The Power of Eldrazi Displacer
Commander (EDH) forum
Posted on Feb. 21, 2016, 11:10 p.m. by Midna-Kun
So I recently started running Eldrazi Displacer in my Roon of the Hidden Realm blink deck, and it's been an absolute monster, better than Deadeye Navigator. It kills tokens, unattaches equipment, allows creatures to attack unhindered, reuses ETB effects, resets counters, the list goes on. Is this just a meta/playgroup thing I'm experiencing, or have other groups been experiencing similar bustedness?
Edit: "unattaches", not "unattached"
UpperDeckerTaco says... #3
...Unless you mean forcing their creatures to become unattached from their currently equipped equipments
February 21, 2016 11:16 p.m.
While that is true for Equipment it will still remove Auras. The Auras won't have anything to enchant and will go to the Graveyard.
So it would be useful to remove Auras, and to make the player pay a new Equip tax.
February 21, 2016 11:32 p.m.
RoarMaster says... #6
I have thought about running him in Roon, but I didnt want to have to dilute my land/rock base with a bunch of colorless sources.
February 22, 2016 1:47 a.m.
PookandPie says... #7
I run 10 sources of colorless mana and I've found that to be extremely sufficient for abusing Eldrazi Displacer. The OP only runs 11 unless I missed one. The only thing he did that I did not do is include 1 Wastes to nab with Farhaven Elf/Solemn Simulacrum.
That said, I like the card well enough. The fact that it blinks instead of flickers is why it can force the Peregrine Drake/Palinchron combo much easier. The biggest downside to it is that it can't protect itself at all, but then again, if your opponents aren't dumb, neither can Deadeye.
A Deadeye by any other name still smells as sweet. Here's hoping Deadeye smells sweet, anyway. Honestly, going by the picture, I imagine he smells like mildew.
February 22, 2016 3:35 a.m.
Colorless should be relatively easy for almost any EDH deck to produce. Stuff like Reliquary Tower produce 
. Most decks run enough utility lands to produce the limited amount required. Every deck should be running Sol Ring too which produces .
February 22, 2016 3:48 a.m.
PookandPie says... #9
Notwithstanding in a 3 color deck like Roon, most people are already running 3 Shadowmoor/Eventide filters.
Kor Haven, Temple of the False God, etc., are also typical inclusions, and mono and dual colored decks can afford more nonbasics that have additional abilities than tri-colored decks can. Hitting 9-11 colorless sources really isn't that difficult even in three color..
February 22, 2016 4:05 a.m.
RoarMaster says... #10
iAzire, PookandPie, yes it is easy to run that many colorless sources in an EDH deck, but it is far from optimal in a 3 color deck. I run Alchemist's Refuge, Winding Canyons, Temple of the False God, and Vesuva for colorless lands, and Sol Ring, Thran Dynamo, and Basalt Monolith for other sources. I just dont think 7 sources is reliable enough. Yes I could include sub-par cards like Reliquary Tower in order to up its applicability, but it detracts from other areas. I dont really need to hold more than 7 cards in my hand after all. Displacer is a good card, but I dont think its worth skewing the deck for it, but if you are already running a ton of colorless, why not then.
February 22, 2016 6:40 a.m.
PookandPie says... #11
You mean you no longer run Yavimaya Hollow, Arcane Lighthouse, Krosan Verge, Opal Palace? Also, Vesuva doesn't produce colorless unless it copies a land that produces such. I'm guessing you probably meant Thespian's Stage.
Also, as for what you're saying with, "it's far from optimal to run that many colorless sources in an EDH deck," I need you to take a look at my Roon deck adn tell me its mana base is suboptimal. Please. Roon of the Fun Police. I regularly open with green on turn 1, white on turn 2 and blue on the third turn, so I'm not buying that my deck's mana base is somehow less optimal than one that runs Treva's Ruins. I think the worst land I'm running is probably Brushland or Seaside Citadel, honestly.
Flooded Grove, Mystic Gate, Wooded Bastion are also colorless sources, which are three of the cards I mentioned. Run those in your Roon deck, and you'd be at 10. That's how many I have, and I use Displacer fine.
If you don't think your mana base can handle it, that's fine, and it's not like you can do something with Displacer that you couldn't with Deadeye Navigator or Mistmeadow Witch anyway. However, a more optimal mana base can probably handle it better than a suboptimal one could, and having a few more colorless sources doesn't make a deck's mana base any less optimal when 3 of those sources could easily be the Shadowmoor/Eventide filters.
