Need help with originality

Deck Help forum

Posted on Oct. 23, 2011, 7:08 p.m. by Elizabeth_the_Dragon

Alright here's the deal, I make decks, cheap effective real nice. But I love dragons, in alara there has been tons of combos with dragons and all that but its over for standard now. I'm scraping by with little to no support for dragons. Usually I compliment the dragons with early elemental beatdown. But even they got forgotten with standard. The only thing mono red is good for would be RDW but I REALLY hate that.....like a lot. BUT, now I saw the deck snap-dragon. I took a few (or a shame filled lot) of ideas from that deck and budgeted it into my price standards (in other words make a deck and pretend the 30 dollar card Snapcaster Mage doesn't exist). Its a nice deck I really enjoy it and I thank Killhouse for posting on tapped out. But I feel like I didn't do much. This set is killing me, how does someone go from using Ball Lightning to Delver of Secrets  Flip  FlipMTG Card: Insectile Aberration for early game damage? I cannot use mono red if I want to win anymore (unless RDW suddenly becomes enjoyable for me).

My plan is to just work with my deck There be dragons and hope that some crazy elemental or dragon can make me go back to mono red. I'll still work on decks till I get something worth while. But in the meantime I could use some advice on my deck There be dragons and maybe Fiend Flames of Flaming Fiends. There are good decks and all that but now no one bothers to think differently. Either its a sword deck, a birthing pod deck, or some sort of control deck. If people realize, okay the deck is good maybe instead of cycling my own version that has a few tweaks I can either make a cool original deck OR tweak the good deck enough so that it uses a less similar style. Eh I'm just talking but I could use some help on a lot of current decks of mine. Serious look me up tell me what you think. I got tons of decks and some ideas are pretty good (in my opinion anyway)(no one takes the time to read them though). And I mean current decks, some decks here and there I am not proud of.

My bad on the link There be dragons it is not linking the name correctly. Just look up on my account and you will see it though. Exclamation point does not do anything to its name.

October 23, 2011 7:11 p.m.

SwiftDeath says... #3

There be DRAGONS! this is the correct link.

your url has it as there-be-dragons-2 because you have the second deck with the same name you have to add the two or it will go to the origonal.

October 23, 2011 7:33 p.m.

This discussion has been closed