, put Oblivion RingMTG Card: Oblivion Rings or DispatchMTG Card: Dispatches in the side for g3

This deck is really good right now.

May 14, 2012 11:54 p.m.

CardMinnow says... #15

@ PhyrexianAssimilator

Thank you for all you thoughts, the sideboard wasn't changed when I went to a Livewire LashMTG Card: Livewire Lash Combo-ish deck, so it is all fairly bad.

I like the NegateMTG Card: Negate specifically for playing against control, my creatures get to big to deal with and I have 8 cards that make them unblockable, so the only thing I need to counter is non-creature spells, which is why I choose NegateMTG Card: Negate over Mana LeakMTG Card: Mana Leak. Otherwise I would be behind you 100%

Day of JudgmentMTG Card: Day of Judgment was good in the old deck because of the Inkmoth NexusMTG Card: Inkmoth Nexus and Venser, the SojournerMTG Card: Venser, the Sojourner tricks, but I fully agree that they are useless now. Oblivion RingMTG Card: Oblivion Ring seems the best choice, although Ratchet BombMTG Card: Ratchet Bomb will probably be a 2 of. DispatchMTG Card: Dispatch is good, but I seldom have problems with creatures, and even less often have Metalcraft, oddly.

Tezzeret's GambitMTG Card: Tezzeret's Gambit was a filler card, mostly because it said "proliferate." Graveyard hate is a great idea that I didn't even think of, since I don't see much reanimator where I have been playing. So, 3-4 Grafdigger's CageMTG Card: Grafdigger's Cage? Maybe Surgical ExtractionMTG Card: Surgical Extraction, we'll see.

I still like SpellskiteMTG Card: Spellskite, though I do see you points, Turn AsideMTG Card: Turn Aside seems like it would be really good. The reason I think I'll be sticking with SpellskiteMTG Card: Spellskite though is that I play against a lot, like A LOT, of Birthing PodMTG Card: Birthing Pod and being able to block Viridian EmissaryMTG Card: Viridian Emissary forever is good as well, and heavy kill decks will have 8-12 kill spells, against my 4 Apostle's BlessingMTG Card: Apostle's Blessing, seems like a bad matchup personally, but I will test it out.

Also, DoJ doesn't target, it won't trigger Livewire LashMTG Card: Livewire Lash, just so you know, and what FireTeam said too.

@Geoff_of_Biscuits

I tried MortarpodMTG Card: Mortarpod but I didn't like it personally, if I ever have more than 2 creatures in play (besides the Inkmoth NexusMTG Card: Inkmoth Nexus I have over commited, since I only have 12 total), but it is a good idea.

@vila_a23

Thanks for the feedback, but I think that SlinsgDiamonds is right here and summed up everything fairly well. But, UG infect is also very fun to play, and I might try it out again eventually.

May 15, 2012 12:26 a.m.

Yeah, sorry, still getting used to the rulings on Day of JudgmentMTG Card: Day of Judgment. Only recently found out protection doesn't guard against it, and I just didn't think it all the way through when I commented about Livewire LashMTG Card: Livewire Lash.

Your sideboard should be decided ultimately on your meta... so if you're not seeing any reanimator, but a ton of pod decks, toss the graveyard hate and put in some more pod hate. I don't really know what that would be, because I have very little experience against pod. Torpor OrbMTG Card: Torpor Orb, maybe?

May 15, 2012 2:03 a.m.

CardMinnow says... #17

Torpor OrbMTG Card: Torpor Orb would work, but so does Oblivion RingMTG Card: Oblivion Ring and NegateMTG Card: Negate. Also, I'm going to a different store for FNM this week, so since I'm not sure what the meta is there I'm just siding for the standard meta-game.

May 15, 2012 2:08 a.m.

Ah I see. Well good luck. Consider recording a play-by-play and typing it up here so that people can get a hands-on feel of the deck.

May 15, 2012 2:21 a.m.

CardMinnow says... #19

Hmmm....I really like the idea of Faith's ShieldMTG Card: Faith's Shield either replacing Artful DodgeMTG Card: Artful Dodge or SpellskiteMTG Card: Spellskite. I need to do more testing, but Cockatrice doesn't seem to be working. :(

May 15, 2012 4:25 p.m.

CardMinnow says... #20

I'm thinking of cutting one Angelic DestinyMTG Card: Angelic Destiny for the fourth Livewire LashMTG Card: Livewire Lash. The deck has become almost a Livewire Combo deck instead of the Tempered SteelMTG Card: Tempered Steel deck it started as, and as such it seems right to do so. The only problem is that it hurts my chances of a t4 win (t1: Land; t2: 2-drop guy; t3: Tempered SteelMTG Card: Tempered Steel, swing for 3; t4: Angelic DestinyMTG Card: Angelic Destiny, swing for 7 in the air for lethal), but that doesn't happen often anyway, and it is really fragile, any form of disruption kills it.

The other change I'm considering is replacing Artful DodgeMTG Card: Artful Dodge with Faith's ShieldMTG Card: Faith's Shield to better protect my combo. There have been many times that I have wished an Artful DodgeMTG Card: Artful Dodge in my hand was an Apostle's BlessingMTG Card: Apostle's Blessing. But than I lose my UU: 4 Infect to the face, and the unblockability is slightly more conditional, but still possible.

May 16, 2012 1:52 p.m.

Emrakool says... #21

Have you tried Blighted AgentMTG Card: Blighted Agent as a built-in unblockable infect creature to throw Livewire LashMTG Card: Livewire Lash on? Know it doesn't fit with the Tempered SteelMTG Card: Tempered Steel theme but it's an idea.

May 17, 2012 3:15 a.m.

kaleth91 says... #22

I still feel like there is room to squeeze Phyrexian MetamorphMTG Card: Phyrexian Metamorph into the deck or sideboard somewhere. I suggested this to you on Cockatrice and you admitted you liked access to the clone effect, especially in late game situations.

May 17, 2012 4:12 p.m.

CardMinnow says... #23

I have thought about it, and I will be making that deck later. But for now I'm keeping it where it is because I have to play it tonight, and have no more time to test it out. Thanks for the thought though.

May 18, 2012 2:30 p.m.

I'll tell you what I've been telling everyone and suggest that you record a play-by-play of the deck. I would like to see an in-depth look at how you play the deck and how the meta reacts to it. If you don't want to go to all of the trouble of a play-by-play, another good option is simply summarizing the games that you play. Either way, I'd like to know how you did and what decks you faced if you don't mind sharing.

May 18, 2012 2:46 p.m.

CardMinnow says... #25

I'm brining paper to FNM tonight so I can record it for a friend who helped to build this deck because he can't be there. I'll post it in an update, umm... soon-ish. (I don't know if I'll get online this weekend, but on Monday for sure.)

May 18, 2012 3:16 p.m.

Please login to comment