February 22, 2016 6:56 a.m.
RoarMaster says... #12
PookandPie Yeah I have removed Opal Palace due to the fact that I never cast roon, arcane lighthouse as there is not alot of hexproof in my current meta,and Krosan Verge just was too slow. Hollow should probably have stayed but I needed it for another deck and keeping stuff alive isnt very important with roon. And yeah, I did mean Thespians stage, lol, not vesuva.
I am all about the value plays, and the Rav Karoos and Treva's Ruins are great enablers for sweet plays, thats why I keep them in. They allow me to bounce things like Mosswort Bridge for re-use, bounce lands like Drifting Meadow for late game cycling, ect ect. If you cannot play into their drawbacks, then yes, bounce lands can suck, but properly used they make for cool and interactive plays.
I mean sure, If I wanted to spend 4x as much money, over an extra $1000, I could have a mana base that could support Displacer easily, just like you. But I have a mortgage and a life to spend my money on, and cant afford it unfortunately.
February 22, 2016 2:42 p.m.
Bounce are really just too slow. They come in tapped AND return another land to your hand. They can have their uses in two color but they get statistically worse in three colors. You have up to 3 lands coming in tapped and returning cards to hand.
Then with what you said about not running a format staple like Reliquary Tower, what are you doing with all the cards in hand? Your plays are being slowed by mana coming in tapped, hand filling up with bounced cards.
It would be fairly late before your mana base settles at which point your opponent has either won, is about to win, or has a vastly stronger board state.
Lands that come in tapped just aren't usually competitive, let alone returning another card.
Good three color can easily run Fetches, at least the 5 just printed in Khans as they are cheap. Shocks are cheap. Filter Lands can tap for and for one of either color, produce 2 that you can use. The only thing that really makes a 3 or even 5 color mana base expensive is the ABUR Duals. All can come in Untapped. If you can afford slow mana, the Shocks can come in tapped.
February 22, 2016 3:38 p.m.
PookandPie says... #14
Good sir, you don't need Savannah, Tundra, Tropical Island to support Displacer- they produce colored mana, after all. I got my duals for roughly $30 a piece years ago, so that's no big deal to me at this point in time. My point in, "Tell me that my deck's mana base is not as optimal as yours" was to eliminate the arbitrary statement of, "At least 10 colorless sources in EDH is not optimal."
What I said was: If you run Flooded Grove, Mystic Gate, and Wooded Bastion, you would have 10 colorless sources, which is the same number I run, which is the same number I find capable of supporting Displacer. Those aren't as expensive as duals, and if you can afford Restoration Angel or Cloudstone Curio, then you could easily afford those too. They're significantly better than Treva's Ruins, a card I directly called out earlier, and you could probably drop a couple of Temples and your mana base would enable earlier plays.
Things coming in tapped is bad, is what I'm saying, and significantly closer to 'suboptimal' than a mana base that can support multiple colorless sources. The filters are excellent, get you some, then get yourself a Displacer. Now you're playing with power /NES.
February 22, 2016 4:24 p.m.
Yes I understand that. I was supporting the fact that a 3 color Optimal mana base can support 10 sources of Colorless mana.
I mentioned the ABUR Duals make for an optimal mana base but they are expensive. The Tap lands make a mana base suboptimal, especially when bouncing other lands to your hand.
My point in short, an Optimal mana base can run a good number of Colorless producing lands. Like Filters.
February 22, 2016 6:23 p.m.
PookandPie says... #16
That was not directed toward you, that was clearly directed toward RoarMaster. Next time, I'll tag to make that more clear, but the deck on his profile has Resto and Cloudstone Curio, and he was the one who said, "yes it is easy to run that many colorless sources in an EDH deck, but it is far from optimal in a 3 color deck"- I thought this made it clear enough that my post was directed at Roarmaster, despite being after yours.
Most of what I said was directly supporting you, Azire. My mention of the ABUR duals was in reference to what he said, "I mean sure, If I wanted to spend 4x as much money, over an extra $1000, I could have a mana base that could support Displacer easily, just like you. But I have a mortgage and a life to spend my money on, and cant afford it unfortunately." Which is weak justification after making a sweeping statement about optimal mana bases and colorless producing lands, in my opinion. I do see how you may have taken that as directed toward you, but my second paragraph and beyond should have elucidated that I was attempting to speak to the other party.
February 22, 2016 6:55 p.m.
