ravnica themed card

Custom Cards forum

Posted on Nov. 28, 2015, 11:44 a.m. by DERPLINGSUPREME

not sure what the name should be- 3ww

sorcery

choose one:

destroy all creatures with watermarks

destroy all creatures without watermarks

.

this just seems to fit the whole "guildless" thing in ravnica while also being a really cool card for EDH purposes.

CuteSnail says... #2

That wouldn't work tho. Because Patagia Viper has two printings. One with the Simic watermark and one without.

November 28, 2015 11:51 a.m.

You could add "in the Ravnica or Return to Ravnica" blocks?

November 28, 2015 11:54 a.m.

@NecroPony I had thought about that and still think that its stupid they refused to print the watermarks on them

@FAMOUSWATERMELON I guess....

idk

im very tired and actually thought of this in a dream so

idk

November 28, 2015 12:09 p.m.

JWiley129 says... #5

This looks like an Un-card

November 28, 2015 12:12 p.m.

dbpunk says... #6

This is an un card. Like I'm pretty sure the markings on the card (like flavor text and rule texts) are only affected by uncards

November 28, 2015 12:16 p.m.

CuteSnail says... #7

You could expand it to either multicolored creatures or Monocolored creatures.

November 28, 2015 12:18 p.m.

@NecroPony yeah, thats definately better and I thought of it and the only reason I dont like it is b/c it wouldn't hit any of the watermarked things that are 1 color and would hit things like marath when it shouldnt but yeah that seems like the best way for it to be put together

November 28, 2015 12:21 p.m.

MindAblaze says... #9

This would also hit the Mirrans and the Phyrexians

November 28, 2015 1:29 p.m.

buildingadeck says... #10

And the Khans/Dragons

November 28, 2015 1:53 p.m.

I know.

thats fine.

November 28, 2015 2:03 p.m.

November 28, 2015 3:24 p.m.

scopesightzx says... #13

would this hit promotional cards as well?

November 28, 2015 3:45 p.m.

@scopesightzx does the promotional card have a watermark?

if so, yes.

this'd be a good uncard, though.

November 28, 2015 3:50 p.m.

This discussion has been closed