Disperse+Archaeomancer?
Deck Help forum
Posted on Nov. 26, 2013, 5:33 p.m. by silentsnip3r155
Is Disperse and Archaeomancer a good combo, when I cast Archaeomancer get a spell back then cast Disperse and get my Archaeomancer back? Is it worth putting these 4x in a control deck?
Is this for standard? If not, I would run Ghostly Flicker instead, as it does basically the same thing for 3 mana instead, and you can even untap a land to make the mana cost pseudo 2.
If it's standard, then nevermind me. If it's not, check out a pauper deck I had with this interaction
Pauper Challenge: Delverpocalypse
which also used Mist Raven s and/or Ravenous Rats for added utility.
November 26, 2013 6:11 p.m.
Didgeridooda says... #4
To me that seems like a bit of a waste to use as a combo. It works just as you intend it to, but does not seem super effective to me.
Sounds like you should use Roon of the Hidden Realm or Venser, the Sojourner . If you like ETB effects you might like them. Unless this is for standard.
November 26, 2013 7:39 p.m.
Honestly I'd rather use Voyage's End so you at least get some scry out of the combo
November 26, 2013 7:43 p.m.
If it isn't Standard you can also combo Devastation Tide and Archaeomancer to just delay everything. Might be more efficent.
Bobgalarneau says... #2
It going to cost you 6 mana, fordierse and archaomancer, to get an instant or sorcery back in your hand... Seems prety expansive to me..... I hope the spell you are geting back is great.....
November 26, 2013 5:39 p.m.