RoarMaster says... #17
Yes an optimal land base can run that many colorless sources, no problem, but that is because you have a bunch of reliable lands to support them. It is easier for a deck to run a bunch of colorless if you are running a bunch of fetches/shocks/ABURs because those cards make up for the loss of reliability caused by the colorless sources. If the deck doesnt run $300+ worth of lands, then it can be difficult.
I own over a dozen EDH decks, and I simply cannot afford to put that much money into the land base of each deck, especially if the only real reason is to run displacer. I have hyper competitive decks that have 'perfect' land bases, but Roon is far from a competitive commander, and thus I dont feel the need to spend that much on the deck. I have enough decks and have played the game long enough that I would rather my deck play into the theme I have set rather than just filling it up with goodstuffs. Hence why I run so many ETB lands and ways to bounce those lands back to hand for re-using their effects. As I said, Im all about the cool value plays, EDH is all about value plays and big splashy stuff in my eyes, as its not a very competitive format. Re-using ETB triggers is what Roon is all about, and doing so with land triggers is not just sweet, its on theme, thats why I run the Scrylands/bounce/ect. I am well aware that lands entering tapped is a drawback, and running 4 bounce lands can slow that down even farther, but as of yet it hasnt been an issue really. As I said, if I want to play a competitive deck I wouldnt be running Roon.
As for reliquary tower... Just because something is a format staple doesnt mean it should be run in every deck. Since I am going to be unable to cast 7 cards a turn anyway, and I might as well just keep the 'best' cards I drew, the rest are probably never going to get cast, so holding onto them doesnt help me at all really. Thats why it isnt a bad thing to draw 12 cards and then discard 5, since you are keeping the best 7, and wont be able to cast all of them in a turn anyway. Once in a blue moon it might come in handy, but it will be just that, handy, not a necessity like having my colors early game is.
TL;DRAdding $300 or so in lands to run a $4 card in a non-competitive deck simply isnt worth it. I personally cannot afford to pimp out each of my decks like that, and save such expenditures for competitive environments. Between the 55 finalized decks I own, only a half dozen get that kind of attention. No trust funds for this guy.
February 22, 2016 7:07 p.m.
I only own a set of ABUR, Fetches, etc. I simply move them between decks.
Or of course I just print Proxies of them and include them in decks. Most people don't have a problem with Proxy as long as you can prove you own the actual cards. Just say, "This is Proxy, I have the real card in this deck here."
Most of my Proxy are REALLY cheap. Just printed on regular printer paper and sleeved up in front of a Basic Land. That saves you from constant swapping but I swap between decks for Tournaments. No Proxies allowed in Tournaments.
My point was that even without ABUR and similar cards, running those sources that can produce Colorless actually ADDS reliability.
Our Metas must be completely different. Being limited to 7 cards isn't good. With mass draw effects, Parlay and other stuff, I would never run a deck without Reliquary Tower. To me it would be like not including Command Tower in a 3 color deck like Roon.
I can't imagine owning 12+ sets of ABUR Duals, Fetches, etc. People that rich play Vintage.
February 22, 2016 7:24 p.m. Edited.
PookandPie says... #19
I own 9 Commander decks with my most competitive one, a Zur deck, in the making. I have over about forty 60 card decks, with two of those being competitive Legacy decks, two being tier 2 Legacy decks. I've got roughly the same number of decks, but I don't share your problem.
This, "$300 in lands" thing that you purport is also extremely untrue, and I'll repeat why for the second time, now (this being the third time I've said it): You run Flooded Grove, Mystic Gate, Wooded Bastion, and not only do you give yourself 3 more colorless sources, but they also fix your colored mana base extremely well (better than those Theros block Temples you run, way better than Treva's Ruins). Those are roughly $50 in lands, and would improve your mana base significantly plus have the added bonus of allowing you to run the Displacer.
There are three things you've said that I disagree with, and I'm not going to suffer your random digressions about spending money on cards further, because it is irrelevant. You can address these, or none at all, as far as I'm concerned:
You said: "yes it is easy to run that many colorless sources in an EDH deck, but it is far from optimal in a 3 color deck."
This is objectively false- and I will not back off of this no matter how often you try to bring ABUR duals that aren't even relevant into this. Optimal has no bearing on budget or individual cost of cards. Therefore, your mentioning of card price after I've already called you out on what is optimal and what is not is largely irrelevant.
Secondly, you said, "I just dont think 7 sources is reliable enough."
Then you run the three lands I mentioned, on top of everything else you have, and you should be able to use Displacer fine, therefore making this not a reason to avoid utilizing the card if you actually wish to run it. 10 colorless sources is more than enough in my own play experience. If you just don't like the card, just say you don't like the card. Don't continually come up with irrelevant excuses as to why it is bad while using hyperbole.
