Boros Aggro vs Predator Ooze
Deck Help forum
Posted on Feb. 17, 2013, 2 p.m. by seevers35
I play a Boros Aggro deck casually with friends at work. A buddy of mine plays a Mono-Green Aggro deck with four Predator Ooze . If he drops a turn two or three Ooze I struggle to win the game.
I want to know what I should do against Predator Ooze . I have thought about sideboarding Oblivion Ring , but I was hoping that red had an answer other than cards like Traitorous Blood .
Predator Ooze seems better than the amount of play it gets. Triple green is tough, but with Rancor around green is good.
February 17, 2013 3:14 p.m.
well i think the main reason it issnt run as much is starting as a 1/1 i recall many decks running card:Curse of Death's Hold furthermore triple green can indeed be harsh unless monogreen.
also Predator Ooze was extremly vunarable to Vapor Snag or the current Unsummon even though i dont know any running them
February 17, 2013 3:31 p.m.
Trmiller1326 says... #5
There's a lot of synergy out there with the ooze as well.
Nightshade Peddler for death touch.Rancor , Alpha Authority , Corpsejack Menace , not to mention many of the Evolve Mechanic creatures and instants from Gatecrash.
February 17, 2013 3:33 p.m.
anyway unless it needs to be standard Dispense Justice is an option.
February 17, 2013 3:33 p.m.
Fiend Hunter will net you a creature and exile Predator Ooze . Or you can use Boros Reckoner and let your opponent punish theirself.
February 17, 2013 3:40 p.m.
because of the lack of indestructibility I have never liked Boros Reckoner the few times I played it people would kill it so damn fast... something more like Stuffy Doll despite the cost can be far better at stopping a determined creatures without trample/flying
but as far as red goes nothing come to mind to deal with a predator ooze, white exile cards are probably your best/only reliable option.
Trmiller1326 says... #2
Yeah, that's about all you can do against Predator Ooze . I always feel this card doesn't get the respect it deserves.
February 17, 2013 2:58 p.m.