MisterTweetums says... #2
Krob86, Thanks for your kind works. I initially wanted to include him in one of my zombie decks, but he seemed too cool for me not to make a deck dedicated solely to him.
February 26, 2015 12:52 p.m.
MisterTweetums says... #3
So I'm trying to find room to potentially put in yawgmoth's will (simply because it's one of the few ways for me to get my artifacts back from the grave) as well as karn liberated or karn, silver golem (in order to fend off other artifact based decks)
February 26, 2015 1:22 p.m.
Those would be good adds. I would pull weaker equipment to do so.
February 26, 2015 3:02 p.m.
MisterTweetums says... #6
ApocryphalSaint, I know right? That's why I got infernal darkness up in this bitch too :p. Any suggestions? I'm planning on putting a maze of ith in deck, but trying to find a way to infinitely untap it. maze of ith with crawlspace is just amazing, since I am more than likely to get targeted for running voltron.
February 27, 2015 7:42 p.m.
Upvoted because it is mean, funny, and that name is amazing.
+1
March 1, 2015 12:21 a.m.
MisterTweetums says... #8
ness64: Thanks ness, the name kind of just came to me (unfortunately it started off as a Ryan Dunn joke) any recommendations are welcomed.
March 1, 2015 1:53 a.m.
Quicksilver says... #9
MisterTweetums regrettably there is no way to untap Maze of Ith without an infinite mana combo. You could turn it into an artifact with Liquimetal Coating and infinitely untapped it with Voltaic Construct, but it's very unlikely you would get all the cards on the field to pull it off.
March 1, 2015 1:37 p.m.
MisterTweetums says... #10
Quicksilver I see, thanks for your input. I guess I'll need another way to keep the board in check besides wrath spells. Any advice on how to protect my board from creature heavy decks?
March 2, 2015 12:49 a.m.
Quicksilver says... #11
Victimize would bring back Sheoldred should it come to that, but sacrificing creatures is obviously something not to be taken lightly. While stupidly expensive, In Garruk's Wake is essentially a destructive cyclonic rift.
March 2, 2015 1:32 a.m.
MisterTweetums says... #12
I'm debating on shelling out the money for a damnation
March 2, 2015 2:34 a.m.
All Is Dust. It hits your commander but leaves your artifacts (and Karn, if you have it) untouched.
March 15, 2015 11:24 a.m.
MisterTweetums says... #14
Ruffigan , I have tested out all is dust and it just didn't work for me. I am putting in boseiju into the deck through so I may reconsider that decision.
March 15, 2015 11:26 a.m.
MisterTweetums says... #16
Hey everyone I made some changes to the deck and would really appreciate it if I could get some feedback. Thank you!
May 20, 2015 5:02 a.m.
MisterTweetums says... #17
Another update guys, PLEASE GIVE ME SOME FEEDBACK :)
May 23, 2015 7:12 a.m.
Bitterblossom is expensive but it works really well with Contamination and they curve perfectly off of eachother
May 25, 2015 11:25 a.m.
MisterTweetums says... #20
I would like to put in bitter-blossom but no one in my area has it. I was debating on putting in ophiomancer but ended up not doing it. Anyone else have some suggestions? I was thinking about quietus spike
May 25, 2015 11:52 a.m.
MisterTweetums says... #21
Was able to get a bitterblossom, and discovered an amazing new equipment. Masterwork of ingenuity!!! I love 1 drop batterskulls :p.
May 28, 2015 1:44 a.m.
jpgcoleman says... #22
Buried Ruin might be a good add. You can also think about Crucible of Worlds along with. Trading Post can also be good for artifact recursion with additional versatility.
June 4, 2015 2:06 p.m.
you could add Living Death because it loops with your commander
June 20, 2015 5:19 p.m.
sac commander to retrieve anything, let him go to your graveyard, living death to bring him back, sac him and put him in graveyard to get living death back again, then play living death, etc. Infinite casts of Living death. Annoys the heck out of your opponents.
Krob86 says... #1
Reading only the commander and this deck is awesome. Plus one for using old mechanic that most people don't have an answer for.
February 26, 2015 8:10 a.m.