Thirdly, and this is a new one, "Adding $300 or so in lands to run a $4 card in a non-competitive deck simply isnt worth it."
It's $50~ in cards, at least that I recommended to you, and you know it. They're cards you should probably already be running anyway, if you're going to talk about what is optimal and what is not (and don't get me started on fetches while discussing optimal, which I didn't even bring up). Don't blow the number out of proportion like I don't know what the value of these cards is. The dual lands are irrelevant, and the filters are straight upgrades for your slow mana base. Ignorant statements like, "No trust funds for this guy" don't further your argument when I'm directly attacking your use of optimal when it was disingenuous and incorrect.
Nobody is saying that you have to have a set of ABUR duals for each deck- that's some spectacular red herring I'm not even going to touch, considering I said you don't even need those.
After this, I'm pretty sure I'm done here, because the Dunning-Kruger Effect is in full swing. I'm pretty sure this isn't going to go anywhere because you're so completely fixated on ABUR duals and fetches that you don't find it funny that optimal and Treva's Ruins don't even enter the same sentence in a mana base discussion.
February 22, 2016 7:41 p.m.
RoarMaster says... #20
PookandPie lmao, you got issues bud. Considering I mentioned, in passing, ONCE, ABUR duals, Im not sure where you get me being fixated on them. But you know what man? You obviously dont know how to have a conversation without degrading into insults, so I wont bother trying to communicate with you. Im not here to argue or call people names, and refuse to sit here and listen to your verbal abuse while I am being nothing but civil. Good day to you sir.
February 22, 2016 8:01 p.m.
PookandPie says... #21
Really? Because you're bringing up a $300 number out of nowhere when only 3 cards were recommended to you (that don't total $300), so you're obviously bringing up fetches and/or duals when that's neither here nor there, but if that's the kind of mental gymnastics you need to perform in order to go out on top then more power to you.
Also, feel free to point out any name I called you. Telling you that something you said is incorrect or false isn't an insult, FYI.
Good day to you, as well, sir. Fun argument, I like how you went from optimization to budget, and then to victimization. Good talk.
February 22, 2016 8:24 p.m.
RoarMaster says... #22
If thats what you call a "Good talk", I pity your communication/people skills. And if you dont realize that you are still being insulting, well, then I dont know what to say. And if you do know you are still being insulting, yet are continuing anyway, well, you are not a good person, and I dont mind cutting this conversation short. I have no time or patience for such behaviour, and neither should anyone else.
February 22, 2016 8:42 p.m.
Short version of the argument, 10+/- Colorless sources in a three color deck is easy, can be done on a budget, is closer to optimal, are far better lands than Tapped Lands or Tapped Land + Return to hand.
So all in all, argument that running more Colorless is suboptimal - wrong, budget issues - cards aren't expensive, less reliable mana base - they make it MORE reliable.
So back to the original point of the thread, there has not been a good reason presented to not run Eldrazi Displacer.
It gives the added bonuses of half the CMC of Deadeye Navigator, only 3 for the ability, can target (almost) anything. Another way to look at it is, a second Deadeye.
February 22, 2016 8:43 p.m. Edited.
RoarMaster says... #24
iAzire In case you miss interpreted my original post, I said that I didnt want to dilute My landbase in order to play Displacer. My lanbase is dedicated to other things, such as ETB effects and engines, as I have said a couple of times. I never said Displacer was bad, or that it shouldnt be used due to the colorless constraints, just that I didnt have enough colorless sources to make it reliable enough.
The OP had nothing to do with optimal lands, tap lands, or bounce lands, Pook went off on that tangent for whatever reason, but it is/was off topic.
February 22, 2016 11:28 p.m.
PookandPie says... #25
It's hardly off topic, because I clearly mentioned the Shadowmoor/Eventide filters as colorless sources, which are hardly things that would dilute your mana base.
You're also the one who brought up things being optimal, and then switched subject to budget when I disagreed.
If anyone's communication skills are lacking, it's solely upon the head of the person who brought up a poor argument and immediately abandoned it for a price digression. You still wouldn't be diluting your mana base by adding the filters, and they're certainly not $300, so I'm not seeing exactly where your issue is, here, but you apparently want to keep this going by bringing up things that still don't make any sense or are not good arguments to use when someone disagrees. So that's a thing. Good job.
February 23, 2016 1:08 a.m.
