Are these possible cards?

Custom Cards forum

Posted on April 10, 2015, 8:24 p.m. by Kryzis

Well hello :)

April 10, 2015 8:26 p.m.

Kryzis says... #3

FAMOUSWATERMELON I really want to see someone break Your Mind is Like Glass or Ambiguity of Life, those cards seems so much fun.

April 10, 2015 8:33 p.m.

RoarMaster says... #4

What's the question? Are these cards that could be printed? No. Wotc likes to keep things simple, easy to understand, and tot too time consuming. These cards are none of the above.

April 10, 2015 8:34 p.m.

Kryzis says... #5

RoarMaster then do you think that there could be a deck somewhere that someone could build that utilizes these cards?

April 10, 2015 8:35 p.m.

RoarMaster says... #6

I'd say they are too chaotic of effects to be played in any decent deck. You have little or no control over what happens with half of these cards, something that is known to be bad in mtg. Additionally, break psyche puts cards you don't own into your hand, something that simply is not done in mtg.

April 10, 2015 8:43 p.m.

mathimus55 says... #7

Yea, those are so wordy I couldn't tell what they were supposed to do until o read them a few times. There's for to be some way to make all of them less wordy. Even then I don't see wizards doing anything that complicated

April 10, 2015 8:55 p.m.

xlaleclx says... #8

No one wants to play with obnoxious walls of text

April 11, 2015 1:24 a.m.

Hjaltrohir says... #9

Ambiguity of life doesn't really make sense, Your mind is like glass is way to underpowered for 10 mana rainbow, and all of them are a pain to read. There are some good ideas here but with all the awkward and high mana costs I am not sure there would ever be a deck that could run them :/

April 11, 2015 1:57 a.m.

The_Raven says... #10

I didn't understand a single of those cards.

You need to make then not so overly complicated.

April 11, 2015 2:49 a.m.

JRaynor says... #11

No. I only read the first one and I lost track of what was happening entirely. WAY too complicated.

April 11, 2015 4:02 a.m.

This discussion has been closed