RoarMaster says... #26
PookandPie the reason I stopped making comments about my card choices with you a couple posts ago, is because you cannot help but come off insulting, and I find it very difficult to have a civil logical conversation with someone who is constantly and intentionally trying to make me angry. That is simply not conducive to any sort of discussion. Apparently you cannot see this unfortunately. I mean, if you are intentionally trolling, ummm, good job I guess? But if not then I just really dont get where all this angst is coming from.
February 23, 2016 1:18 a.m.
PookandPie says... #27
Trust me, I'm not being insulting. I'm attempting to address all points with which I disagree in a concise manner (which I have been a fair more verbose than I actually need to be). If anything, I'm typing in a nice way because there is a lot more I could say; you're reading this as condescension probably because I'm disagreeing with you.
Here's my timeline of our little discussion here: You say you don't want to run it because mana base. I say a few ideas, including the filters, as well as my personal view of the card. You say an optimal mana base in 3 color can't support it. I say your mana base could support it with filters, and a more optimal mana base could similarly do so over a suboptimal one running Treva's Ruins. You make another post, ending it with, "If I had an extra $1,000, I could support Displacer." I say nay nay, and reply with the filters again. You reply, talking about $300 and trust funds. I, once again, mention the filters and how they have no bearing on these numerical values that you popped in there twice in a row (which is why I brought up a fixation on duals and fetches, by the way, since this was the 2nd or 3rd time you ignored the filters and was more than the, "ONCE" you said you mentioned them), and then decided to address the points in order because your posts were getting longer but still were still fixated on prices far higher than the filters. Then you started telling me that I've insulted you when I didn't even say anything about you as a person.
That's by and large how this conversation went. I get that no one likes to be disagreed with and all of that, but it's a thing that happens sometimes. Again, good talk.
February 23, 2016 3:18 a.m.
RoarMaster says... #28
PookandPie When I said an optimal mana base wouldnt support it I was referring to the fact that you generally dont want just under 1/3 of your lands to produce only colorless. There are a variety of cards that do produce both colorless and colored, but few aside from the filter lands are cards that I would consider optimal.
You asked me to look at your Roon deck, which I did, and after looking at your landbase and cost of the deck, which was $1000 more than mine, I made the comment about having the extra thousand to support displacer. I was not saying the lands required to play displacer cost $1000, but that with $1000 you should be having no problems with running displacer with the card options available to build a mana base with.
You once again mention the filter lands, which are apparently going for 12/17/21$ and not exactly what I would call cheap. I think fairly seriously over spending anything over $10 on a card honestly. The fact that sometimes they whiff without 1 of the two needed colors to activate, means that although they do mana fix more, they do not mana fix as reliably as say a temple.
You apparently missed the fact that my "ONCE" was, as I said, about ABUR Duals, not filters.
My $300 land estimation was for the 'fast' land build with filters, fetches and shocks.
I personally enjoy getting disagreed with, I feel that it is one of the best ways to learn things. Through constructive debate. Constructive. And what you ended up doing was not constructive at all. Intentionally attempting to provoke a negative emotional response isnt conducive to a constructive disagreement at all. You are a smart guy, so Im sure you are well aware of how you were being insulting. One does not need to directly say anything about a person to be insulting to them, there are all sorts of underhanded and subtle ways of doing so, such as mocking "There is that. Good Job". So please, if you are going to be insulting, at least stand by your guns, dont be all 'Nuh-uh! Wasnt me!' about it afterwards. See what I did there? Paraphrased something you said into something insulting. Another way of being insulting without directly insulting some one.
Im glad you were able to curb yourself for that last post, as it did not come off insulting at all in it, and it would indeed be something I would call a good talk.
February 23, 2016 4:41 a.m.
Pinkiepiek9 says... #29
This iswhy Colorless cards is the best type. Blue are such a bad color that it can only be good if pared with this card. #keepprophetbanned
February 23, 2016 12:38 p.m.
Threedirtygoblins says... #30
What the hell is This post? Your all stupid. First off reliquary tower is a given in all decks. No exceptions. Second if your going to fight about personal things then go on tumbler.
February 23, 2016 1:46 p.m.
ThebetterRoarMaster says... #31
No. Nothing makes for more fun then a group fight. Besides PookandPie is right.he is not begin in insulting. Your just being defensive because you're deck is bad and you know it. If you don't like it then fix it. Don't disregard his advise because your mad at him. It's just a game.
February 23, 2016 1:51 p.m.
Pinkiepiek9 I'm not sure if I know how to read your post.
Yes Colorless is a great type as it can be included in everything. Except this is talking about Eldrazi Displacer which is considered White.
Blue is possibly the best color for EDH, easily top 2. It is the best imo, a lot of people say Green because Green can ramp but a good Green deck will easily fall to a good Blue deck.
Your points, regardless of being serious or sarcastic are opposing. You can't imply that one is good and the other is bad when both are in fact good.
As for the "#keepprophetbanned" Most players (including the RC who banned Prophet) would agree that the problem with Prophet was with Casual players. Prophet was not ban worthy if you looked at Competitive gameplay.
Now what is the difference between Casual and Competitive? The decks themselves. Casual decks are usually not built very well so they have problems with cards that aren't problems in the format itself. So if you have problems with Prophet, that only says that your deck isn't very good. I said in the ban thread and I'll say it again, we should not ban cards because people can't build decks. Having problems with cards and other decks is what causes players to try to build better decks and makes those players better. We can't ban everything that Casual players have a problem with, otherwise we will have a Kindergarten format that any 100 cards can compete in.
You may be asking yourself why this is relevant. It is relevant because those same Casual players are typically the players requesting a ban on Deadeye Navigator and possibly Eldrazi Displacer here soon due to the similar effect in a different color.
February 23, 2016 2:08 p.m.
PookxRoarShipper says... #34
I think what he means is that cards like Prophet, deadeye, and displacer can ruin the game for people who play token decks and speed. Displacer isn't as big a deal to him or her because it's not as big of a mana producer like prophet is. That's what I think anyway.
February 23, 2016 2:56 p.m.
rEiemKrabTSuGua1999 says... #35
I think you should stop this fighting and apologize to Midna-Kun for ruining their post. They asked a question expecting an answer and you've been arguing for so long that no one has even answered the question. Midna-Kun, my group does think that Displacer is a very powerful card and we prefer Prophet any day of the week. Hopefully they will unbann Prophet soon so we can continue playing Magic the way it was meant to be played.
February 23, 2016 3:09 p.m.
RoarMaster says... #36
I feel a little flattered to have inspired some one to spend enough time to bother making multiple fake accounts in my name, lol. I guess some people really just dont have anything better to spend their time on.
iAzire In case you hadnt noticed yet, this conversation has been invaded by trolls, and I can only assume that the 'colorless roolz, blue sux' comment is one of theirs.
February 23, 2016 3:29 p.m.
Seedborn Muse is still legal and arguably better. Untapping everything, including Artifacts which is great with Artifact ramp. Add to that the fact that she is Mono-Green, she can go in more decks.
Every deck that was running Prophet of Kruphix was/should have been running Seedborn Muse, Alchemist's Refuge and occasionally Vedalken Orrery.
The benefits of running those other cards is the fact that you can give anything Flash, and not just your creatures.
As we all know, or should know, redundancy is good in EDH to increase the likelihood of getting those effects. The decks that were running Prophet lost one card, they didn't lose the ability the do the same stuff.
February 23, 2016 3:34 p.m.
PookandPie says... #38
Great, I have trolls agreeing with me. There goes any credibility I thought I had.
February 23, 2016 6:22 p.m.
PookandPie says... #39
Though I love there's a guy named PookxRoarShipper.
Roar, we can be like Tweek and Craig.
February 23, 2016 6:23 p.m.
RoarMaster says... #40
I think this may be one of the more entertaining shit-shows I have been a part of on this site. :) thanks errybody!
February 23, 2016 6:57 p.m.
Pinkiepiek9 says... #41
Valrolz is th best card in the world!!,!,!! Scavange is best ability. Pinkie is best pony.
February 23, 2016 7:16 p.m.
RoarMaster2.0 says... #42
Clearly Twinklebottom is the best pony. Also I'm glad to see the trolls have taken over the post. VICTORY SCREECH!!!!! LEEDLE LEEDLE LEEDLE LEE!!!!!!
February 23, 2016 7:24 p.m.
Burritolover42 says... #43
Is this post still about magic? You know you can report this Midna-Kun?
February 23, 2016 7:59 p.m.
Burritolover42 report for what? The post is lucky to still be getting posts. The question has been answered, the OP hasn't returned. There isn't much left to talk about the subject itself. Let people be social and have their fun.
To make a profile simply to say, "You can report this" is sad. Seriously.
UpperDeckerTaco says... #2
How does it kill unattached equipment? Displacer only displaces creatures...
February 21, 2016 11:16 p.m.